User talk:Svm1 63

Earlier Discussions:
User talk:Svm1 63/archive 01	User talk:Svm1 63/archive 02	User talk:Svm1 63/archive 03

Copyright problem: Mohan Munasinghe

Hello. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mohan Munasinghe, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://dsds.teriin.org/dsds2002/speakers/Munasinghe.htm http://dsds.teriin.org/2003/speakers/munasinghe.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mohan Munasinghe and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mohan Munasinghe with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mohan Munasinghe. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mohan Munasinghe saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maradankadawala Yakadaya is also a copyright problem and is tagged for investigation. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have also listed Munidasa Cumaratunga and Jayantha Chandrasiri for further examination. I realize that much of this was added some time ago, but given that you were notified of our copyright policies in March, 2008 and evidently continued placing material from other sites here, as suggested by the Corensearchbot notices above, I am requesting assistance in evaluating your contributions more deeply for additional concerns. If you are aware of any other articles into which you may have copied material from previously published sources, please help identify these. Very rarely does Wikipedia's copyright policy permit copying from such sources, and quite likely any such text you may have copied here will have to be removed. I am watchlisting your page so we may discuss the matter further. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copying text within Wikipedia

Just as you cannot copy text from other sources, you also cannot copy text from one Wikipedia article into a new one, unless you are the sole contributor. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material into public domain, but license it for reuse provided that their content is attributed. If you wish to split out material from one article in a new article, you must provide credit. See Wikipedia:Split for more information. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles that infringe copyright on Wikipedia

With respect to the note that you left User:MBisanz here, the article was deleted from the space Munidasa Cumaratunga. What was deleted at Kumarathunga Munidasa was a redirect you had created which was no longer useful without the article.

You were notified of the copyright concerns with Munidasa Cumaratunga on July 3rd, at which time the article was blanked to allow interested contributors to create a new version without copyright infringement. The article was not deleted until July 12th. You had been actively editing between those dates but did not respond to copyright concerns or take any steps to create a clean version of the article. Neither did any other editor. Every version of this article in its history contained a substantial copyright problem. While I will sometimes myself rewrite articles on notable subjects where this is the case, as I did with the article you wrote for Mohan Munasinghe, this is not possible with every article. If there isn't a clean version and nobody creates one, we sometimes have no choice but to delete articles altogether. It is better to have no article than to have one that is hosted here illegally. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was not very active in Wikipedia during that time. I HAD 2 ASSIGNMENTS TO SUBMIT! GEEZ! --Svm1 63 (talk) 09:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even had you not been active at all, the articles would have been deleted after a week. However, uploading new material really shouldn't have been your priority here. I'm not sure if you understand the seriousness of this situation. You can be blocked from contributing to Wikipedia for copying material from non-free sites. That's because doing this is against the law of the United States, where Wikipedia is based. You can get Wikipedia into legal trouble doing this, and Wikipedia can't allow it. At the bottom of every edit screen, it says, "Only public domain resources can be copied without permission—this does not include most web pages or images." and "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted." In response to your note below, it isn't a question of writing your own opinion, but writing information in your own words. The law protects creative expression. The language a source uses is protected, as is the "structure" of the piece. (See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing if you want to know more.) But facts in it are not.

I'm sure nobody wants to see you blocked from contributing, and it's not by any means my intention to make you feel threatened with regards to text you've already uploaded. But I want to be sure that you understand this so you'll realize that you must not do it again. This is an important issue to Wikipedia. Material that is pasted here is removed or hidden as soon as it is discovered. Sometimes this means the whole article is instantly deleted. Sometimes a week is permitted to allow contributors a chance to write a new article. But either way, the copyrighted text must go. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can help with the new article you've created on Kumarathunga Munidasa. But there should be no more copy pasting from other sites or even from Wikipedia's own pages. What we do is obtain the information from reliable sources and present them in an article. Simply put, we give it in our own words and give that source as a reference. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously, and something (even a small part) taken word to word from another source is a violation of it. As Wikipedia:Copyright violations says, any such material should be removed. Cheers and hope to see you around. ≈ Chamal ^talk +Under house arrest!+ 11:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. i'll write my opinion. ofcos, u wud say it's not very encyclopedic to write ones own opinion either :-/ --our writings are governed by our thoughts 09:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No no, not opinion. Just presenting the facts in our own words. Our own opinion would be original research which is not allowed either. Sorry if this is confusing. You recent edits to the article were allright. If you want to know how to add references, check how the current book reference is added. ≈ Chamal ^talk 10:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok ok :D--our writings are governed by our thoughts 11:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Svm1 63/personalbarnstar/mahasena

You initially created this barnstar at Editing User:Svm1 63/personalbarnstar/mahasena, which resulted in an article being created in the main namespace. I assumed this was a mistake and moved it to User:Svm1 63/personalbarnstar/mahasena, and I have tagged the original page for deletion. Let me know if this was in error. Singularity42 (talk) 22:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC) ahh thanx!--User: Svm1_63 13:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natha deviyo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Natha deviyo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 11:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Svm1 63! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Suranga Chandratillake - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Svm1 63. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Naga people (Lanka), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jayantha Chandrasiri

The article Jayantha Chandrasiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC & WP:GNG. The external links are IMDb (an unreliable source) and a blogsite.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Svm1 63. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naga people (Lanka)

Hi there, G7 does not apply to the article, since it's been substantially modified by a lot of other editors. You're going to have to use AfD for it - if you need instructions, see WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks, ansh 666 07:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Svm1 63. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ariya-vamsa Deshana (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.028.than.html, https://damsara.org/dhamma-talks-in-sinhala/past-dhamma-talks-of-meetirigala-nissaranavanaya-monastery/ariyawansa-desana_2008-to-2010/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Ariya-vamsa Deshana may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Svm1 63! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anuradha Seneviratna

The article Anuradha Seneviratna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability criteria for academics

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 17:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]