User talk:Thesaurus001
Dead links
[edit]Please don't mass-remove dead links. It's much better to have a dead link than no source at all, as those links could often be fixed or at least provide an indication of where to find the source (see WP:KDL). Please let me know if you have any more questions. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok i will follow however i am first checking if the article is available somewhere else, only then i am removing them. Thesaurus001 (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Elli How can i become a Wiki administrator? Thesaurus001 (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even if the articles aren't available elsewhere, it doesn't necessarily make sense to remove unless you can find a replacement source. As for becoming an administrator, you apply at requests for adminship, but you generally need to have a long editing track record to be successful. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Like how long? and any shortcut like i was removing dead links and it was being counted as my edits. Any similar editing task to ensure a long editing record? Thesaurus001 (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's generally not a good idea to edit just for the sake of having a high edit count. There's lots and lots of cleanup tasks to do though, such as finding citations for uncited claims. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can you tell me where i can find those specific articles with uncited claims and i could add references to them? Thesaurus001 (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's generally not a good idea to edit just for the sake of having a high edit count. There's lots and lots of cleanup tasks to do though, such as finding citations for uncited claims. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Like how long? and any shortcut like i was removing dead links and it was being counted as my edits. Any similar editing task to ensure a long editing record? Thesaurus001 (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even if the articles aren't available elsewhere, it doesn't necessarily make sense to remove unless you can find a replacement source. As for becoming an administrator, you apply at requests for adminship, but you generally need to have a long editing track record to be successful. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Allen Mendenhall (December 13)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allen Mendenhall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Thesaurus001!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Rpgea per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rpgea. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Spicy (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.