User talk:SvetiNikolay

SvetiNikolay, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SvetiNikolay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kubrat, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SvetiNikolay, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 14:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have only 1 account which I recently registered. I attempted dispute only on ONE of the articles which you familiar with,but you did not respond to my dispute. About the Kubrat change, I did it with this account and only with it. I am not quiet sure what do you mean if I am cooperating with other people on requesting edit or editing. I have only 1 account,and the dispute on the Bulgars article you can see my IP on it,i did not register my account yet. So your statement is false. I do everything myself with 1 account only. Take that into consideration. Thanks

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, SvetiNikolay. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kubrat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kubrat was changed by SvetiNikolay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856117 on 2021-07-17T15:57:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]