User talk:Tinawhittaker

February 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dan Fegan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dan Fegan was changed by Tinawhittaker (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882352 on 2018-02-26T06:54:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ajf773. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dan Fegan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!

Do not remove

Do not remove my additions instead fix the references as I am not sure how to add Forbes and Twitter as a reference but you do and you can confirm the information is 100% accurate to ease my comments again would be in poor taste and very bad karma! These comments are for his son. Tinawhittaker (talk) 07:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CITEHOW and WP:NOT for some guidance on content. Ajf773 (talk) 08:09, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tinawhittaker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Tinawhittaker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional because... (your reason here) --Tinawhittaker (talk) 09:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC) It is not promotional[reply]