User talk:SpaceHist65

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Landsat program into NASA. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa, thank you for pointing this out. No issue complying (I see you already made attribution reference for Landsat). I will correct others if I think in a similar state. I also see your extensive history. Seeking some advice. A number of subsections (individual programs/missions) exist or existed as excerpts... Many of the excerpts (e.g. source intro paragraphs) lacked citations. I have used some language from source page (excerpt) but have added citations and altered in many. Does this generate the same attribution requirement? Or does the change to include the citation(s) change the obligation. not suggesting an issue with Landsat; but many other pages in the Spaceflight domain (e.g. NASA programs/missions) tend to lack citations.. Maybe another way to say this - does the attribution obligation require that the source already meet the wikipedia citation expectation? Appreciate any advice you may have on this.SpaceHist65 (talk) 23:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution has nothing to do with the citations; what you are doing when you provide attribution is giving credit to the authors - the Wikipedians who wrote the prose that you copied. This is required by the terms of our Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License. — Diannaa (talk) 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 NASA edits

Hello SpaceHist65, the NASA edits from this month were reverted primarily because there appeared to be rapid removals of content that weren’t adequately explained, and were also contested by another editor. We can meet at the article talk page to discuss further. Thanks. NeutraI (talk) 04:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There were very few practical removals of information. There was movement of historial spacecraft programs to the History section from the jumbled up prior narrative and creation of current programs to align with a previous structural change that I had made to fix the structural template issue that had been applied to the article. (note Planetary Sciences, Astrophysics, Earth Science additions). I am still working on Heliophysics missions. In the last week, I will admit to updating individual paragraphs that I had incorporated in the prior couple of weeks to ensure the use of original narrative instead of excerpts and also add additional spacecraft missions relevant to each topic area. This was in response to constructive comments by editor Diannaa regarding re-use of existing wikipedia material. You will not see any vandalism or other changes that are inconsistent with the reality of what NASA is doing. SpaceHist65 (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SoCal

Hello! I see you're in Southern California as am I. Whereabouts? I'm in Vista.

I'd planned to get a lot more Wikipedia written this winter, but so far, I've just managed two articles. :( --Neopeius (talk) 05:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South Bay Los Angeles (Torrance area).SpaceHist65 (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SpaceHist65! Your additions to Vladimir Lyakhov have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I formatted your edit request

Hi! I'm just letting you know that I reformatted the headings in your edit request at Talk:Parsons_Corporation. When you request an edit and then include text formatted as a top-level heading in the proposal, that is interpreted as a new section on the talk page. This can make requests difficult to read and also messes with some technical stuff, e.g. the edit request tool used by some editors to answer requests and automated talk page section archiving carried out by bots. For clarity and to avoid these issues, I have reformatted the request. Happy editing! Actualcpscm (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]