User talk:TheCxcx

This is TheCxcx's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drizzle Lomo (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, requires significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources (this excludes blogsites, social media websites and press releases by the artist or the artist's record label).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Drizzle Lomo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Drizzle Lomo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheCxcx! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Michael Ugwu

Hi, I'm JamesG5. TheCxcx, thanks for creating Michael Ugwu!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The Early Life and Career sections are lacking any sources. No sources or explanations for Philanthropy section. Multiple uses of NPOV language to promote the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Versace1608. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Burna Boy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 22:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI and Seyi Shay

Hi TheCxcx,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Since you have established that you are affiliated with the PR firm BukiHQ, you are considered a COI editor and cannot edit the following BLP articles linked below. Per BukiHQ's instagram account, the people linked below are under contract with the firm.

Per WP:COI, please refrained from editing the above articles directly. If you want to see changes made to the articles linked above, please propose them on the articles' talk pages. I advice you to use {{connected contributor (paid)}} when disclosing your COI on talk pages. Please read WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE. In this edit, you replaced Island Records with StarGurl Limited without citing any reason. Do you have a reliable source to suggest that Seyi Shay is no longer signed to Island Records? Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 03:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

   Response: Thank you for bringing me up to speed on this. Proper process is duly noted. Let me state that I edit these articles because the role falls under my purview as a copywriter. I ensure all articles follow Wiki guidelines and have taken all the notes you previously left under advisement. I am a little concerned about the turnaround time, as some of these clients want to see changes as soon as they are requested. Can you give me an idea of what time frame for edits and updates is? RE: Seyi SHay and StarGurl, the PR firm informed me of this change. Supporting link -  https://ynaija.com/seyi-shay-floats-record-label/

To be honest with you, there are only a few reliable editors dedicated to working on Nigerian-related content. We have quite a number of participants at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nigeria, but most of them are not very active. I am going to propose a note on the project's talk page and notified participants to watchlist all of the articles linked above. If you propose changes on the articles' talk pages, those who have these articles watchlisted will be able see your proposal and make the necessary changes/updates per reliable sourcing. Your clients will have to exercise patience and understand that Wikipedia is a community of volunteers who edit in their leisure time. If you put in a request and you feel it is taking too long, you can leave a message at WP:PEN. With regards to the YNaija source you cited, I can add StarGurl to the label field but will not be removing Island Records. The latter can only be removed if Seyi Shay is no longer signed to the label. I hope I was able to answer your questions. Feel free to leave a response here if you have additional questions. Thanks for complying with Wikipedia's policies. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 13:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chidinma

Hi TheCxcx, Is it possible you could contact Chidinma and get her to send an image of herself to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Her wiki bio needs a profile pic. She can sign the declaration of consent form below and attach the image(s) to the email. Please keep in mind that she has to own the copyright to the image(s). If she doesn't own the copyright to the image(s), she needs to contact the copyright owner (aka photographer) and get the person to email a signed declaration of consent form below, with the image(s) attached to the email.

Declaration of consent for all inquiries
I hereby affirm that I choose one: [am name] or [represent copyright holder's name], the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of choose one: [the media work] or [the work depicted in the media] or [both the work depicted and the media] as shown here: [exact URL of the file uploaded on Wikimedia Commons], and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. [Sender's name] [Sender's authority (if applicable. E.g. "Copyright holder", "Director", "Appointed representative of", etc.)] [Date]

Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Funke Adepoju for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Funke Adepoju is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funke Adepoju until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DJ Sose

Hello, TheCxcx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DJ Sose".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Funke Adepoju

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Funke Adepoju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funke Adepoju. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cracker Mallo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cracker Mallo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cracker Mallo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 08:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Funke Adepoju logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Funke Adepoju logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DaviesAyo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DaviesAyo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DaviesAyo

Hello, TheCxcx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DaviesAyo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norrenberger (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norrenberger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Norrenberger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Norrenberger

Hello, TheCxcx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Norrenberger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]