User talk:Thaddeusw

File:Certified-f-900-mixer.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Certified-f-900-mixer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Certified-f-900-mixer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Certified-f-900-mixer.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 07:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Thaddeusw, this image was deleted for a lack of email verification of author permission (OTRS). If you can forward the file author's permission to that email address with a link to the deleted file, they can restore it. czar 17:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Detroit Diesel Series 51

The article Detroit Diesel Series 51 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Where to start... Not easy to read. Visually unappealing. No references. Subject is not demonstrated to be notable, and has limited potential. No significant additions in almost five years. Only two articles link here. Google search indicated reliable secondary sources are hard to come by.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ExcitedEngineer (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]