Jump to content

User talk:TheresNoTime/Archive 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 24

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2023-19

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Help talk:Table on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-20

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Do you want a copy of your CUwiki essay?

If so I would be happy to send you a copy. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

That's quite alright, thank you though — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 18:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello TnT

May I just say that I appreciate you immensely. The importance of your work on this project is undeniable. But more than that, I appreciate your dedication to reflection. Not everyone can do that and even fewer can assess the findings and apply changes to themselves and their conduct upon said reflection. You communicated this beautifully through your words. We have all lost the trust of people we care and admire along life's journey due to our emotional state of being in the moment and it sometimes is very hard to regain or rebuild that trust but I commend you on taking the steps and committing to the task of doing just that. I've never blamed you for your emotional response because I understand the reason behind it, even if I disagreed with your actions at the time. You are a unique and magnificent Rainbow of colors and character. You are an amazing symphony of various talents, abilities and experiences. Though some may appear to be negative or set you back, they are still a part of your Song and your journey whose ultimate goal is to be heard and be a part of the larger sound of human kind. I just wanted to stop by and say that you have been heard and I acknowledge you. --ARoseWolf 14:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Agree with ARoseWolf. Brave stuff, your AN posting. Your stock keeps going up, my friend. You are loved. BusterD (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
As someone who has said stupid things early in my wiki-career due to excessive emotional involvement, I empathize with your admittance of fault. You're not the only one who has made this mistake of letting your emotions get the best of you, but there are few who would make an outright apology. I applaud your statement. The Night Watch (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
Hi Sammy, I fully understand how you felt back then, and your motivation was unquestionably honourable. I almost went for the Barnstar of Integrity, which would be appropriate - but this one has a rainbow, which is nice :-) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
👍 ☺ JBW (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Schools are exempt from WP:A7.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Whoops, thanks Bbb23 — restored.. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 19:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
That was fast, thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-21

16:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your comments here. I have a very low tolerance for misplaced condescension, but I should have stepped away earlier. I'm happy that two other editors hopped in to explain and resolve the situation on the talk page. --JBL (talk) 17:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandal on my talk page! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:34, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Please consider extending the block and revoking TPA per recent talk page comment. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-22

MediaWiki message delivery 22:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2023-23

MediaWiki message delivery 22:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-24

MediaWiki message delivery 14:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

ARC

Your statement reminded me of something. My understanding is that if someone isn't active (for whatever reason) when an ArbCom case is started, they have 3 months to respond? AlisonW did try to defend herself and demonstrate accountability, even if it wasn't quite the reponse I was hoping to hear. But it's an attempt at accountability that's more than someone just disappearing from a situation, which is understandable to its own extent too because I'd imagine such events are stressful. So 3 months either way might make sense? I don't have any firm thoughts on this either way and maybe I'm not thinking this through enough, but I do try to keep an open mind. I'll also admit that Secretlondon's statement did bother me because they seem to be extremely concientous about trying to do the right thing. It didn't lead me to the same conclusion as jc37, but it did bother me that something that seemed so clear to me wasn't to others. It wasn't the mistake that bothered me at ARC but the response... I was expected something more along the lines of what GeneralNotability suggested. But I also don't want to make admins from older wikigenerations feel like they're walking on eggshells because some things have changed over time. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello TheresNoTime,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Tech News: 2023-25

MediaWiki message delivery 20:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

AlisonW case request accepted

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Illusion Flame

Hi TNT. I was surprised to see this on my watchlist. Putting aside the wisdom of handling potentially controversial WP:PERM requests off-wiki, why make the right permanent only two weeks into a two month trial that you yourself decided on? I note that you note that the "concern on the talk page" (User_talk:Illusion_Flame#DRAFTIFY_and_hasty_reviewing, I assume), but I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. For me the issue is decidedly un-resolved since Illusion Flame didn't in fact respond to any of my concerns. I was planning to check whether there were still issues with his draftifications when his trial expired – it's hard to tell now since he seems to have mostly given up on article reviewing since that exchange. A quick look through his talk page—with negative feedback about his CVU patrolling, new page patrolling, RfA conduct, asking to become an NPP coordinator while still on a trial, all from this month—shows that I'm far from the only one worried that this user is biting off more than they can chew. – Joe (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Hey Joe, thanks for the message — I had a chat with Illusion Flame on the community discord server the other day, and whilst I do get your point on potentially controversial WP:PERM requests being handled off-wiki (and, on reflection, I should have asked them to reiterate their comments on-wiki, that's my mistake..) I do try to only make decisions based on on-wiki information. Atsme's comment in that thread (which was indeed the one I was referring to) went some way to assuage the concerns I had specific to the NPP right, which along with becoming an NPP coordinator at least made me lean towards the extension of the permission. I agree that Illusion Flame is biting off more than they can chew (and I've told them as much previously), but so did I way back when — I try to judge the "hat collecting sorts" on the likelihood of them causing damage or disruption, and leave those who are well-meaning but overenthusiastic to figure out "the hard way" why collecting headwear never works out.
All that being said, as you started the DRAFTIFY and hasty reviewing thread, and you note that you do not consider the issue resolved, I'm more than happy to defer to your judgement and undo my change. I have no qualms with being cautious TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 15:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. I agree that these things tend to work themselves out, one way or another. My concern was that if you let people think that chumming up to admins in an off-wiki chatroom is a way to bypass the on-wiki processes everyone else uses, the fallout is going to be worse for everyone involved. – Joe (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Makes sense, and my intention certainly isn't that, so thank you for pointing out how that may look. Just for clarity, did you want me to revert my permissions change? — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 15:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I think that would be for the best. – Joe (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Done TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 17:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello everyone! My internet is going to be shut off in about ~1 hour so I won’t be able to comment here much further. I’m sad to see that @Joe Roe doesn’t think the right was worth extending and I’m interested to hear why they didn’t consider the thread resolved. @Atsme was very clear and I didn’t feel I needed to add anything to her comment. It resolved all of the issues you noted, so I don’t know what’s left to discuss. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Also, there were no issues raised about my vandalism reverting with the counter vandalism academy, nor it that relevant to NPP rights. And I never requested to be a coordinator, I was asked to become one. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
I’ll ping some coordinators to weigh in here: @Zippybonzo, @Atsme - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
I didn't post on your talk page because I wanted to hear from Atsme. Nor, I'm sure, does TNT want to host a discussion about your reviewing here. If you feel the expiration of your NPP right is no longer necessary, then ask for it to be made permanent at WP:PERM/NPP like everyone else. Although personally I would strongly recommend you to just get on with some editing. – Joe (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
I don’t have to justify my actions to you for a second time. Atsme already did so and to repeat it would be a waste of my time. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm going to say that Illusion Flame would do a lot better if they didn't review such controversial articles so soon, I've been a reviewer for a year and a bit, and still don't want to review controversial articles still. I'm not against neither for the perm change, but I don't think asking admins off wiki when the right is controversial is a best practice, as then some hat collector will just ask for as many rights as they can get away with. If you want it extending, do it how everyone else does it, at PERM. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 17:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Just want to note that I had to do that article specifically because it was part of my NPP school training. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
I do say that writing a newsletter isn't that intensive. Given I wanted someone to help with the newsletter, and Illusion Flame is rather competent, I'm going to ignore the coordinator concerns. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 17:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
To be blunt, it's not your place to deal with those concerns, as you're not a lead coordinator. Concerns, at this point in time, should be directed to Novem Linguae as they are the only active lead coordinator. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Since this appears to have been a point of confusion for Illusion Flame as well, it's probably worth pointing out here that the role of NPP coordinator is self-appointed and purely a matter of, as the name suggests, coordinating various routine tasks. The actual NPP permission, like all permissions, is managed by administrators. NPP actions are subject to the same community-based conduct and dispute resolution processes as everything else (talk page discussions, WP:XRV, WP:ANI, etc). NPP coordinators do not have any special role in these processes. – Joe (talk) 04:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I’m not sure where you thought I was confused here. I fully understood this before you made the comment. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-26

MediaWiki message delivery 16:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Wikisaurus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Internal page not linked from anywhere else. Why does this exist?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Plantdrew (talk) 03:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello TheresNoTime,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

Rollback extension

Hi TNT, I was wondering if you could extend my rollback indefinitely, I know it's a few months away, but so far I've enjoyed using the tool and the tools that require it, and would like it extending indefinitely. Best, Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I know this isn’t required or anything, but I can say that Zippy is definitely competent enough for these rights and is now a CVUA instructor. It doesn’t make much sense for him to still have a trial period. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 19:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-27

MediaWiki message delivery 22:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox civil conflict on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Edit filters for old AfDs?

I was wondering whether we have edit filters for old AfDs, that tracks non-bot edits made to AfD pages after their conclusion. There's an AfD I begun at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardar Patel (disambiguation). There is a vandal with 3 usernames that keeps on vandalising this and 4 other AfD pages. Now, my eyes are on the AfD I created, and so are others looking at it, but do we have protection from vandals for AfDs that were closed long ago? Thanks! CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 16:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 July newsletter

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)