User talk:Tcini09
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Tcini09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Tcini09, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Werter1995 (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tcini09
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Tcini09 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Werter1995 (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit]
Hello! I'm EmilySarah99. Your recent edit(s) to the page Grand Duchess Anna Petrovna of Russia appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EmilySarah99 (talk) 07:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Seek consensus
[edit] Hi Tcini09! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Grand Duchess Anna Petrovna of Russia several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Grand Duchess Anna Petrovna of Russia, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Thinker78 (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have stated why but every fucking time someone changes it Tcini09 (talk) 08:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm Sira Aspera. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.
Sira Aspera (talk) 10:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Hello, I'm Sira Aspera. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Sira Aspera (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sira Aspera (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I need help to add content on to Selim III Giray's page but I am being accused of vandalism. I'm new and not sure how it works. That's all I want Tcini09 (talk) 15:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop adding parents/spouses/children without providing a credit to a reliable source. Otherwise it is original research and may be a reason for blocking. Thank you Sira Aspera (talk) 18:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Anna-Maria Frel moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Anna-Maria Frel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Sira Aspera (talk) 08:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)