User talk:TherasTaneel
Hi, thanks for your message - my error, clicked while distracted - have removed the second mention of Kensington Gradens. Regards Denisarona (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- You are welcome, np. TherasTaneel (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
What is the appropriate way to link to articles in different languages?
[edit]Hi Theras, I noticed this reversion and I've seen similar reversions across the project by editors and bots, but it's not clear to me what the appropriate methodology is for adding language links to articles. Can you point me in the right direction so I can help educate these users? "Use Wikidata" is confusing. 
Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi there, heh, I'm not sure I'm the right person to be asking, but you see the "Languages"-tab on the left of your screen, underneath are an "edit link" where one can add WP in other languages, perhaps you'll find the Wikipedia:Wikidata-page more informational. TherasTaneel (talk) 22:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah! Well that's certainly a good place for me to start looking, and I am somewhat an idiot for not thinking to click on the sprocket. :) Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Np and nah, it's a small thing - easy to overlook. TherasTaneel (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah! Well that's certainly a good place for me to start looking, and I am somewhat an idiot for not thinking to click on the sprocket. :) Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Talk:Liberal Arts (Film)
[edit]Hello TherasTaneel, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:Liberal Arts (Film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 22:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi and thanks, I will at some point, as such pages were speedy deleted in the past. But I'm not overly concerned about its existence. TherasTaneel (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, TherasTaneel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, TherasTaneel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
"Night"
[edit]Do you have any reliable source for your strict time period definitions? In common parlance, if someone died "in the night," he might well have died before midnight. Possibly the person went to bed before midnight, was found dead in the morning, and the exact time of death was not or could not be established. Mewulwe (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- No and I don't know anyone who does. It served to illustrate an example; that they might as well have written evening, yet they didn't. Thus without further details and/or an obituary ad, "natten til lørdag" makes it the 3rd, you don't see such ambiguousness as you suggest in other articles. TherasTaneel (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- They might also as well have written "early on Saturday" yet they didn't. So without further details, it's ambiguous. If you don't see such in other articles, it's because usually there is an unambiguous source and when there isn't, someone is likely to fudge it just like you are doing (certainly the probability is in favour of the later date, as it covers more of what may be considered the "night"), but that doesn't make it right. Mewulwe (talk) 22:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- True - so, let's say the family of a deceased write a certain date in an obituary ad, gets it chiseled in a gravestone and published in a biography, without the absolute certainty of the exact moment of death, as in the examples above. In such a case, do you still suggest to leave it ambiguous indefinitely? TherasTaneel (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- If we know the family don't know it, then yes. Just like we want to record actual birth dates, not some "official" date we know to be inaccurate. However, in the typical case I would accept obituary ads or gravestones, as it is likely enough the family knows the date; it may just not have been precisely reported in the press. Mewulwe (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- True - so, let's say the family of a deceased write a certain date in an obituary ad, gets it chiseled in a gravestone and published in a biography, without the absolute certainty of the exact moment of death, as in the examples above. In such a case, do you still suggest to leave it ambiguous indefinitely? TherasTaneel (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- They might also as well have written "early on Saturday" yet they didn't. So without further details, it's ambiguous. If you don't see such in other articles, it's because usually there is an unambiguous source and when there isn't, someone is likely to fudge it just like you are doing (certainly the probability is in favour of the later date, as it covers more of what may be considered the "night"), but that doesn't make it right. Mewulwe (talk) 22:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TherasTaneel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TherasTaneel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)