User talk:Talencar

Welcome!

Hello, Talencar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like DotSUB, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Zeus-^u|c 03:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DotSUB

A tag has been placed on DotSUB, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Zeus-^u|c 03:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Thiessen

Hi. I'm afraid I've just removed most of the text you recently added to this article. The main problem is that our rules about Biographies of living people require good sources for all controversial claims, and Media Matters is an advocacy group, not a reliable source. Another problem is that we cannot cite videos of the Amanpour interview from YouTube etc because they are technically copyright violations. (If we could find a video of the interview on cnn.com, or even a transcript, that would be fine.)

Please don't let this put you off contributing to Wikipedia in general or that article in particular. We understand that it takes several months to really understand the rules here.

Cheers, CWC 14:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://fedpubs.com/subject/govern/arar.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Proulx (RCMP officer)

Hi Talencar: Regarding Richard Proulx (RCMP officer), please note that I have modified the name slightly so as to be in accord with the Wiki Manual of Style. More importantly -- Richard Proulx simply does not belong in the array of categories that are, of course, proper for Maher Arar. It was rather confusing to find him listed there. I've remedied that situation, so for future reference, please be careful not to assign inappropriate categories to other articles that you may create or edit. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I would just like to remind you in a friendly way not to remove the information header at the Wikipedia sandbox, and other sandboxes, or make any other inappropriate edits, such as adding libelous, offensive, or copyrighted material. You are free to test your editing skills there, but please follow the instructions stated on the page. Good luck with your editing and thank you for your co-operation. Hazard-SJ^Talk 21:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherene H. Razack

The article Sherene H. Razack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aziz al-Abub

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Operation Dormouse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Dormouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Dormouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [UseTheCommandLine ~/talk] #_ 04:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Terrible Mistake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Terrible Mistake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Terrible Mistake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 03:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Your addition to Human Ecology Fund has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elza Soares, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jardim Botânico. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your edit to Domestic violence has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 13:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aziz Choudry

The article Aziz Choudry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aziz Choudry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aziz Choudry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Choudry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 12:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Palace of the End

The article Palace of the End has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The best of available sourcing is uniform and minimal, like is on this page, giving a brief synopsis of the play and little more when anything. Redundant sourcing providing the same minimal general information doesn't give a case for inclusion. Most plays do not have Wiki articles for this reason including most others by this playwright. The sourcing and content on this page are about as good as it gets excluding a few minutiae. Sourcing contradicts each other on the details and sometimes contradict the published play's story. Sourcing includes: a smattering of brief synopses often in the form of a short review of a performance or about an upcoming (from the time of writing of the source) performance, short mentions, product pages for the published play, promos, and similar. The historical information on this article is highly inaccurate and the third of the three characters is fictional which a few sources wisely point out. A note - from searching, there are other works with the title "Palace of the End" unrelated to the play and it is a real place that is mentioned in many non-fiction works and articles unrelated to the play.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]