User talk:TheDarlaDimple

February 2017

Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jessa Duggar Seewald have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessa Duggar Seewald. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jessa Duggar Seewald, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 16:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jill Duggar Dillard. General Ization ^Talk 16:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheDarlaDimple, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

General Ization ^Talk 03:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I blocked? TheDarlaDimple (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the multiple warnings above, as well as the investigation that concluded that you engaged in sockpuppetry. You surely cannot claim to have no knowledge of why you were blocked. Are you claiming that these edits [1][2][3], for example, were constructive? General Ization ^Talk 21:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I didn't realize it was such a huge deal. I was just having fun. I'll stop. TheDarlaDimple (talk) 21:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]