User talk:SugnuSicilianu

Hi Angelo - welcome the English wikipedia. I'm not sure if you are aware, but there is also a Sicilian wikipedia (I'm a bureaucrat on it). Salutamu e a prestu. πίππύ δ'Ω∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 04:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC) ps if I'm not mistaken there was an article in the most recent edition of Arba Sicula on the Siculo-American (and Australian) mutual aid societies.[reply]

Good Question

Thanks for the good question surrounding the History of NFL Championships article. I know it seems confusing when the issue comes up about the situation of titles surrounding the first four super bowls. Since during the first four super bowls, the leagues were divided into two, the Super Bowl or AFL-NFL World Championship Game as it was known for the first two years, the winning team essentially won bragging rights, a cool trophy, and called themseleves the World Champion. Record books and the Pro Football Hall of Fame, the Green Bay Packers website, and other sources state these facts, if the winning team won the NFL Championship and then the Super Bowl only the Super Bowl would be recognized as the team's championship that year. If the team lost the Super Bowl, then the official record books still record the NFL Championship as a league title. So in fact during those four years, there were two league champions, but only one world champion. That can be seen on the list toward the bottom of the screen. I believe that since the NFL name and history was retained and the AFL history added to it, this makes for a bit of confusing and termoil during the 60's and the NFL instead of discrediting all AFL reocrds and titles, it merged them into the NFL history books. This is why the league itself is divided into pre-merger and post-merger eras because essentially the league was reborn in 1970. Thanks for your question, and I understand your confusion as I myself do not understand the concept behind this. --Happyman22 14:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for the comments, and I'm sorry if it seemed like I disrespected the AFL. I have reworked that table a bit so if you would like to check it out and give some comments I would appreciate it. --Happyman22 04:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mazzarino

Of course, we are speaking of the cultural milieu and appartenance, not strictly of a nation. So I reverted your edit. Bye and good work. --Attilios 22:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFL draft

Hello, I noticed you are very interested in American Football League players and to modify the box if a player played for a team in the sixties and seventies (example: Emmitt Thomas, who played for the Kansas City Chiefs in the 60's in the AFL and 70's in the NFL). That's fine for me. But I will diasagree in respect to the AFL Draft. From 1967 through 1969 both leagues, the NFL and the AFL had the same Draft, so tt's uneccesary to change in the box "NFLDraft" to "AFLDraft", since both leagues had the same Draft.Gypaetus 01:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask

Are you the person formerly known as RemembertheAFL? Soxrock 18:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:1960Fleer96Lucas.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:1960Fleer96Lucas.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you might be interested

I invite you to join the new American Football League project, which is meant to enhance all American Football League related articles. Please alert me if you are interested. Thanks Soxrock 18:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know by now that you have vast knowledge of the AFL. An area that you could help in is, like you said, areas that would change wrong NFL records into AFL ones. It would help cleanup the place and it would be in your comfort zone. Really, though, do what you want. I'm focusing on creating player pages. Thanks for your participation! Soxrock 22:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sports cards

Hello - just wanted to let you know that per the guidelines laid out on Wikipedia:Non-free content, sports cards cannot be used in articles solely to illustrate the subject of the article. Only if the card itself is discussed in the article can a card image be used (and just adding a sentence or two to the image caption would not cut it). If you have any questions let me know. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 00:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Non-free Football card

Template:Non-free Football card has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 00:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Felice Coniglio article

I just stumbled across the article you created about yourself, Angelo Felice Coniglio. You may not be aware, but creating and/or editing a page about yourself, while not strictly forbidden, is strongly discouraged under the site's Conflict of interest guidelines. Please note that I am not suggesting that you do not merit an article on the site, given the press coverage you have received in the past for your AFL association does seem to meet Wikipedia's requirements for notability. If you have any questions on the COI policy please let me know. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 14:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LH-Patch577w.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LH-Patch577w.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:ShawTheOtherLeague.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ShawTheOtherLeague.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 16:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RingErn1964AFLlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:RingErn1964AFLlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RingErn1964Name.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:RingErn1964Name.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I, Soxrock, award you the Working Man's Barnstar for your hard work to all articles related to the American Football League. I love your work and keep up the great work here. Soxrock^Talk/_Edits 00:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RemiRingAFLlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:RemiRingAFLlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RemiRingName.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:RemiRingName.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Common Draft in infoboxes

In the Jim Kiick and Larry Csonka articles, the infobox says "NFL Draft"; shouldn't it say "Common Draft," since they were drafted in 1968? I'd fix it myself but for fear of screwing it up. 65tosspowertrap 17:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TitansProgram1962w380.png

Thanks for uploading Image:TitansProgram1962w380.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AFLW-Uniform-KC.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:AFLW-Uniform-KC.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AFLW-Uniform-KC-Patch.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:AFLW-Uniform-KC-Patch.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ChiefsMediaGuide700w.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ChiefsMediaGuide700w.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 11:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AlworthLance1965SICover.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AlworthLance1965SICover.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Famous Neighborhoods

I have nominated Category:Famous Neighborhoods (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite ^Talk 10:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA thanks

I have been quite delinquent. I should have sent this some time ago. Thanks for getting this article started:

This user helped promote Jack Kemp to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:OfficialAFL50thLogo175h.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:OfficialAFL50thLogo175h.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 22:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFL 50th Anniv. logos

Hi Angelo,

Knowing the users who edit frequently here, they are going to eventually want to upload and use the official 50th anniv. logos designed by the teams themselves. Some of them are currently posted on their official web sites:

Thus, the self-made logos you recently uploaded will get removed from the articles and probably will eventually get deleted. So it's probably best to keep them on your RememberTheAFL web site. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bills50thLogo600w.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bills50thLogo600w.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Chiefs50thLogo600w.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chiefs50thLogo600w.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 04:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Steidel

A tag has been placed on Dave Steidel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 14:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bob Wortman

A tag has been placed on Bob Wortman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AFLRefsUniform.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:AFLRefsUniform.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Angelo Felice Coniglio

I have nominated Angelo Felice Coniglio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Felice Coniglio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. |anon| -20091202212704 21:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ange Coniglio

A tag has been placed on Ange Coniglio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Malleus Fatuorum 20:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello SugnuSicilianu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Peppy Blount - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Amby Schindler - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bob Wortman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bobby Smith (running back) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Charley Brown - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:EquatorCrossingUSSRepublic19411206.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:EquatorCrossingUSSRepublic19411206.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hello. WikiProject National Football League would like to let you know that we are currently trying to switchover all NFLretired infoboxes to NFLactive. The NFLactive infobox can now support retired players, so we would appreciate it if you did not change the NFLactive infobox to NFLretired. Thank you. Also, please note that "American football" is standard in the lead instead of "Professional Football." Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The template was originally named "NFLactive", because it was only for active players in the NFL to go along with "NFLretired." However, the NFLactive infobox has been modified so that retired players can now use the template. This is all part of WP:NFL's attempt to have one infobox to support all players. When the infobox switching process is complete (a while from now), the NFLactive template will probably be renamed. The NFLactive template can also support AFL players with the afldraftyear, afldraftround, afldraftpick, aflstatseason, etc. fields. You can view them at Template:Infobox NFLactive, if you'd like. Furthermore, I don't really like the idea of infoboxes of retired players that have the colors of the team he was known for. This can easily be disputed. James "Shack" Harris is currently an executive for the Detroit Lions, which is why the infobox was colored that way before. The infobox currently does not even show his career as an executive. The NFLactive infobox can support coaches/executives as well. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, and his number should not have been added. There is a WikiProject for American football that you may be interested in. It is the parent project to WP:NFL and WP:CFB. There is also a project for the American Football League, but it is currently inactive. Canadian football is also considered professional football, and they have completely different infoboxes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Archie Roberts (American Football League)

The article Archie Roberts (American Football League) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've nominated Category:American Football League first round signees for deletion. Feel free to comment. Thanks--TM 21:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:American Football League quarterbacks

Category:American Football League quarterbacks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox merged sports league

Template:Infobox merged sports league has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Pro Football player coach

Template:Infobox Pro Football player coach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Y. Coniglio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angela Y. Coniglio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Oilers50thLogo600w.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oilers50thLogo600w.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 12:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Patriots50thLogo600w.png

Thanks for uploading File:Patriots50thLogo600w.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walt Fitzgerald

The article Walt Fitzgerald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject appears to fail WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:1965WrayCarlton.png

Thank you for uploading File:1965WrayCarlton.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 17:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Whit Canale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Valley of the Temples and Syracuse

Sicily (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Siracusa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Legas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mineola, Carducci, Pavese and Risi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gaetano Cipolla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to St. John's University and Tasso

Tascu (cap) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Coppola

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ten-year AFL patch.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ten-year AFL patch.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:AFL 10-year patch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:AFL 10-year patch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, SugnuSicilianu. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Lady of the Wheel

The article The Lady of the Wheel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for sources doesn't bring up anything that shows that this book passes WP:NBOOK. I've only found one source that might be usable as a RS, but we need multiple independent and reliable sources to show notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Sid Gillman Coaching Tree.

Hi there. Just so you know, sir, John Harbaugh won a Super Bowl. It's time to respectfully make a note of this on the Sid Gillman coaching tree. Thank you for your cooperation. Hope to hear from you soon. Mr. Brain (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sid Gillman coaching tree nominated for deletion

Since you are the creator of Category:Sid Gillman coaching tree, I am letting you know that its CfD can be found at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 February 7#Category:Paul Brown coaching tree. Thanks. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Yates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring Branch, Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camille Cusumano

The article Camille Cusumano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giacomo Cusmano, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Church of San Marco, Santa Caterina and Valguarnera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nation vs State

The word “Italian” points out the nationality and not the state he comes from. There is a huge difference. Cicero and Julius Caesar were not Italians because the Italian nation was formed after the fall of the Roman Empire as well as other European nations (German, French, English …). Napoleon's "Kingdom of Italy" was just a “puppet state”. Kingdom of Sicily and Kingdom of Two Sicilies were states and not nations. Now let me tell you what are the main and necessary features for forming a nation:

1)Language. Since 1000 AD all Italy (Sicily included) was characterized by several attempts of linguistic unification. This started in Sicily, with the Sicilian school, today considered the second most influential literary school for the Italian language. Dante Alighieri and his Dolce Stil Novo were influenced by the Sicilian school when he wrote what today is the first example of modern Italian. Since Dante Alighieri, the Italian language spreads to the Italian peninsula, and Sicily, thanks to the work of Pietro Bembo, a writer from Venice, who codified the Italian language for the first time. The Italian language began to be spoken by the upper class and artists in Italy since 1500/1600 AD. Since 1700 also the middle class was able to speak a basic level of Italian. Vincenzo Bellini spoke in Italian and wrote in Italian. Obviously, Latin was still used as well. Before the Italian Unification, all Italian states had Italian as official language along with Latin. Italian and Latin were spoken only by the literate people who were less than 15% of population after the Italian unification. The masses spoke only the regional languages (Sicilian, Venetian, Lombard …) until the institution of the compulsory school and in particular until 1950, when the introduction of the national TV allowed all to learn Italian.

2)Culture. This is another important feature. Since the middle ages Italy was characterized by the same artistic and literary movements. All Italian artists used to learn the same artistic culture. Filippo Juvarra an important Italian sculptor from Sicily had the same style and background of his Northern colleagues. This was because even though Italy was divided by foreign dominations, all the people born there received the same background in terms of culture and language (Latin and Italian). If you read the main works of the Italian writers are all written in Italian since the middle ages: the most important works of Verga and Pirandello are written in Italian. An implicit sign is in the 1820 Sicilian Constitution: even though Sicily proclaimed itself independent, politicians wrote the constitution in Italian and declared Italian as the only official language in Sicily. The same occurred in the 1848 Sicilian Revolution, when all the official documents were written in Italian. The cuisine is another cultural aspect of the Italian nation: all the recipes from Aosta to Lampedusa use ingredients from throughout Italy. Other aspects like the love for own city and family as well as for dressing well are all features that you find only in Italy, if you go even few miles outside (Switzerland, Slovenia, Croatia, France, Austria) you will find none of these features.

3)Claims of being nation. This is the base for recognizing a nation. People who claimed for Italian unification are everywhere. From writers to politicians, from painters to sculptors, since the middle ages. Writers such as Machiavelli and Petrarch (Tuscany), Settembrini and de Sanctis (Naples), Alfieri (Turin), Foscolo (Venice), Manzoni (Milan), Verga (Sicily) … they all have at least a work linked to the Italian nationalism.

These three features are all necessary. For instance only a language doesn't make a nation or only claims doesn't make a nation as well. The reason why Italy, France, Germany ... are also known as Nation states is because they are "states" based on "nations".

I am from Sicily and I understand why Americans with Sicilian ancestry have these ideas about Italy. People who emigrated from Sicily were in general illiterate, so the only language they were able to speak was a dialect of the Sicilian language (they were not able to speak the real Sicilian language). Probably you can consider it like a clear sign that Sicily was a nation with its own language but in fact it wasn’t. This aspect was due to the fact that the masses were illiterate and the only language they knew came from their own city or village. They didn’t know what was a nation and probably they didn’t know Sicily as well. They only knew their own city, that was their world. Politicians and the upper class (and sometimes the middle classes) had the key to rule Sicily (like in all European states) and those people had a cultural background and were aware of the Italian nation. You can tell me “but some works of Pirandello and Verga are written in Sicilian” … of course they are, but the concept of “nation” (as I told you) comes from a mix of several factors. They wrote also in Sicilian in order to represent the masses and the real life of the people from Sicily who were in large part illiterate in that period.

I hope I was clear enough. Greetings.--Ryusc (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the lesson

To paraphrase Adolph Hitler (Big Lie): "Tell a big lie often enough and loudly enough, and people will believe that it is true." Now, all we have to do is figure out is who's lying, you or me.

Roger II

Author and critic Anthony Di Renzo writes: <<Roger II, Sicily’s greatest king, died 860 years ago on February 26. The nephew of Robert Guiscard and son of Count Roger I, Roger II came to the throne at the age of nine and wrested control from his regent when he was sixteen. Crushing all opposition, Roger ruled Sicily until his death at the age of fifty-eight. Contemporaries claimed that he accomplished more in his sleep than other people did when awake.

Raised by Greek and Muslim tutors and secretaries in an island populated by Arabs and Greeks, Roger was more sophisticated than his hard-bitten, rough-and-ready Norman ancestors, most of whom were illiterate. Through shrewd diplomacy and sheer audacity, he outmaneuvered his lunkish Hauteville cousins and annexed Apulia and Calabria. He still lacked a royal title so when Innocent II and Anacletus II squabbled over the papacy, Roger supported the latter in return for a coronation on Christmas Day, 1130 in Palermo Cathedral. When Anacletus died, Roger defeated Innocent’s army the following year, took Innocent prisoner, and forced the pope to confirm his position as King of Sicily and overlord of Southern Italy. In a mosaic in Martorana Church Roger had himself depicted like a Byzantine emperor, being crowned by Christ.

Roger built and beautified churches, most notably the Cathedral of Cefalù, but most of his subjects were Muslims and Jews, who adored him. Much to the Rome’s dismay, Roger was a paragon of religious tolerance. His scarlet and gold-embroidered mantle was inscribed in Arabic and dated according to the Islamic calendar. His kitchen was staffed with Sephardic chefs, who kept the Christian king kosher. He flirted with Greek Orthodoxy, whether out of piety or spite. To project divine munificence, Roger kept an ostentatious court. Behind the scenes, however, he counted every penny to create an efficient civil service and a powerful navy. His fleet captured every North African port between Tunis and Tripoli, seized Malta and Corfu, harried the coasts of Greece, and abducted numerous Theban workers to staff Palermo’s silk factory. The king steered clear of crusading, but his ships sailed up the Bosphorus and impertinently fired arrows into the Byzantine Emperor’s garden.

Roger, however, valued peace more than war. Known for his intellectual curiosity and his regard for learning, he presided over Europe’s most glittering court among scholars from both the West and the Arab world. He discussed everything under the sun with philosophers and mathematicians, doctors and geographers, in French or Latin, Arabic or Greek, and he appointed a commission to collect, sift, and assemble all available knowledge about the physical world. After fifteen years, the commission produced “The Book of Roger,” which John Julius Norwich rightly calls “the greatest geographical work of the Middle Ages.”

“The earth,” it begins, “is round like a sphere.” And for forty years Roger made Sicily its center. When he finally died of overwork, he was buried in Palermo Cathedral in a porphyry tomb fit more for an emperor than a king, dressed in Byzantine royal robes and crowned with a tiara hung with pearl pendants. His third and last wife bore him a posthumous daughter Constance, who married Emperor Henry VI. Roger’s grandson Frederick II (called “Stupor Mundi,” the Astonishment of the World) would rule the Holy Roman Empire from Sicily. Many historians consider his reign the beginning of the Renaissance.>>

Wikipedia refers to Roger as "Roger II of Sicily". Wasn't he Italian? SugnuSicilianu (talk) 21:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AFL officials colorful uniforms

List of American Football League officials — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.116.191.43 (talk) 20:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC) this is more of an fyi, both the NFL and AAFC had used red/orange stripes the NFL also used green stripes for their game officials in the 1940s, so I guess the AFL "stole" this idea from the NFL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.116.191.43 (talk) 20:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jerry Sullivan (Sports writer)

The article Jerry Sullivan (Sports writer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Gaughan

The article Mark Gaughan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Legas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Legas Publishing Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Legas Publishing Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox AFLChamp

Template:Infobox AFLChamp has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox ArenaBowl. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Alakzi (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1967 American Football League draft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1967 American Football League draft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1967 American Football League draft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — DeeJayK (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1968 American Football League draft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1968 American Football League draft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1968 American Football League draft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — DeeJayK (talk) 20:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BuffaloBillsHelmetDecal1962through1973.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BuffaloBillsHelmetDecal1962through1973.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 20:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SugnuSicilianu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Buffalo Bills Hall of Famers

Template:Buffalo Bills Hall of Famers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. RoyalsLife 22:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SugnuSicilianu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of the Foolish Club has been nominated for merging

Category:Members of the Foolish Club has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 13:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Weiffenbach

The article Elizabeth Weiffenbach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Only reference is a school yearbook. Seems to only exist to link to former students.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 00:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth Weiffenbach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Weiffenbach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Weiffenbach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sean McDermott

Hello! I am wondering if you could add Sean McDermott to your image on the Sid Gillman coaching tree under Andy Reid. I know that you are well aware of the success of Coach McDermott and he definitely belongs in that tree. Thanks and GO BILLS! Monsieurdl ^{mon talk} 23:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Full Color Football: The History of the American Football League

The article Full Color Football: The History of the American Football League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Found only passing mentions at best.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boston Patriots Hall of Famers

Template:Boston Patriots Hall of Famers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Last Cannoli

The article The Last Cannoli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NBOOK criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]