User talk:Tejano512

This is Tejano512's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manor New Technology High School has been accepted

Manor New Technology High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capitol Area Council (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capitol Area Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Broken Arrow (video game) (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite some articles, appears to be WP:TOOSOON. I recommend waiting until closer to release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Broken Arrow (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of McCoy's Building Supply for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McCoy's Building Supply is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McCoy's Building Supply until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cutlass ^Ciera 01:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capitol Area Council (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing is mainly primary or mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capitol Area Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tejano512! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESPN College Gameday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Clemson vs. Texas CFP football game

Please see (and join in, if you'd like) discussion at: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Standalone CFP first round articles. Dmoore5556 (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dmoore5556 (talk) 22:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SMU

Hi, I've reverted your edit about the Florida State Guard -- while referenced, it is inappropriate for inclusion on the Special mission unit page, as that page is explicitly about military special operations forces; the Florida State Guard is not a military special operations force, regardless of whether they title themselves as such. The material is fine to include on the Florida State Guard page. Please note that [[WP:ONUS|While information must be verifiable for inclusion in an article, not all verifiable information must be included. Consensus may determine that certain information does not improve an article, and other policies may indicate that the material is inappropriate. Such information should be omitted or presented instead in a different article. The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.}} Thanks for your consideration. Best, ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 06:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I re-reverted bc FSG is legally/technically an SDF and under state and federal law SDFs are a military force, even though they might not have full time NatSec/HomeSec duties. And while I did not explicitly state the Florida or it's SG/SDF has an SMU, including it on the page's US section as its own non US Mil section should suffice to say that it has an SMU and is appropriate for inclusion (ex: Listing Australia as a section header and listing it's SMUs within. FSGs SMU is a unit of the FSG and is Florida's designated SMU by law and designation. Tejano512 (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may have a good point here, Tejano, but this discussion should probably be on the SMU talk page, not here. I would suggest you move it over there, and use the {{Moved to}} and {{Moved from}} templates along with it. (jmho) - wolf 10:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]