User talk:Submarinor

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Submarinor, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! TOW talk 17:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for inappropriate reasons is not allowed. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Submarinor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am Laurel Howarth the wife of R. Williams, why are you blocking me? Laurel Howarth 19:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:40, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I told you why on Uboater's talk page, and I will repeat it here...

"I have blocked the Submarinor account - Getting someone else to register to try to do what you are blocked from doing amounts to block evasion. You have been told what to do if you wish to be unblocked - see WP:BASC for details of how to appeal the block. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As for "a dispute with some of the editors", you know it is rather more than that - it was repeated nasty attacks and threats issued against both individual editors and against Wikipedia (including attacks and vandalism on my Talk page even as recently as today - with this). You have been told you will not get your way by bullying and threatening people. If you want to act like a civilized person in civilized company, then follow the instructions you have been given - that is the only possible way you might get back to editing your user page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I can not replace his page then thats fine. But I am trying to make my own page. PS please dont call me a sock puppet I find it ofensive. Laurel Howarth Laurel Howarth 20:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, if you explain what you wish to do here on Wikipedia other than just carrying out the wishes of a blocked user, a reviewing admin might agree to unblock you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And, "sockpuppet" is probably a lot less offensive than being called a "meatpuppet", which is possibly actually more accurate in this situation (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Boing! said Zebedee, You have asked me not to try and reistate Richards page and I will not. I have created a user page submarinor, (yes I know it's spelt wrong) and whish to use it.

Bwilkins, I find your term even more offensive and cannot bieleve that in this modern world that you could be so sexist and vulga. Us women do have a mind of our own you know, we actually get the right to vote over here in UK.

Laurel Howarth 20:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

There's nothing sexist about the term "meatpuppet" - it refers to one person editing on behalf of another, regardless of gender. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC

Furthermore, your post quoted above at Boing! said Zebedee is a post which some people might see as unladylike, and for which personally would have seriously considered imposing a block had you not been blocked already.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(I'd assumed that was actually UBoater himself - but it's hard to tell who's who in all of this -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Who rattled your cage?

I am not trying to edit for somone else I just want to use the user page that I have created, without the complication of messing and appealing. I have done nothing wrong up to now, but you have both insulted and abused me. It is no wonder that Richard lost his rag with you. Now for the last time, please alow me to edit my page. Laurel Howarth 20:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a Social Network where people simply get to edit "their" pages - user pages are only there to support work done on building the encyclopedia, and you have shown no evidence of any intention to do that. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to make a convincing case that it will be of benefit to the project for you to be editing here - and I'd suggest a change of attitude would be a key part of that. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's it Done and dusted, You are both a pair egosatistical mailshovenist bigots, No wonder Richard lost his Rag, I have tried to work within your rules, you now insult the woman again by refairing me to facebook. In future now, just like him I shall now enter through the back door with multipal adresses and IP's Laurel Howarth 21:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has now been revoked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]