User talk:Starbuck-2/Archives/2007/January
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Starbuck-2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiProject Vancouver
This is an important message being sent out too all participants. We are currently recalling our list of participants. Any one who is inactive in the project will be moved to the "inactive" list respectively. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Vancouver#ROLL_CALL_-_All_Read|the project talk page for more details]] -- Selmo (talk) 20:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on 1990s CTV prime time schedules, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve (Slf67) talk 03:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Primetime schedules
I've seen a few of these similar TV schedules deleted at AfD, for having too much trivial, non-encyclopaedic information. Wikipedia is not for indiscriminate lists of information. It's your call but I'm pretty sure it will get deleted sooner or later. I'd hate to see you waste your time. --Steve (Slf67) talk 03:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)