User talk:Talibul Ilm

Re: adh Dhahabi

Thanks for the comment. I wasn't the one who originally put the link there, but this is from I believe the first or second paragraph from that page:
"The Salafiyyah movement to return Islam to it's purest roots (like the Islamic Amish!) has taken as reference points the teachings of Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal , Al Barbahaaree, or Al Laalikaa'ee, or Ash-Shaatibee, or Adh-Dhahabee, or Al Layth ibn Sa'd, or Abu Haneefah, and other scholars who adhered to the methodology of the salaf."
What you could do is just include both, as being Salafi doesn't negate following one of the four madhhabs either. You seem like a reasonable guy, so i'll trust your judgment. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The meaning could go either way. I would keep in mind, though, that even the modern Salafi movement doesn't prohibit the following of a madhhab. Guys like Bin Baz and Albani, whom Salafis tend to follow, were only against the blind following of a madhhab without proofs, not of following them in general. In fact the majority of Albani's fiqh rulings were the same conclusions as the Maliki madhhab. So technically, it is possible to be both one and the other. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Talibul Ilm! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)