User talk:Sprmw7

Welcome!

Hello, Sprmw7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 07:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Why are you adding carriage returns to these articles? If you want to help I can give you some pointers but that isn't really helping. --John (talk) 07:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LogicalDOC (software)

A tag has been placed on LogicalDOC (software) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Boing! said Zebedee 07:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete CSD

Hi. If you wish to contest the speedy deletion of your LogicalDOC (software) article, you should add a {{hangon}} as you did, but you should not remove the speedy deletion template. -- Boing! said Zebedee 08:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page LogicalDOC (software) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://documentalqueridowatson.blogspot.com/2009/10/eleccion-de-un-gestor-documental-maarch.html (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of LogicalDOC (software)

I have nominated LogicalDOC (software), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogicalDOC (software). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Haakon (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LogicalDOC software

A tag has been placed on LogicalDOC software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Haakon (talk) 14:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LogicalDOC sw

A tag has been placed on LogicalDOC sw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of LogicalDOC sw

Hello Sprmw7, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, LogicalDOC sw, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Haakon. This has been done because the page is an almost identical copy of a page deleted via a deletion discussion (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Haakon. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Haakon (talk · contribs) 06:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logicaldoc_logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Logicaldoc_logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Logicaldoc.png

Thank you for uploading File:Logicaldoc.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Logicaldoc screenshot.png

Thank you for uploading File:Logicaldoc screenshot.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of LogicalDOC SW

I have nominated LogicalDOC SW, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogicalDOC SW. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Haakon (talk) 07:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LogicalDOC SW

A tag has been placed on LogicalDOC SW, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Introducing Document Management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Introducing Document Management. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Document management system. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Document management system - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Borkificator (talk) 19:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Borkificator (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LogicalDOC

No, I will not remove the protected status from the page. If you really want to start it over again, given the many times variations on the same article have been deleted in the past, my recommendation would be to create it on a subpage of your user page -- User:Sprmw7/LogicalDOC -- and if it is found acceptable an admin can move it to article space. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, many thank for your advice, i just wanted a way to submit to Wikipedia this content because it is objectively no advertising but it is an article related to a notable thing. So many thanks, i will do what you suggested.

I've replied to your statement on the talk page of your draft article here. Minima © (talk) 08:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks talk

I've added some comments about your draft at User talk:Sprmw7/LogicalDOC. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LogicalDOC draft

I've made a number of mostly stylistic revisions to the draft article at User:Sprmw7/LogicalDOC. Most were stylistic stuff and wikilinking of non-obvious terms; I did make some substantive changes that I thought helped with neutrality. I'd ask you to review them to make certain that they don't hurt the accuracy of the article.

If they're OK, let me know, and I will unprotect the page and move the draft to article space. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LogicalDOC

The draft article we've been discussing should now appear at LogicalDOC. I have (I think) removed all editing protection from the article as well. (The interface is none too clear as to what happens when you move an unprotected page to a protected title. If it is still showing up as uneditable I'm sure you'll let me know.)

You might want to fix the broken links, that apparently went to screen shots. If there's anything further I can do let me know. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ldoc screenshot.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Ldoc screenshot.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ldoc logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ldoc logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah many thanks SineBot, i didn't know it, so thanks for the advice. Sprmw7 (talk) 05:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, SineBot won't respond. It is an automated bot that helps fix signatures on talk pages so everyone knows who said what. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]