User talk:Tmdecelles

Welcome!

Hello, Tmdecelles! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started

Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset
How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

Policies and Guidelines

Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research
Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community

Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • Resolving disputes
Build consensus • Village pump
Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists
The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)

Things to do

Task Center • Be bold in editing
Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles
Join a WikiProject • Translating articles
Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism

Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft article

Greetings, Tmdecelles, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you created a draft of a Dave's Picks Volume 52 article, and submitted it for review. My advice would be to try to add more references (i.e. footnotes) to the article, to show that the album meets the Wikipedia notability guideline: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." You can start by copying the reference that's in the Grateful Dead discography article. I also suggest adding the track listing -- you can get that from Discogs -- but that's a secondary point. The references are the key. (If you reply here, I will see what you say.) — Mudwater^(Talk) 02:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave's Picks Volume 52 (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM, requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dave's Picks Volume 52 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmdecelles! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Tmdecelles. It looks like you haven't made any edits on Wikipedia since submitting the draft of Dave's Picks Volume 52. I've gone ahead and expanded the draft. Most significantly, I've added several reliable, secondary references, to establish that the album is notable in the Wikipedia sense and therefore is suitable for a stand-alone article.

@Dan arndt: Hello! In light of the additional references, would you care to re-assess the draft for publication? I can click the Resubmit button if that helps. — Mudwater^(Talk) 23:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt: After pondering this further, I'm going to go ahead and move the draft to the main namespace myself. We should be good to go, now that appropriate references have been added. Thanks.

@Tmdecelles: Let me know if you have any questions or comments. (If you reply here, I will see what you say.) — Mudwater^(Talk) 12:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]