User talk:Thefelixsalonga

This is Thefelixsalonga's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2 Cool 2 Be 4gotten (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Specifically needs all available major reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2 Cool 2 Be 4gotten and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefelixsalonga, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thefelixsalonga! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hi. Please note that Wikipedia is not the place for you to promote an un-notable blog. Film reviews should be from actual film critics, not opinion pieces from random blogs. Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second upon my colleague's post here. In regards to your edit in the Bloody Crayons article, you added that "The film received mixed to positive reviews upon its release." Such claims have to be supported by a reliable source; it is stated per MOS:FILM: "The overall critical response to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources.". In addition, the review you retrieved from the Movies For Millennials website is unreliable as reviews from professional critics are more encouraged as also stated in MOS:FILM, "Professional film critics are regarded as reliable sources, though reputable commentators and experts—connected to the film or to topics covered by the film—may also be cited." Best examples of these would be Rappler, ABS-CBN News, or any major newspapers in that film's country of origin.

Finally, I'm quite appalled by how poorly written your edit was; for example, in this sentence "The film received mixed to positive reviews upon it's release," the use of contraction is incorrect. "It's" is a contraction of It is or It has, while "its" is a possessive form of the pronoun it. Hope this makes sense. Slightlymad (talk) 04:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2 Cool 2 Be 4gotten

Hello, Thefelixsalonga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2 Cool 2 Be 4gotten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]