Jump to content

User talk:Timmy96/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


2011

February 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Timmy96! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jojhutton (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

2012

January 2012

Hi. When you recently edited Lewis Grabban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Craig Thomson

I noticed you edited the articles Kaunas section. Do you happen. To know of any good sources for Lithuanian footballer appearance stats. Edinburgh Wanderer 17:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Hi. When you recently edited Lars Jacobsen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Karl Hawley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Irvine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Federico Bessone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alan Tate
Roman Pavlyuchenko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kevin Bond

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Herita Ilunga

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Herita Ilunga, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.

There is nothing in the citation you have added to show it was Ilunga's intention for Jones to be sent-off. He was sent-off, which is a refereeing decision. We cannot know Ilunga's intention from the reference given.--Egghead06 (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timmy96

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Timmy96 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – hysteria18 (talk) 20:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

Are you wanting this page deleted, Prod is not for user talk pages. If so reply here to this messageEdinburgh Wanderer 21:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes of course, no matter what happen.

I've removed your Proposed deletion request, which is only for articles; the correct venue for User talk pages is Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. If you need help, use the {{helpme}} or {{helpadmin}} template here on your talk page. Dru of Id (talk) 01:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Please don't PROD your talk page again as that's not what PRODs are intend for & your talk page won't be deleted please see Wikipedia:MFD as advised above if you continue to PROD your page it will be seen as an inappropriate use of PROD templates. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Timmy96 if you want this user talk page gone just blank its content. That is well within your rights as a user. The page will not be deleted by an administrator as you do not get to "opt out" of having a user talk page. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Copying sentences from other websites

Please understand that we MAY NOT copy sentences from most other websites, unless we format them as direct quotes, with quotation marks round them. The words you added to Raphael Varane: "Varane has made it clear that he never had any doubts when he opted to leave Lens for Real Madrid" and "insisted that he always believed in himself and revealed how Mourinho played a part in his move", are copied word for word. Please read WP:COPYVIO. If you continue doing this, you risk being blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Raphaël Varane has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

2014

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Heffernan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • relegated to the Scottish Championship.<ref>{{cite news|title=Hibernian 0 - 2 Hamilton Academical (2 - 2 on aggregate, 3 - 4 on penalty shoot-out|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27464444|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:48, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Keatings may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • such as [[Jaison McGrath]], [[Darian MacKinnon]], [[Jason Scotland]] and [[Mickaël Antoine-Curier]]]. Nevertheless, Keatings was a joint top-scorer with [[Anthony Andreu]], only scoring thirteen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 17 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 27 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Reference Errors on 24 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Your additions to Serdar Tasci are written in bad English, most probably a Google translation of the German article. Someone who translates "Kringe und Frei treffen beim VfB" to "Kringe free and meet at VfB" is not sufficiently proficient in English.

Nochmal in Deutsch, falls Du mit dem Englisch Probleme hast: Bitte unterlasse diese schlechten Übersetzungen des deutschen Wikipedia Artikels, das ist keine Verbesserung des Artikels. Jemand, der "Kringe und Frei treffen beim VfB" in "Kringe free and meet at VfB" übersetzt, hat entweder zuwenig Ahnung von Englisch, um hier vernünftig beitragen zu können oder er hat keine Lust in die Übersetzung Arbeit reinzustecken. Auch dann sollte man es bleiben lassen.--Jaellee (talk) 05:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't know if there is a language you understand better than English or German, so I'll try it again in those two: Stop adding that bad translation. According to Wikipedia:Translation, an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing. If you insist, you will eventually be blocked.
Hör auf damit, diesen uneditierten Haufen schlecht übersetzes Englisch in den Artikel zu kopieren. Das ist schlimmer, als wenn die Information nicht in dem Artikel steht. Wenn Du so weiter machst, handelst Du Dir damit nur eine Sperre ein. --Jaellee (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Serdar Tasci may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 10 season, On 29 August 2009, he extended his contract at Stuttgart until the summer of 2014.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://vfb.de/en/aktuell/news/2009/32853.php | title = Serdar Tascı extends until

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Stevie May, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. And add sufficient edit summary as to why that edit was reverted. Param Mudgal (talk) 19:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 7 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:43, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 15 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC

2015

March 2015

Reference Errors on 8 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robbie Muirhead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Record. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Archived references

Hello. When we're including an archive url in a reference, we start off by formatting the reference in the normal way, with |url= set to the original link. Then we include the archive bits: |archiveurl= set to the url of the archived page, and if the original link is still live, |deadurl= set to no. You're doing them the wrong way round. E.g. this one, from Ryan Edwards (English footballer)

<ref>{{cite web|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20150330152856/http://www.rochdaleafc.co.uk/news/article/transfer-news-edwards-570082.aspx|title=Edwards Decision Yet To Be Made|publisher=Rochdale A.F.C.|accessdate=30 March 2015|date=31 December 2012|archiveurl=http://www.rochdaleafc.co.uk/news/article/transfer-news-edwards-570082.aspx|archivedate=30 March 2015<!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>

should read

<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rochdaleafc.co.uk/news/article/transfer-news-edwards-570082.aspx|title=Edwards Decision Yet To Be Made|publisher=Rochdale A.F.C.|date=31 December 2012|accessdate=30 March 2015|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20150330152856/http://www.rochdaleafc.co.uk/news/article/transfer-news-edwards-570082.aspx|archivedate=30 March 2015|deadurl=no}}</ref>

And if the original link goes dead, all we have to do is change deadurl=no to deadurl=yes. Hope this helps, cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

I assumed good faith with the previous message. Now please stop formatting the references wrongly. Struway2 (talk) 22:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
I've fixed the malformed citations you did at Jack Sampson. Please look at my changes and try to understand them.
  1. |url= is for the original url, from the club website, whether it's live or dead;
  2. |accessdate= is for the date that url was accessed and found to be live; we don't put today's date for the accessdate of a dead link;
  3. |archiveurl= is for the archive url, the link to the archiving website;
  4. |archivedate= is for the date the page was archived; this date will appear somewhere on the archive page – on this one, the date Jul 7 2012 appears in a black box on the top bar, and it also appears as part of the page url: ...web.archive.org/web/20120707224017/http:....
Please see the documentation at Template:Cite web#URL. Thank you for listening. Struway2 (talk) 09:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

You understand English well enough, and a few months ago you were using good English in your edit summaries here and here. So please listen.

The standard of English at Rob Lainton is not good, but it can be copyedited. But please stop doing the citations the wrong way round. The |url= is for the link to the club website. The |archiveurl= is for the link to the archiving website.

If you really don't see the difference, please tell me what you don't understand. Otherwise, please start doing the citations properly. You can't expect other editors to sort out your mistakes just because you don't want to. Thank you for listening. Struway2 (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Stubbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Porteous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Miguel Pallardó

moved to own section by talk-page stalker: Struway2 (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

  • On a subject we already have discussed when I had an account (AlwaysLearning), we also do not write about EVERY game a player had and EVERY injury he had, like you did in this player's page. It was fine and concise as it was, the only real good refs you added were for his first goal with Levante (his first ever as a senior) and his Spanish under-21 spell. Thank you. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 00:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

But this ref (just found out now) from his goal for Levante against Tenerife is "interesting", it's BEFORE the game, who took place on 8 November and not 7 like you say (http://archivo.marca.com/edicion/marca/futbol/2a_division/previa/es/desarrollo/1182249.html)! --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

  • On his teammate Juan Manuel Delgado Lloria, I reverted you partially because: 1 - after my hard work, you reverted the correct dashes in match results ("–") and reinstated the small ones again ("-"); 2 - you overdetailed in storyline, no need for every goal he scored with Kalloni or any other club; 3 - you call player "Juanma" all the time when "he" is enough after the start of sentence; 4 - I offered translation for the references in Greek, you removed them ALL (?!); 5 - this is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, no FBooks or Twitters are allowed; 5 - you did add some good refs (like the 20% percent on any future transfer), that was a solid work on your part.

Please respect other people's work (and please note, if we start an edit war, we will BOTH be blocked), thank you --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

2016

February 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Osman Sow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vitesse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Reference errors on 13 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul-José M'Poku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Arabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Eckersley (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darrell Russell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gastón Ramírez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Echo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

2017

January 2017

Reference errors on 14 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello there, please read this message where you are mentioned (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Struway2#If_you_are_interested...). Doubt: what is your nationality? I am afraid your level of English is still quite poor, last time the user where i wrote the message above talked to you about this (seen here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timmy96&diff=654368962&oldid=654359064) and there still have been no improvements.

Attentively --Quite A Character (talk) 20:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

  • I have cleaned up Lars Unnerstall's article. Please don't add transfer speculation like you did when you mentioned Yann Sommer the storyline, and you don't have to say (in this case) "Unnerstall" TEN TIMES in the same paragraph, "he" is enough after the first time in each paragraph; also, no need to mention number of appearances each season (and the plural is APPEARANCES, not APPEARANCE), that is what the chart below is for --Quite A Character (talk) 08:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello Quite A Character,

I have read your message and I am going to respond to your questions, now I am back from my vacation.

My nationality is British. I am aware about the level of my English is poor but I am not perfect like you and other Wikipedia users. I do admit I acknowledged my errors when I proofread the article after saving the changes because I rushed myself over the internet connection. For example, it may be slow or that anyone in my family might be using the phone, which slows the internet connection. I wanted to expand the article with information to make it more detailed. Furthermore, I use Google Chrome to edit Wikipedia and I hope you respect my choice of using this browser because it's my preference.

From Timmy96 19:21 (in British Time), 30 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Of course I respect your editing preference of Google Chrome, no problem with that as long as you edit as it's customary here (for example, no OVERDETAIL). And I never told I was perfect OK?

Thanks for the reply, attentively --Quite A Character (talk) 08:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Timmy96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

2018

January 2018

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dominik Kaiser, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Timmy96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

At the start of my Wikipedia, I began editing random articles when I just added words (like copying and pasting words from the website and from other language on Wikipedia pages, without using my own words), using this references as my source [1], not including quotation mark on copying and pasting from website, terrible sentence structure (which I still need to work, but it's not easy) and being lazy when editing a Wikipedia article that crossed my mind. As a result, I received criticism from other users for my poor editing. For example, Vanished user 201913 said: "when he does he engages in WP:COPYVIO and says to people who warn him "I want to be blocked"" on Andrea Orlandi's article and said: "Whaat? English please" on Rabiu Ibrahim's article. Another one user Ilikeeatingwaffles said: "Not very encyclopaedic content" on Darron Gibson's article.

From June 2012 to May 2014, I decided to exiled my self from editing Wikipedia and began editing anonymously, where I have been changing my ways. However, the constant of changing IP address and editing anonymously caused me to edit Wikipedia as a user, which I went back. From that point, I have been editing Wikipedia as a user and proved myself that I can edit Wikipedia without copying and pasting from other websites. I began to go far on going on foreign website, which I never heard at first and since use it as a reliable to add on that Wikipedia article I am editing. I also don't edit any Wikipedia article randomly and began to choose what article I intending to edit. Most of the article I intending to edit must be the ones that I believe it should be edited and to ensure it is up to date.

From October 2010 to June 2012, these were the article that I edited and I, again, edited the article as my improvement. I only adding the ones that I edited on my account, not any random anomymously user, as there are everywhere that I couldn't find the:

2019

November 2019

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Huge edit

This is just incredible! So much info added in one edit. I am shocked to see such a huge change in a short time. I must thank you for that and offer my appreciation. Ae245 (talk) 08:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

To Ae245 (talk)

Your welcome that I expanded information on Takumi Minamino's article. He was one of the players that I got a list to edit and the timing of editing him was right when he was linked with a move to Liverpool. I also recommend you to use Japanese and Austrian website to find more sources about him.


From Timmy96 21:23 (in British Time), 27 December 2019 (UTC)

2020

January 2020

Hello, and a happy new year. Thank you for expanding Jérémie Bela, I was working on him myself but kept getting distracted by other things... I can have a look at what you've done at Garry Bocaly when I find the time, but not sure when that's likely to be. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

I am back from my holiday and started to edit Wikipedia after being away from the computer. Now, I have edited Didier Digard. Struway2 (talk), can you edit an article on Didier Digard when you have a time, please? When I looked at articles that you amended, such as Neil Danns, Daniel Crowley, Rhoys Wiggins, Jérémie Bela, Garry Bocaly and Wes Thomas, I admired your work on how you structured the sentence.

From Timmy96 22:18 (in British Time), 27 February 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maya Yoshida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Echo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Thomas Kraft

Hi, while I appreciate your work on the Thomas Kraft article, could you be more careful in future? The titles of the German references are full of errors (e.g. "Towart"). Also please do not use the <br> tag within references, each citation should be enclosed in its own <ref></ref> tags. And please use also straight apostrophes as per MOS:APOSTROPHE. --Jaellee (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

I had a look at your latest contribution to the article of Jérome Polenz and you have ignored everything that I wrote above. You still use the <br> tag within references, curly apostrophes, and the German references are still full of errors. Next time I will just remove all the references with errors and the stuff they source since your are obviously not interested in improving your edits. --Jaellee (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

2021

March 2021

Level of detail

Please note that we are an encyclopaedia, not a sports almanac. The level of detail you add to footballer biographies is simply not appropriate. Key events - first game, first goal etc. - are fine. Every single and goal? No thank you. I have also had to tidy up language and grammar at Mohammed Abu. GiantSnowman 12:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

No. You have been reverted - so follow WP:BRD. Do not blindly revert and restore your mistakes. GiantSnowman 14:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Once again - please do not revert and re-add the material that has been challenged and removed. Take to the article page to discuss. GiantSnowman 17:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
For the final time - please do not add superfluous level of detail to BLPs. You have been told previously not to add significant detail about minor career points, and you have been told not to revert and restore information without seeking talk page consensus. Why can't you understand either? GiantSnowman 17:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

You know, GiantSnowman. In my opinion, I feel that you don't take into a lot of consideration on the references I added to expand the article by any means necessary. I sacrificed my time just to edit Mohammed Abu and Gregory van der Wiel. I feel that you never regularly edited both of these articles until I intervened and change a lot that you couldn't accept. From Timmy96 18:25 (in British Time), 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Firstly, review the page histories to see who created, expanded, and updated the articles throughout their lives (answer: me). Secondly, you continue to fail to grasp that some of the sources and information you add is simply not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. GiantSnowman 19:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Okay, GiantSnowman. I saw the page histories and that's fair enough. I nevertheless feel that my edits on Mohammed Abu and Gregory van der Wiel was meaningless and was all for nothing. That's why I asked Struway2 if he can edit both articles. When he amended the articles I edited (for example Neil Danns, Daniel Crowley, Rhoys Wiggins, Jérémie Bela, Garry Bocaly and Wes Thomas), I was amazed and admired how Struway2 made those changes on the article that it helped me on improve editing Wikipedia. I accepted the changes that he made. From Timmy96 10:43 (in British Time), 24 May 2021 (UTC)

As I have explained t you, and as we discussed at WT:FOOTBALL - this is an encyclopaedia, not a sports almanac. We do not need details of every single game, goal, and event. Your level of detail is not appropriate, and some of your wording also seems to violate WP:NPOV and WP:SYNTH. I am happy to work with you to expand and improve articles, but not if you fail to recognise the concerns that have been raised about your edits. If you are simply going to blindly add in any and every source you find about a player then we have a serious problem. GiantSnowman 09:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Absolutely. There must be thousands of player articles out there that are currently stubs and could be expanded to a reasonable length - this would be a far better use of your editing. Black Kite (talk) 08:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

You don't appear to have taken notice of the warning messages above. Please note that further addition of large swathes of poorly written trivia will result in you being blocked. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

This month of editing Wikipedia has been shocking me because I never seen something like this. My edits on Rory Loy, Willo Flood, Jon Daly and Kelvin Etuhu has been reverted. I felt all the references on the footballers I found for you was not for nothing and feeling my edits feels meaningless. I hope the references I found for you would help users. Instead, it has been reverted back and would never be useful, as I hope for. I do admit I made countless mistakes on my grammar, sentence structures and spellings because I rush myself on edits by setting up my own deadline. That’s something I should not do. Because of what happened yesterday, it has impacted me on whether I should continue edit Wikipedia in the future. Timmy96 00:22, 28 October 2021. (UTC)

If you are unable to complete your edits in a satisfactory fashion within your deadline perhaps it would be better to not insert them into the article until they are ready.Dark-World25 (talk) 07:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
There must be thousands of player articles out there that are currently stubs and could be expanded to a reasonable length - this would be a far better use of your editing time rather than inserting every fact you can find, and then being reverted. Black Kite (talk) 08:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Black Kite (talk), you said you will block me. Why don’t you do that now? I wouldn’t mind. I accept my fate. Timmy96 17:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

  • I haven't blocked you because you haven't reverted those articles back again. As Isaid, there are loads of footballer articles in need of improvement and you're clearly capable of doing it (if you check your language with a grammar checker). Black Kite (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Black Kite (talk), if I would go back to edit Wikipedia again, the first thing I would do is edit five footballers. That’s my honestly. Would those footballers never reverted if I made improvements on the articles? I would try and use grammar checker. Timmy96 21:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Blocked from certain articles

... and what happened? Yes, the same five articles as before, and still full of poor English and grammar errors. I have blocked you from editing them. Black Kite (talk) 14:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Black Kite (talk), I knew you would block me. For the past two months, my edits on Rory Loy, Willo Flood, Jon Daly, Kelvin Etuhu and Michael Nelson has been the the biggest failure as a Wikipedia editor. It's such a shame that my Wikipedia edits have gone to waste, without seeing it through. I tried though by improving my English and grammar, even using Grammarly but this is not enough. Also, for every reference that I added, I can not remove it after I worked hard to find it, something other users hasn’t done. Timmy96 14:45pm, 13 November 2021. (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timmy96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want my access to edit six articles to be reversed all because I was simply expanding it. I didn't take it well when anonymous users reverted my edits back to it was before because, in my opinion, I worked so hard on the references that I found on websites and feel that all my hard was for nothing. Please can you reconsider your decision to allow me to edit the six articles and I will try and improve the six articles once again. Timmy96 11:59 am, 14 November 2021. (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request at my talk page

Hello. I stand by what I've said before: that your expansions of articles are always well researched, usually a net positive, and the grammar issues are pretty minor so long as someone's willing to tidy them up. Between your research and my trimming, I reckon we got the likes of Garry Bocaly, Rhoys Wiggins and Jérémie Bela up to a very decent standard (although I haven't kept Bela very well up to date). But the size and sometimes indiscriminate nature of those expansions doesn't make it easy for editors to want to make the effort.

I'm afraid I haven't got enough spare time to help with that sort of thing at the moment. And if the community has decided that you shouldn't edit these particular pages, I don't think I'd be able to do so on your behalf. An admin would be able to tell you if that's right or not.

Try not to think that your work has been wasted. The references you found are still in the page history, so they're always available for use in the future. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timmy96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I edited Michael Nelson for the first time under Timmy96, I felt it was unfair for not allowing to edit him in the future. It was unfair because users don’t get banned from editing when they edited an article for the first time for only updating information. As for the five articles, I do admit I caused disruptive editing because I don’t take the article revert very well. In my opinion, I spent countless hours researching and finding sources to backup my information as references. I felt that if the article has been reverted, I feel that it was a biggest failure in my opinion and all my hard work of research was for nothing. If anything happens, I will try and move on and don’t try to cause disruptive editing in the future on the six articles.

Decline reason:

I see that while this unblock request has been pending you have done exactly similar unacceptable editing to another article, which gives no confidence whatever that you won't continue in the same way. You also even commented in an edit summary for that new unacceptable editing on the likelihood of its being reverted, in such terms as to suggest that you knew full well that you were continuing precisely the kind of problematic editing for which you were blocked. Furthermore, despite your statement that you "admit [you] caused disruptive editing", the whole tenor of your unblock request is still that you have been wronged, and you show no understanding of what the problems were with your editing. Far from removing the partial block on your account, I have extended it to a sitewide block, as everything indicates that otherwise you will continue in the same way. JBW (talk) 09:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Perhaps I should also mention that your evasion of the block does not encourage one to unblock your account. JBW (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

I see that since I posted the above message you have evaded your block again, made a personal attack, and denied that you see anything wrong with your editing. Those are three pretty good ways of making sure that you won't be unblocked. I suggest you may like to reconsider your approach. JBW (talk) 11:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Well, far from reconsidering your approach, you evaded your block again, in doing so did exactly the kind of unacceptable editing which led to the block, and this time openly announced that you were evading your block, which I can only regard as trolling. The likelihood of your ever being unblocked diminishes every time you openly defy Wikipedia policies. It may not yet be too late for you to reconsider your approach, but if it isn't then it's getting very close. JBW (talk) 09:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timmy96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After four days of being blocked, I started to understand why I have blocked indefinitely and there were factors to the reasons why. I evaded my own block by editing anonymously because I didn't accept that my edits were reverted, so I was willing to edit articles anonymously, knowing about the consequences I would face. I made a personal attack because I was critical of users's actions. But now I understood why they did it. I refused to accept the wrongdoing of my editing because I was delusional and didn't want to face reality that my articles was reverted. For that, I want to apologise for my actions and will not do it again because I should know better on dealing with the situation. I clearly saw my mistakes and vow to make improvements of my editing in the future.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  1. ^ ...
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timmy96/Archive_12&oldid=1176703706"