User talk:SpeedyHaste2

December 2024

Hello, SpeedyHaste2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as SpeedyHaste (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a friend of the user speedyhaste SpeedyHaste2 (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you may then want to request to be renamed to prevent the two of you from being confused for the other. Wikipedia's username policy has more information, and I'm happy to answer any questions you have. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how can I rename myself SpeedyHaste2 (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a request SpeedyHaste2 (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Albanian atdhetar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albanian atdhetar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cmon why cant i just make wikipedia pages , i wont fo anything bad i swear SpeedyHaste2 (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And if u block me please dont delete the page SpeedyHaste2 (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpeedyHaste2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to make it clear that my intentions are positive, and I am not looking to cause harm or disrupt anything. My primary goal is to contribute to Wikipedia, expand its content, and make it more comprehensive for those who rely on it for information. I understand that in the past, I may have made some poor decisions or said things that were inappropriate, but I have taken the time to reflect on my actions and have learned from that experience. I have grown since that 'incident' where I expressed some harmful or negative views, and I am committed to making constructive and respectful contributions from here on out.

The incident happened three months ago, and since then, I’ve worked hard to change my behavior. I have focused only on creating positive, well-researched pages, yet my account was banned despite my efforts. I’ve made sure that my contributions were aligned with Wikipedia's standards, but many of the pages I worked on were deleted, which has been very frustrating. It feels like I haven’t been given a fair chance to show that I’ve changed and am fully committed to contributing positively.I believe that by helping to expand Wikipedia with accurate, well-researched information, I can contribute positively to the community and assist others in learning and discovering valuable knowledge. I understand that Wikipedia has its rules and standards, but I truly believe my contributions align with those guidelines. I hope that my account can be reinstated so I can continue contributing in a constructive way. I genuinely appreciate the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to making positive changes and to be given a chance to prove that I can be a valuable member of the Wikipedia community.

Decline reason:

We don't consider chatbot-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:58, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SpeedyHaste2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for the problems that I've caused over the past 3 months, yet since that incident I haven't done anything similar and only made some Wikipedia pages which got all deleted exept the Battle of Baballoq for some reason.

Now I apologize that I used AI to make a text as I was busy with other stuff and I couldn't write my own text. I have learned from that incident to just give up when a administrator wants to change something even though the sources are seen.

If you do not accept this request please unban the user User:SpeedyHaste as thats not a suck puppet of mine but a friend who got angry that he got banned because of me.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I'm sorry for the problems that I've caused over the past 3 months, yet since that incident I haven't done anything similar and only made some Wikipedia pages which got all deleted exept the [[Battle of Baballoq]] for some reason.
Now I apologize that I used AI to make a text as I was busy with other stuff and I couldn't write my own text.
I have learned from that incident to just give up when a administrator wants to change something even though the sources are seen.
If you do not accept this request please unban the user [[User:SpeedyHaste]] as thats not a suck puppet of mine but a friend who got angry that he got banned because of me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I'm sorry for the problems that I've caused over the past 3 months, yet since that incident I haven't done anything similar and only made some Wikipedia pages which got all deleted exept the [[Battle of Baballoq]] for some reason.
Now I apologize that I used AI to make a text as I was busy with other stuff and I couldn't write my own text.
I have learned from that incident to just give up when a administrator wants to change something even though the sources are seen.
If you do not accept this request please unban the user [[User:SpeedyHaste]] as thats not a suck puppet of mine but a friend who got angry that he got banned because of me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I'm sorry for the problems that I've caused over the past 3 months, yet since that incident I haven't done anything similar and only made some Wikipedia pages which got all deleted exept the [[Battle of Baballoq]] for some reason.
Now I apologize that I used AI to make a text as I was busy with other stuff and I couldn't write my own text.
I have learned from that incident to just give up when a administrator wants to change something even though the sources are seen.
If you do not accept this request please unban the user [[User:SpeedyHaste]] as thats not a suck puppet of mine but a friend who got angry that he got banned because of me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

User:SpeedyHaste2, please do not remove (or modify) your declined unblock requests again while you are still blocked. See WP:BLANKING.~SG 5536 B 11:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]