Jump to content

User talk:Tedder/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15

St. Paul's School

Tedder, thanks so much for your very helpful feedback of St. Paul's School that you provided on Kudpung's talk page. As you asked, I pasted your thoughts on the article's talk page (the thread is "Other discussions"). I agree with all of your points and made the changes to the article with this edit. However, another editor immediately reverted it with this edit. I restored the changes and asked him to follow procedure by getting consensus on the talk page to restore any of the content. Lootbrewed (talk) 19:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Please also note that editor, with whom I've had previous run-ins, followed me to the article (he had never edited it prior to today, and I had been editing it for a couple weeks) and posted this bogus "disruptive editing" warning on my talk page. The editor has received several recent warnings from administrators regarding staying off people's talk page's when they ask him (as I did), following editors, and being disruptive overall to the project.[1][2][3] Thanks. Lootbrewed (talk) 19:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Tedder, here are the comments I left on Kudpung's talk page after Lootbrewed's blanket removal of content and edit warring behavior after the removal was reverted: [4]. My comments at Fred Bauder's talk page regarding same are here: [5]. For some reason, Lootbrewed believes the discussion at Kudpung's talk page was a carte blanche to remove a large amount of content at the St. Paul's article; that Kudpung alone okay-ed the content removal. I can't say I've ever seen something like this before in Wikipedia. One editor (allegedly) making a decision without consensus and another editor taking that as license to gut an article. Since Lootbrewed has dragged you into this, I'd be interested in your take on all of it. In spite of Lootbrewed's obvious attempt to poison the well against me here, none of what's going on has anything to do with any past transgressions I may or may not have committed. At this point, it's about what I see as disruptive editing on Lootbrewed's part and his claim that an admin told him to do it. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Tedder, as you will see from the editing history of your talk page, Winkelvi has repeatedly refused to use the appropriate indentation level for his comments and therefore chose to use the same level as me. He apparently feels it's acceptable to ignore the behavioral guidelines about indenting simply to cause an annoyance to another editor. This is yet another example of the conflict he has so often chosen to create with others. In any case, this is the reason I have adjusted my indents. Lootbrewed (talk) 21:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
There is definitely a problem with User:Winkelvi, see [6] and the following sections. He seems to have seen the disputes on the St. Paul's page and saw an opportunity to jump into ongoing disputes User:Lootbrewed was engaged in. Then he came to my talk page to get me involved. User:Fred Bauder Talk 21:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I had the article on my watchlist due to interest in the Owen Labrie case and that's why I saw what was going on. Once I saw Lootbrewed was editing there, I decided to not edit the article unless something urgent needed resolving. When IPs attempted to whitewash the article today, I stepped in and reverted those edits (see here and here). It was a bit later that Lootbrewed then gutted the article section. Knowing he had done so without consensus, I rightly reverted (see here).
Previously, I alerted you to Lootbrewed talking about you at the talk pages of other editors in relation to the article. I did it because I felt you had a right to know he was attempting to circumvent discussion at the article talk page and forum-shop. If you don't want to know about things like that, it's your right. But it's not your right to make assumptions about my motives - which were without fault and not deserving of suspicion on your part. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for that, but you go too far. User:Fred Bauder Talk 22:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Winkelvi, Fred is right. I doubt your explanation will convince anyone. Facts: (1) You've had ongoing run-ins with me over the past several weeks of which many editors and administrators are aware, (2) You never edited the St. Paul's School article before today, (3) You saw from the edit history that I've been heavily involved with the article for a few weeks yet chose to stay instead of move on, and (4) You went directly to the talk page of the editor with whom you saw I had a content dispute (Fred) to persuade him to support you. In terms of my content removal today, I sought guidance from the WikiProject Schools coordinators long before making any changes, so your issuance of a "disruptive editing" warning (one of your hundreds of bogus warnings issued to editors) is indicative of your troublesome behavior. As admin Jehocman told you recently, "you are a catalyst for conflict" and "you are likely to get indefinitely blocked sooner or later". Lootbrewed (talk) 22:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Ugh. I'm unsure how much I want to wade into this. I think the arguments are clear above, but please focus on the *content* and discuss it on the school talk page. tedder (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your input on the article talk page is clearly needed. And any other coordinators who are willing to participate. I tried to do the right thing, but apparently some disagree. I simply wanted to make the article the best it can be. I promise to no longer edit the article, but I would respectfully request that you participate in the discussion to help resolve the matter. Whatever is decided is fine with me. Lootbrewed (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
It's inappropriate to go to so many user talk pages over this issue, and I don't think you are correct on all of the removals of content. tedder (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I simply followed your great recommendations, step by step. If you look at the edits I made, you'll see that. I thought that's what I was supposed to do. If I made a mistake, I'm sorry. I agreed with almost all of what you said and I was excited to improve the article. As I said, I'm not going to edit the article any more, but I hope you or other coordinators will participate in the discussion to get it on a great track. Thanks. Lootbrewed (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Your edits don't match my list. In any case, consensus is key. tedder (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, which of my edits don't match your list? The only one of the eight I altered slightly was maintaining a bit of the socialization content, which I merged into the daily life/culture section. But it seems I followed the other seven bullet points to a tee. Like I said, I tried hard to do the right thing and followed your list one-by-one. Lootbrewed (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
It is basically unfair to ask someone who has not read the references used in an article, or spent hours making edits to the article based on them, to eyeball an article and then make decisions binding on those who are familiar with the references used and actively editing the article. Of course, there are obvious problems, but, absent active involvement, they cannot function as orders to other editors. Once an administrator begins editing, they can't function as an administrator for the purpose of dealing with that article. Anyone's once over has value but is not a binding guideline to further editing. User:Fred Bauder Talk 07:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
We get it already, Bauder. You've said it numerous times in numerous ways on numerous pages. And obviously, I wasn't taking it as "orders", so let's not continue over-dramatizing it. I took it as confirmation of everything I believed already. And contrary to your claim, anyone can read a piece of content and determine if it doesn't belong in an encylopedia. If someone sees a piece of junk or trivial information in an article, it doesn't belong even if it has the best sources in the world. And, obviously, an admin cannot have a conflict of interest if he's editing an article. So knock off the condescension. The point you seem to be missing in all of this is that my obvious goal was to improve the article and rid it of all the non-encylopedic content that shouldn't have been there in the first place. Did I go about it the right way? No. Thus my promise above to not edit it any more. Now please fuck off. I don't need to be continually lectured by an editor who inserted all this nonsense into the article. Lootbrewed (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Don't use my talk page to continue this conversation. tedder (talk) 20:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Big Cat Rescue

Hello Tedder, as you have dealt with edit-warring in this article in the past (far far back in 2012), just a notification: it seems like the PoV-pushing is occuring again. I am completely uninvolved myself (only noticed the edit via a vandalism filter), and don't know anything about the involved organizations. Maybe it's worth putting the article on watch again for a while to restore the NPOV version, if necessary. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 21:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks- I'll check it out. tedder (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Infosec Taylor Swift

The article Infosec Taylor Swift has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Internet phenomenon

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 05:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Infosec Taylor Swift for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Infosec Taylor Swift is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infosec Taylor Swift until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coderzombie (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

BCR's article

I disagree with some of the changes you made to my edits on Big Cat Rescue's article. 1. You removed a line with allegiations from critics due to being "poorly sourced". I didn't write anything that would suggest that these allegiations were true, merely that they have been raised. I think that the website were the allegiations are raised is a good reference to back up a statement that these accusations were made. 2. You should have taken a closer look at the 10 News video. The animal purchases might have ended by 2001, but the other questionable activities were committed much later. If you have proof that the animal acquisitions ended in 2001, please add references just as I did and clarify that this applies only to the animal acquisitions, not to the other unclean activities. 3. For the same reason, renaming this section from "Controversy" to "Origins" is misleading. I added items that indicate wrongdoing that were committed after BCR started calling itself a sanctuary, and I plan to add more of them. Also, even for activities that have ceased since BCR became a sanctuary a valid point can be raised as to whether this change of heart is genuine or only motivated by financial considerations. 4. Referring me to the talk page is complete nonsense, and you know it. Nobody, not even you, responded to comments that I made on the Talk page while the article was still semi-protected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serval5412 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Please discuss this on the talk page. I'm responding there, it is the place to discuss the contents of the article. What I removed was the most excessive POV issues. Add *neutral* sources, not random blogs, that back it up. tedder (talk) 07:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of E. H. Dyer Construction Company

The article E. H. Dyer Construction Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Valfontis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon/Aunt Betty (non-notable Oregon relative) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sez who. Valfontis (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Someone needs a cookie. Me. But you can have one too. tedder (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Grrr. You're wrong on the internet. Cookies won't fix it. Got anything stronger? Valfontis (talk) 07:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: St. Paul's School

Not sure why you deleted my additions to the Senior Salute section of the article on St. Paul's School. Those facts about Labrie were widely reported in the media: that he was a scholarship student from a modest background who became captain of the soccer team and was awarded the Rector's Award at graduation which was later revoked. Also widely noted was the fact that he was admitted to Harvard but never enrolled. So these facts have no poverty of sources and are not the subject of any reasonable controversy, although partisans of SPS may be anxious that this scandal be minimized and fade from public view. For what it's worth, my grandfather graduated from SPS in 1918. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.242.248.88 (talk) 05:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Discuss on the school page, please. "Your grandfather" is not a source. tedder (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Never claimed he was.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi!
Just thought I'd drop by to say hi! Hope you're keeping well. 5 albert square (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Best wishes for a wonderful 2016!---- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Upcoming Art+Feminism events in Oregon

Art+Feminism logo

You are invited to participate in Oregon's upcoming Art+Feminism events, which will be held in Portland and Eugene on Saturday, March 5, 2016. Please see the following links for additional information, or to sign up:

  • Portland: Yale Union (800 SE 10th Avenue), 12:00–5:00pm
  • Eugene: Architecture and Allied Arts (A&AA) Library (200 Lawrence Hall, University of Oregon), 12:00–5:00pm

About Art+Feminism: Art+Feminism is pleased to announce its third annual Wikipedia edit-a-thon, an all-day event designed to generate coverage of women and the arts on Wikipedia and encourage female editorship. Last year, over 1,500 participants at more than 75 events around the world participated in the second annual campaign, resulting in the creation of nearly 400 new pages and significant improvements to 500 articles on Wikipedia. For more information, see Art+Feminism.

You received this message because you have attended a Wikipedia meetup in Oregon or contributed to WikiProject Oregon. To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for going out of way your way today, even if it was just a little bit. I appreciate your help! --Another Believer (Talk) 23:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. Nice to fix something like that. now I need to dig out photos for this. tedder (talk) 01:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey!

Hi Tedder,

You thanked me for my edits on Mary Pinchot Meyer's article. I am looking for ways to further improve the article. Any ideas? Any areas that you think can be developed further? I was looking into what it means by the status of an article. Mary's article right now is C-Class. I want to bring it to Good Article status. Any tips? Fabrice Soma (talk) 11:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I thanked you because I wanted you to know your efforts are seen and appreciated. I don't have any specific recs, the article has a nice amount of detail really- should probably ping the projects and WP:EAR if they don't reply. tedder (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Biketown page history

I don't currently have the Wikipedia knowledge required to overcome the impasse how to correct the page. It appears that a corporate or cultural bias is preventing accurate information from being displayed on the page I've attempted to edit.

Please help me correct the record. I don't know when I'll have the time to learn how to ensure the accuracy of content I am directly familiar with. Stephenmgunther (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss on Talk:Biketown. tedder (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Tedder. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

List of things named after Donald Trump

Hi Tedder, regarding your protection of List of things named after Donald Trump. The extended confirmed protection option can only be used if semi protection has proven to be ineffective. The page you protected would likely not have enough vandalism to be semi protected based on the edits to the page so far. Would you be willing to consider either removing your protection or changing it to pending changes? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

@Callanecc: Thanks- I didn't know it was still in limited use- I'll move it to 'pending'. tedder (talk) 02:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kuapay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuapay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuapay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Tedder.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

QuakeFinder

Hi Tedder,

You put some maintenance tags on the QuakeFinder article last April. I've just been doing some work on the article, and I wonder if you could take a look and see if it's improved now. Thanks. JerryRussell (talk) 20:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tedder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Schools

Hi Tedder. Are you still able to be active as a coord on WP:WPSCH? Now that Chris Cooper has retired and is no longer available, it's time to take a good look at how the project can move forward - its focus has obviously shifted over the last 10 years, and it needs some time spending on it in various ways. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

NGVAR/diverse anglophone cultures

Tedder, we need your urgent input at WT:WPSCH please. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I got involved as an admin. tedder (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Appreciate your help. That was getting painful. Thanks and regards. KJP1 (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately, User:Garageland66 has chosen to ignore your block and to continue his edit-warring using an IP address. Please see his latest edit at York House School, Redheath, timed at 22.23 UK time. KJP1 (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

ANI Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Keep Murder of Seth Rich

I think this was inappropriate. I don't know whether you're familiar with the history of this article, the various BLP and UNDUE issues and the recent editing environment surrounding Amercian Politics, the Russians, and Wikileaks. But all of the issues raised at the previous AfD's remain unsettled, and after 2-3 days, all you've got on the AfD page is the editors who've leapt to the page while shutting out the rest of the community that has real-life schedules that don't lend themselves to rapid response. The result may again be keep but I see no benefit in a speedy close egged on by off-topic comments by indignant Keep pov's. Please consider letting this run its course. SPECIFICO talk 16:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Feel free to take it to a noticeboard, though I'd suggest waiting for ~6 months and taking it to AFD again, if there are no further developments it'll become obvious. AFDs in a short period of time while an article is still approximately timely are hard to get through. tedder (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I don't see how that addresses my concern that there is no benefit to a speedy close and that the detriment is that it shuts out others who may have commented had it been left open for more than a few days. I didn't put this up and I don't feel it helps the community to put any additional burdens on volunteer editors such that they need to mount message board threads or re-launch an AfD that's been closed before any of the documented (on the talk page BLPN and previous AfD's) views questioning this article's validity could be offered to the wider community. SPECIFICO talk 19:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
One big benefit is that a whole bunch of people don't have to keep track of a discussion that is going nowhere.Anythingyouwant (talk) 23:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
A self-contradictory statement on its face. SPECIFICO talk 23:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I also think that this "Speedy Keep" after only two days is inappropriate. AfDs usually run for a minimum of seven days. Given the recent edits surrounding this page on its talk page and at BPLN, there are other policy based arguments out there. Steve Quinn (talk) 23:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm more than happy to have an admin undo this. With that many keeps it wouldn't have turned into a delete, and if there are BLPN issues it can be deleted for those reasons, not AFD. Again, nothing's going to happen by discussing it here. Take it to ANI or something. tedder (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Tedder, for everyone's information, how did you happen to see that the AfD seemed ripe to close? I don't really know how these things work. Do you patrol all the AfD's? SPECIFICO talk 03:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
I am not understanding why it would be necessary to have some other admin undo this. Your user page says you are an admin, so you should be able to reopen the AfD if you have decided to do so. Other admins have done so after discussion on their talk page with contravening editors. If you need a formal request, then I request that you reopen the AfD. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

(moving left) I can technically reopen, but I'm refusing to do so because it wasn't going to be deleted at AFD- at best, it would have gotten closed with "no consensus". tedder (talk) 03:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

OK yeah, I misunderstood the point you were getting at in your last comment. I intended to adjust my response, but didn't get back to it in time. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I requested the AfD be reopened by some other Admin at ANI (here is the link). Steve Quinn (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Just to close the book on this. If you don't mind, Tedder, could you answer the question I asked above, "Tedder, for everyone's information, how did you happen to see that the AfD seemed ripe to close?" I know some Admins actively patrol AfDs and other pages that need closes but you don't appear to be active in that role, and indeed are one of the less active Admins. How did it happen that you came to this AfD to close it? Suspicions have been raised on the article talk page and it will be good to clear the air. Please do not take this as any kind of accusation. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 03:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

There's no conspiracy here. There is no cabal. tedder (talk) 04:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Surely you are aware from the words of your visitors here that none of us has accused you or anyone else of any impropriety. And we have noticed that you've repeatedly declined to answer my straightforward and I daresay quite understandable question as to how you, a relatively inactive Admin, stumbled upon this controversial and contentious article's AfD? SPECIFICO talk 04:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
The sarcasm is because this whole thing is absurd. I found the article, it was obvious the AfD wasn't going to go anywhere. I make little changes to random pages all the time. Please stop this silly line of questioning, take it to a noticeboard if you think it's improper. tedder (talk) 04:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Right, we know you found the article, don't we. How? Why? A speedy close to an AfD isn't a "little change to a random page" -- I mean, what page isn't a random page if there's a sample of one? A straight response would do the trick, but the evasive and defensive replies are arousing suspicion among various editors -- expressed on several talk pages and boards. SPECIFICO talk 05:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
I don't have any suspicions. But if I did, I'd follow the guidance at ANI to file an appeal at WP:DRV.Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) I'm really sorry to disagree with you, Tedder - unilaterally deciding that "it was obvious the AfD wasn't going to go anywhere". I have to question whether it is really within your purview to offhandedly decide to speedy close an AfD after only two days. I am trying to think back, and I can't recall coming across an AfD that was closed after only two days - and then everyone involved said this was OK. The normal procedure is seven days, and AfDs frequently run for 14 days - in my experience. Sometimes they go a little longer than that. I am trying to be amicable here but... Steve Quinn (talk) 06:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
And I have to agree this wasn't a "little change to a random page". ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
  • Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
  • A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017)

You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (415 Southwest 10th Avenue #300, Portland 97205) on Saturday, March 18, 2017 from 10:00am – 5:00pm. For more information, visit Eventbrite.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

added TheDJ
removed Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
  • The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
  • An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
  • After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

  • After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
  • Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon @ PNCA Library (April 29, 2017)

You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Pacific Northwest College of Art (PNCA) Library at 511 NW Broadway on Saturday, April 29, 2017, from 11am to 4pm. For more information, visit the Facebook event page.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

added Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim
removed Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Meetup Invitation

You are invited to the upcoming Asian Pacific American Heritage month edit-athon.

This will be held on the first floor of the Knight library at the University of Oregon.

For more information please see: Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA, a Facebook event link is also available on the Meetup page.

  • Date: Friday, May 26, 2017
  • Time: 12:00 pm – 4:00 pm
  • Location: Edminston Classroom, Knight Library, Room 144
  • Address:1501 Kincaid Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1299

Hope to see you there!

(This message was sent to WikiProject members via Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA/MailingList on 23:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC). To opt-out of future messages please remove your name from the mailing list.)

Jamison Square

If you're interested, you might take a look at this diff re: Jamison Square. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pluribus International Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pluribus International Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pluribus International Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  09:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride at PNCA: Tuesday, June 27

You are invited to the upcoming Wiki Loves Pride edit-athon, which will be held at the Pacific Northwest College of Art (511 NW Broadway) on Tuesday, June 27, 2017, from 5–8pm. For more information, visit the meetup page or Facebook event page.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22 • Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Article re-review: Dial-A-Truck - DAT Solutions

As you reviewed this page about Dial-a-truck in 2009, would you mind taking another look at it based on the latest edits that I posted this last week? I would greatly appreciate your feedback. I would like to move the page to DAT Solutions once it is no longer considered a stub. — RossO : talk 06:27, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added Nakon • Scott
removed Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
removed Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming Wikipedia edit-a-thon dedicated to artists of color - Thursday, Oct. 26 at PNCA

Main page: Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland/Artists of Color

On Thursday, October 26, a Wikipedia edit-a-thon dedicated to artists of color will be held from 4–8pm at the Pacific Northwest College of Art (511 NW Broadway). Learn more at Facebook. Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
removed Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

A goat for you!

You're still here, tedder--thanks for all the time you have devoted to our beautiful project...

Drmies (talk) 01:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, to you too drmies (talk · contribs) :) tedder (talk) 22:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Independendent schools

Please see: User talk:Kudpung#User:Garageland66, then this edit. The editor has a growing block log (you blocked twice already) and I'm not much disposed towards tolerance for what is now clearly WP:TEND and an attempt to test our patience. Thoughts? FYI: John from Idegon, KJP1. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

I've no problem with him updating the fees. But he's using this, and misleading edit summaries, to shoehorn in his view that they should be described as private schools rather than independent schools, despite having raised that issue repeatedly and completely failed to get consensus. His self-described affiliation is quite clear; "Communist, trade unionist and anti-austerity campaigner". I'm really not sure he wants to build an encyclopedia, as opposed to using Wikipedia to push his own agenda. KJP1 (talk) 22:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Done. It seems they could be a great user but they've refused to color inside the lines. tedder (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Appreciated. It is a pity. As you say, he could contribute effectively, but he just can't drop the stick. KJP1 (talk) 05:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tedder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

added Joe Roe
readded JzG
removed Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

added Muboshgu
readded Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned
removed None

Bureaucrat changes

readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Blurpeace • Dana boomer • Deltabeignet • Denelson83 • Grandiose • Salvidrim! • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

added Lourdes†
removed AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon: Jewish Women Artists (March 8, Oregon Jewish Museum)

On March 8 (International Women's Day), the Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education and artist Shoshana Gugenheim will be hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon to create and improve Wikipedia articles about Jewish women artists. Click here for more information. You can also express interest or suggest articles to create or improve here. This event is free and open to the public, and will serve as both a public art action and a public educational program. Participation is welcome in person and remotely (for those outside of Portland). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon (March 10, Pacific Northwest College of Art)

On Saturday, March 10 (11am to 4pm), the Pacific Northwest College of Art (PNCA) will be hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon to create and improve Wikipedia articles about art, feminism, and women. You can read details on the Facebook event page, or this Wikipedia meetup page. Tutorials for new editors, reference materials, childcare, and refreshments will be provided. Bring your laptop, power cord and ideas for entries that need updating or creation. For the editing-averse, you're welcome to stop by to show your support! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kuapay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuapay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuapay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Amazon Web Services

Hi Tedder, thanks you for your arbitration in Amazon Web Services. Just wondering if page should not be in its original state, with List of products, until some kind of consensus is meet. Page has been edited many times and reviewed and that information was approved until now. I do not see any reason to remove it if there is no consensus. Just wondering. Anyway Thank you. Tech201805 (talk) 12:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

It doesn't really matter- there isn't much reason to take sides on it, having the information there (or not there) during a page-protected period doesn't hurt anything. I mean, it isn't like it's harmful information about a person. Just put energy towards discussing it instead. tedder (talk) 16:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
OK. Thanks for your information. Tech201805 (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

added Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
readded Gogo Dodo
removed Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes

removed Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ahad Raza Mir

I approached yesterday the administrator who shifted this article to draft he is busy and has asked me to contact other administrator to look into. As I told him that now article subject has substantial references and can be moved to article main space with constructive editing, which I am willing to do, like adding references, changing it manual of style, so please look into the draft. I can move the article after providing suitable citation, but wanted to ask first. Nauriya, Let's talk - 23:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Nauriya! I'd suggest using the good folks at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation to help you with a review. You can invite them to look at the page by adding this wikicode to the top of the page: {{subst:submit}}. There might be a delay but those people should be really good at reviewing and helping you out. tedder (talk) 00:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you actually I am not the creator and nominator of the article. I just needed "some sort" of permission before I could improve myself and move the article to mainspace. As admin Joe Decker has green-lit me to move it to mainspace after improving it, I will do that. If any objection comes along I will ask for their help. Nauriya, Let's talk - 11:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

added Sro23
readded KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
  • Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz
renamed Optimist on the run → Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

added Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

added Justlettersandnumbers • L235
removed Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter

Interface administrator changes

added Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333

Oversight changes

removed Guerillero • NativeForeigner • Snowolf • Xeno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tedder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

readded Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz
removed Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike

Interface administrator changes

removedDeryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia Editathon: The Visibility Project - Saturday, January 19

Make+Think+Code and the Pacific Northwest College of Art are hosting a Wikipedia editathon at the Shipley Collins Mediatheque (511 NW Broadway) on Saturday, January 19 from 10am to 2:30pm. The purpose of the event is to make Wikipedia a more vibrant, representative, inclusive and diverse resource. Please visit Wikipedia:Meetup/MakeThinkCode/TheVisibilityProject for more information. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tedder/Archive_13&oldid=1077935169"