User talk:Tai3chinirv7ana

Your draft article, Draft:Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka Offensive

Hello, Tai3chinirv7ana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka Offensive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka Offensive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka Offensive, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Tai3chinirv7ana, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moxy 🍁 23:17, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamenets-Podolsky pocket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 7th Panzer Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Your addition to Operation Overlord and Normandy landings has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Its a pitty that you refuse to discuss the matter and continue to make sassy remarks. Of course you are correct that the 9. SS-Panzer and 10. SS-Panzer Divisions were involved in the Kamenets-Podolsky Pocket, I have mixed it up while looking through Frieser's work, even though he claims 55,000 diff. Please take my apology. Regards.Wildkatzen (talk) 11:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka Offensive

Hello, Tai3chinirv7ana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka Offensive.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamenets-Podolsky pocket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1st Guards Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Polesskoe Offensive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Polesskoe Offensive, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tai3chinirv7ana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Moxy 🍁 13:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Burden

Will give you a day to comply with WP:Burden.--Moxy 🍁 14:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tai3chinirv7ana,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tai3chinirv7ana,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tai3chinirv7ana,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Polesskoe Offensive concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Polesskoe Offensive, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Polesskoe Offensive

Hello, Tai3chinirv7ana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polesskoe Offensive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Polesskoe Offensive

Hello, Tai3chinirv7ana,

Thank you for creating Polesskoe Offensive.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This description is very different from the one at Dnieper–Carpathian Offensive.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 16:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dnieper–Carpathian Offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Han Hyo-joo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. As per consensus at WT:KO (search through the archives), no guesting are allowed for inclusion in South Korean BLP articles. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dnieper–Carpathian offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fait Accompli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dnieper-Carpathian Offensive

Hi! I recently edited the page on the Dnieper-Carpathian Offensive which you reverted. I wanted to discuss changes to the article with you on the Dnieper-Carpathian Offensive talk page as you appear to be the only person actively editing the page. Originalcola (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actual German strength

Hey, Tai3chinirv7ana! How did you find this information: 06:35, 23 April 2022 diff hist +880‎ Battle of the Dnieper ‎ Added actual German strength for this battle straight from the archives. Do you have access to the archives? I would like to find information on the actual strength of each German army on the eastern front. I did not find information on the Internet.--Vaclaw1990 (talk) 04:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vaclaw1990,

I am a researcher into the German and Soviet archives, so I have tons of information about the German side with regards to their strength, losses, divisions and so on.

Are you interested in more of this? Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Tai3chinirv7ana! Yes, very interesting) The strength of the German armies on the EF. 1942-1944)Vaclaw1990 (talk) 07:57, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nikopol-Krivoy Rog offensive casualties

Hi, thanks for adding a more accurate German casualty figure to the article. Have you come upon any sources that give insight into Soviet losses during the battle? In researching back when I worked on the article I dug around a lot on Pamyat Naroda, but couldn't find any mention of casualties in the posted reports. ~~~~ Kges1901 (talk) 22:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I did researching into the docs of the 3rd Ukrainian Front too, but haven't found a doc showing the front losses for February 1944. To add further, the same goes for March-April 1944. Starting from May 1944 is when the monthly losses are available.

I've been adding tons of data from both German and Soviet primary sources into the various articles, including the follow-up Soviet offensive after the Nikopol-Krivoy Rog Offensive, so the losses of the 3rd UF interested me.

The only thing that's available is Krivosheyev's book about Soviet losses, where the losses of the 3rd UF during the Dnieper-Carpathian Offensive (January-April 1944) are given. However, no breakdown is available as to the losses in February.

My reasonable estimate, based on monthly losses of other fronts and other docs, would be that the 3rd UF sustained around 60,000 casualties.

With regards to the losses of the A.O.K. 6 in February 1944, they are still incomplete. While the document I used provide a complete breakdown of losses for each army division and GHQ combat units, it also states that for the 62. and 123. Infanterie-Divisionen, 16. Panzergrenadier-Division and 97. Jäger-Division the losses are only for the first half of February (1-15), as it was impossible to compile exact losses for the second half of the month due to chaotic situation.

Both the 62. and 123. ID would be disbanded the following month due to heavy losses, the remnants of the 16. PGD will be sent to France (OB West) for rebuilding and reorganization into the 116. Panzer-Division, while the 97. JD will be badly depleted.

Finally, it doesn't include losses of various Flak units in the army area, which are under Luftwaffe subordination, nor does it include whatever Wehrmacht Gefolge (Reichsarbeitsdienst, OT, Nationalsozialistische Kraftfahrkorps, Deutsche Reichsbahn) personnel that were attached to the army.

So with that in mind, the overall losses of the 6th Army for February would be around 30,000. This goes in line with report of overall losses for Heeresgruppe A in February 1944. Its losses for February 1944 amounted to 40,000. A fraction of them can be attributed to the 17th Army cut off in Crimea, which had a quiet month. Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 13:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I recently made important additions to the Nikopol-Krivoy Rog Offensive. Speaking of the follow-up offensives, specifically the April 1944 Odessa Offensive, there's still no page on wiki. Can you assist me in creating it- it can be a basic one, largely translation of Russian page on this.

I could do it myself, but I simply don't have enough time to do it. However, I do have a wealth of information on the German side (strength, losses, order of battle etc.) from primary sources, as well as Soviet, so I wanted to create this page. Plus, it already has enough photos, with the famous photo of tank riders on T-34 advancing near Razdelnaya station.

So simply a creation of the page, attaching it as a part of the Dnieper-Carpathian Offensive, providing basic info. Then I can fill it up with more details and such.

Since you've done lots of editing on the Eastern Front articles and Soviet side, perhaps you can assist me, by giving a kick-start to this article?

Regards Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 07:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, I can write up a quick summary from Glantz's Red Storm in the Balkans, then enhance it with information from Russian sources. Kges1901 (talk) 10:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've already started creating it. Will publish it soon. For the beginning it will be basic summary, together with military infobox. Based on that, we can continue to fill it up step by step, to make it a quality article. Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 10:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just did a quick write up in mainspace at Odessa Offensive. Kges1901 (talk) 11:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I will add lots of data soon and improve upon what you wrote.

Speaking about article creation, improvement etc., would you like to team up/cooperate with me on this? Like me, I can see that you've done lots of them on the war topics and I'm a researcher into the Soviet and German archives, so we can make plenty of improvements.

The only thing with me, like I've said already, is that I don't have time to do long edits. So since I'm a researcher, I prefer to add various stats and facts, not to write entire articles- strength reports, losses, OOB, other reports. For example, in the Battle of the Dnieper article, the German strength (personnel, armoured, aircraft) is entirely my work.

When it comes to the article improvement, the Dnieper-Carpathian offensive is my main interest. As you can see there, overwhelming majority of info there is added by me. One thing that I did not touch upon there, cause I didn't have time, is editing the brief, basic description of offensives there. Whoever made them 10-15 years ago clearly didn't know anything about the offensives.

For example, in describing the Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka offensive, nothing is described about it, instead, Kamenets-Podolsk Pocket is described. Similarly, in describing the Polesskoe offensive (several years ago I made an article about it), nothing is described about it, instead, Bereznegovatoye–Snigirevka offensive is described. So in this regard, the article is a mess. Not to mention that they all are extremely limited. Correcting the major mistakes of the past editors would be nice.

Also, I have a question about uploading photos. I'm not a specialist here, but from what place (site etc.) would it be considered 'safe' to upload without all that copyright stuff? I can suggest some places from where to take them and if you know the procedures of uploading that would be great- all these articles would be far more attractive with them, supporting the main text.

Regards Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely be able to cooperate, and I appreciate your research as it helps provide more information about the impacts of the battles of 1943-1944 on the German forces. I have long wanted to tackle the main battles of the Eastern Front like the Battle of the Dnieper, but the scale is too daunting for one person alone. I do find it more interesting to write about the history of less well-known operations like the Dnieper–Carpathian Offensive because there is so much information in English about the battles of 1941, Kursk, and Stalingrad but the campaigns of 1944 are more obscure. For photos, you need to prove publication in the relevant country based on the copyright laws of them. For example, in Russia the main source for photos is mil.ru (the official website of the Ministry of Defense) because files from there are licensed in a way that they can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons; and there's many World War II photos that have been posted on there recently. Otherwise it would have to comply with Russian copyright law. I'm not familiar with German copyright however. Kges1901 (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with what you said, about the over-represented battles in literature vs the ones that are under-represented. For future discussions and cooperation, is there a way to contact you, beyond this? Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can email me here. Kges1901 (talk) 18:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what the problem is, but I cannot access the link you've added. At the top it says ''No send address'', while the message says that ''You must be logged in and have a valid authenticated email address in your preferences to send email to other users. Return to Main Page.'', even though I'm logged in and have email. What would be the issue? Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 18:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your email might not be authenticated. I can't email you, might be because you don't have a user page. Kges1901 (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably because I don't have user page. I will try that later. Also, thanks for adding Soviet OOB on the Odessa Offensive page. Later I will add German OOB, with plenty of data on the low strength of German diivisions, their poor shape etc. Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried emailing you on my end and it says that you don't have "a valid email address" specified. Kges1901 (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I doubled checked and yes, it wasn't confirmed. I also created my user page. Now its ok. Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for your hard work on these issues which this site is systemically biased against. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Buckshot06, I appreciate it. Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 04:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tai3chinir7ana, what does your username refer to? A Russian word, but what? Also, feel free to pull in Wreck Smurfy, who is the other current active member of the Red Army editor's group named for Tukhachevsky(!!), he focuses on writing up rifle divisions, so do talk to him and see if you can transfer some of his already drafted prose including both Western, Glantz, Sharp, and Soviet sources sometimes; B.Velikov is amazing but focuses on more modern activities. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My username has nothing to do with Russian word(s). Its a combo of Chinese Tai chi philosophy and martial art, and Nirvana concept found in various Indian religions.

I considered changing it, but didn't do it yet, So it stayed the same from the day I created my account here 6 or 7 years ago.

Thanks for informing me about these editors. Tai3chinirv7ana (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]