User talk:Sonisona

Let's assume good faith

Look, I am not doing this because I get some pleasure out of doing this. There are various reasons why I am doing this:

Wikipedia is an organic website and what people write about something in an article needs to be discussed first before further changes are made on the subject. You did not discuss any of the changes you made. You just deleted the whole article.
The controversies section was one that held the most importance, relevance and factual content to it and you removed it as well. Many administrators on the Wikipedia are starting to dislike this move and some have taken notice of the deliberate spamming.
I am a Pakistani and I care as much about the pageant's success and appreciation as any progressive Pakistani would. Believe me, criticism helps and highlighting criticism and controversies make the content of the article suitable for it to consideration by the Wikipedia administrators for things like Wikipedia's Did You Know? section.
Last but not the least, as I said earlier I can help you. I am not Nadia Khan, if you get what I mean!

Thanks for taking time to read this, Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 07:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understandable. Please put all your critisism under Controversies section. It helps the people know as well.

Secondly, do not call it unofficial because the government has not done any such statement yet. When it legally announces please go ahead and do so.

Please as I said the article was the truth and is not hearsay, so add as much controversy you want to add BUT it should be done under the rigth heading... only because the whole history of the pageant was hidden and therefore the only thing you did was highlight the controversy. This pageant is about a lot of things plus the controversy, but everything has a heading.

thanks. Unsigned comment by Sonisona (talk)

I couldn't agree more but please read the talks on the article's talk page as well. I have addressed more concerns there. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 22:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop taking my name when I haven't done anything

Note that the changes that have been happening on the article have been made by other users with separate accounts. Some in this instance bothered by the same thing I am bothered with and that is the subject's dealing with authenticity. I believe it is what the website says but when it comes to encyclopaedias, things need to be written with neutrality. You can check these changes by clicking on the "history" button on the top of the article page.

The way you write it is like saying, "Colgate makes teeth whiter" and "Close-up makes teeth whiter" where if one of them is written, then we are stuck with a false positive stating the other is wrong. You suggest that the admissions have increased stating "15% increase since 2006, and a 412% increase since the pageant's formation" where there is no source provided, hence the term is stated a false positive. See section improvement discussion on the Miss Pakistan page for more help. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 01:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sure... you can delete the %centage as welll

The pecentage part you can delete... but now that I see the article... almost everythign is questioned... Its a bit amazing why though .... anyways... you can question and delete the percentage,.. as I dont agree with the numbers... but if there is citation required.. i can attach some youtube videos... so how do we do that then when its not allowed.... --Sonisona (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, for Pakistani articles, we have workgroups that work for the maximum quality of articles. We work for Pakistani articles to highlight their importance. If you go to the article's talk page, you will see their Importance in the banner at the top. Only registered Pakistani Wikipedians who belong to the workgroup are to modify that.

Secondly, we only look for articles that have notability to some degree and make them notable by citing. Wikipedia is strict with rules and we have to be to. If this article remained uncited for just a bit more, it would have had been deleted. I apologise if I used harsh measures for you to take notice but this is not an easy task. Anyway, I hope that the article remains progressing towards a better, much more informative version of itself. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 05:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I forgot to tell you. Once you have added all the references for the article, they would be submitted for a third-party consideration to check for validation. Like I said there are some links that are not acceptable. By the way, I found a website called VidPK or ChaltaTV which you can reference on Wikipedia as it is not YouTube, i.e., if you can find your videos there or if there is a way you can upload your videos there. Plus these websites are more famous with Pakistanis. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 05:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sinebot

thanks for letting me know about the signation.. i am learning everything about wikipedia as we talk.. --Sonisona (talk) 04:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is well written

This article is well return... as I dont think that every section of this article needs to have a controversy. I think this is a huge part played by ARUN to actually show this article as much controversial as possible. The pageant is not supposed to be just for controversy.

The main objectives of the company are not written or highlighted. A handful of Pakistanis like ARUN have a certain agenda to follow, to defame once again. The headline for Controvery is well written but ofcourse needs clean up. Unfortunately... whether the article is deleted or not.... there will be a good number of people who will keep on making the right corrections and bringing the article up to date as it is now.

Also this note is for all Wikipedia users. The Controversy section should have the controversy lined. Anything related to ballant advertizing can be removed. But so much negativity all over the article is not acceptable. The pageant has done far more, and the sites are included in the Reference part.

The reason people are now saying that this is advertising is because all they want to highlight is the negativity.

But what I fail to understand is that entire format was disturbed in this article.... the pictures were deleted... etc... The article looked pretty but all the time bold and highlighted quotes were added. Why are teh quotes highlighted in larger and bolder text. The reason behind this is again to show only the controversial part of this pageant.

Please check Miss World as well as Miss Earth. So much controversy is there with Miss Earth when it had the first Miss Afghanistan in a bikini plus Miss World where in Nigeria so many people died as well as when Miss World happned in india... yet the controversies are not highlighted.

As I said ARun this article can be deleted, it is better that way rather than do what you are good at trying to have a personal agenda to defame a pageant... Where have you highlighted what pageants they did.. do u know how many titles they have won... and what charities they go.. No, ARUN you have not done any of your research,.

Well then let the best person win.... I dontthink your highlighting that this article is to be deleted.. makes any difference... also what do you think that our hands are tired... we will still write articles that make sense according to the wikipedia standards like we contributed before, also the material is saved and no matter if the article is deleted.... there will be contributors like me and a hundred more...who will bring out the things the pageant has done.

And why do you think that only a person working for the company can write these articles... i never assumed that you were Nadia Khan.... so why do u assume it. I did find out that Daniel sdid contriute articles but does not work for them any more....

So I dont know where you get your facts from.... but learn how to write a neutral article... you were not there for racist comments... see if the news is credible... like that any and every lollywood or bollywood star's bio would be 10 pages long...

--Sonisona (talk) 21:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly refrain from attacking me with accusations while being unaware of who's doing what. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 22:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No one is attacking but the facts speak for it self

Time and time again you have deleted teh entire body of the article... you have made controversies bolder and bigger in text... I did check other articles of pageants and no one have such formats liket eh one youhave created.

not only that, you have only added to the controversy and then each and every paragraph of the pageant had only the controversy added to it.

Miss World - nigeria hundreds died in christian muslim riots... pageant had to move to Uk, Amitabh Bachan became bankrupt after he held Miss World in India as for the protests...

Miss Earth - first Miss Afghanistan who got a Fatwah (death penalty ) from the religious leaders..

All this has happened... yet no one has ever written all that under those Wikipedia sites...

If you are such a great contributor.. then why not correct everythign...

The bottom line seems that you have a hidden agenda... as I said, I rather see this artivcle deleted then people like you write only what youhave heard from a not so credible channel... that too on a talk show which is not the authentic news of GEO TV. GEO TV did never report it as a news.. it was a talk show, like JAY LENO SHOW or DAVID LETTERMAN SHOW. So if these people make a comment... about someone will that be taken as NEWS or credible...

You have taken this to extremes... and therefore done it to only defame this pageant...

All your citations are 100 years old... Please check before you write.. you have written about neelam noorani when she was an independent lady who went from karachi you have quoted 4-5 year old government people.... also please keep inmind if there is a opposition party who is not happy with the President's enlightenment.. they will definitly give their comments...

What comments can be taken seriously and wha tcannot should be thoguht of before they are written.. We cannot write 10 pages of only controversy.. obviously.. there is more to the event than just one Nadia Khan and one Hafeez ur Rahman..

If you thought properly then they have covered 7 years....so there must be soemthing the company did in 7 years...

i am bit disappointed with people like ARUN who are not writing a neutral article... --Sonisona (talk) 07:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I already mentioned, please refrain from attacking me with allegations. I would kindly request you to be calm about this issue because the things mentioned above, I never did them. Let us start talking about the things you just mentioned, just to prove that you were wrong:

You said, "Time and time again you have deleted teh entire body of the article... you have made controversies bolder and bigger in text... I did check other articles of pageants and no one have such formats liket eh one youhave created."
Now, first of all, I never deleted your article over and over again only enhanced the article. First edit I made was to remove the name in Hindi and provided an edit summary for it (unlike you). Then, I let the pageant history be as it is and changed only the criticism section. Because, the article was written like an advertisement, I added a notice on top. Finally I removed all the uncited stuff from the controversies section and added an image of Mahleej.
It was after these edits, that I came to the "History section". There I only copy-edited stuff which means to provide references and correct the English grammar mistakes people had made before me.
A user named SkyWalker removed the mention of your official blog. Again it wasn't me.
Then a person using an IP address 77.199.114.57, added a section named "Standard" or "Pageant Image". This section was highly negative. This can NOT be me, as the editor was from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania suggested by the GeoLocate, a tool that lets you know the location of an IP address. I am in the UK on the other hand, miles apart.
This American was really mad with you guys and changed a lot of good information into negative information, check this. Again it wasn't me.
If you look carefully these links I gave you, I never made a negative comment about you. It was someone else from America who has a thing against you. HE ADDED THE SECTION FOR "RACIST COMMENTS" AS WELL. But, you just insist on blaming me as well.
I have told you a hundred times to check THE HISTORY to confirm. All changes made on Wikipedia are stored forever on Wikipedia. The history button is at the top of the article. You will know who did what if you could only CLICK IT ONCE.

I hope you refrain from attacking me like you do to all other people. Nobody has taken notice of your abuse now but people will take note and you and your company will be blocked from using Wikipedia. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 20:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

Hi, I notice that you contested the deletion of Miss Pakistan World on deletion review. However you have not provided any reason why the deletion should be overturned. This is just a note to say that if no reasoning is provided this will be have to be quickly closed as the person who puts something on deletion review must provide a reason for overturning a deletion. Davewild (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added my thoughts on the deletion review. Davewild (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wecome

Welcome!

Hello, Sonisona, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Pakistan World and Sonia Ahmed

Hi, Thanks for our message regarding these articles. My suggestion, as I said on the deletion review for Miss Pakistan World, is to create a user space version (e.g at User:Sonisona/Miss Pakistan World or User:Sonisona/Sonia Ahmed) using the Wikipedia:Amnesia test and paying particular attention to neutral point of view, you can then bring this userspace version back to deletion review where it can be reviewed to see if it is ok to be restored.

In order for them to be restored they will to cite significant coverage in reliable sources and not appear to be promotional. You are quite welcome to invite other editors to help you in creating/editing the userspace articles.

Hope this is helpful and good luck. Davewild (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I am saying is that, as I pointed to at the Wikipedia:Amnesia test, is to completely rewrite the article(s) using inline citations and only include material that can be sourced to reliable secondary sources (i.e. sources that have nothing to do with the subject of the article). I am afraid I know nothing about the topic so would not be the best person to help with the article but you may find someone at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan who would help. The version you have recreated at User:Sonisona/Miss Pakistan World has very few references which are what you will need in order to persuade people to allow the article to be recreated. Davewild (talk) 07:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a userfied version of the article at User:Sonisona/Sonia Ahmed with the last version of the article before the deletion per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Ahmed on June 19, 2008. Since it was deleted per a discussion and considering that a related article was deleted before then resurrected, it is preferred that if you want to relaunched the article, do the necessary improvements and expansions so that it meets the notability, verifiability and other guidelines - and then submitted it to deletion review or ask an admin to see if it can be resurrected. If not it might be included in the Miss Pakistan World (or other related) article. There is barely a brief mention of her, maybe some extra info can be added there if the Ahmed doesn't return. JForget 20:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as references goes, it has improved definitely with some coverage by the New York Times and the Toronto Star and multiple other international third-party references which would I guess pass that WP:N criteria - so it would be restored because of this. Also it is a good thing to wack most of the political bits in the text as part of it was not WP:NPOV. There is some clean-up to do though. Links pointing to sources can be cited using the <ref> and </ref> format as some of the references are already. Now not sure with the other news section, though maybe add more text from these articles to the text or maybe just change the name of the header to other references. JForget 22:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sana Mushtaq

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sana Mushtaq, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mrspakistanworld.com/mrspakistan09-sana.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sonisona! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 14 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sana Mushtaq - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sonisona. You have new messages at Mbinebri's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

February 2010

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 17:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danish Taimoor

The article Danish Taimoor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography. Please add sources before removing this tag. See Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for help on this.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 22:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Salma Ataullahjan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ravenswing 09:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sonisona. You have new messages at Active Banana's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Farjad0322^{(talk|sign|contribs)} 11:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mrs. United Nations International

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mrs. United Nations International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mrs. United Nations International

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mrs. United Nations International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to referencing

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nadeem, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Veena Malik, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your comment on my talk page. Syrthiss (talk) 14:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nyla Hasan for deletion

The article Nyla Hasan is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyla Hasan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gule Sheikh

The article Gule Sheikh has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attia Bano Qamar

Hi Sonisona, since you solely wrote the above mentioned person's profile, I hope you can help me with this claim. "Bano[14], also did a few music videos for local Norwegian vocalists and participated in local South Asian reality television shows in Norway", can you please mention any of the video or the "local South Asian reality television shows in Norway" which she participated in. I live in Oslo, Norway and find it difficult to accept these claims. Regards Mehmda (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Attia Bano Qamar

The article Attia Bano Qamar has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Grrahnbahr (talk) 11:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Attia Bano Qamar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attia Bano Qamar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attia Bano Qamar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Grrahnbahr (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saman Hasnain

Please stop editing this (and her husband's) artilce to indicate that she or her husband are guilty of anything. This contravenes WP:BLP as they have only been charged and must be presumed innocent under US law until found guilty in court. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 08:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220 of ^Borg 05:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot

* You added bare URLs (Uniform resource locators) as references in your recent edits to Bhoja Air Flight 213. Please avoid doing this. The lack of title, dates, publishers and author/s etc means that if the URL is moved (which is quite common) it is far harder to find the source again. There is a section above on this talkpage about formatting references, please take a look.- 220 of ^Borg 05:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you?

Are you the real Sonia Ahmed? If yes i have a question regarding the pageant! --Heyhello1234567 (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I took the name as those were the days I was writing about the pageant!!!--Sonisona 06:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shan Virk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oakville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Miss Canada Pakistan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ashwin.sri (talk) 16:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dolly Bindra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Sonisona 12:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lollywoodcafe.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lollywoodcafe.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Altered Walter (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused, how come its deleted and how come other web content sites are on wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood.com --Sonisona 06:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Meera (Irtiza Rubab), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 04:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought all was resolved... everything has a link to it. Infact I can add more links today and prove that the article is well cited. --Sonisona 06:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meera (Irtiza Rubab), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nazar and Kasak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sonisona. You have new messages at AdventurousSquirrel's talk page.
Message added 05:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saman Hasnain

Please stop removing sourced material and adding unsourced original research and POV.Your actions are beginning to constitute vandalism. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the article's talk page. Harry the Dog WOOF 01:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Rakshanda Khattak, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not remove maintenance tags without addressing the problem and -- as you have been warned before -- please do not add uncited blp material. Epeefleche (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey are you kidding me.... I was adding info to this site.. to make it much more reliable. You must be sick headed to think I am removing things. No body ever dared to care about this article... It was me, who are trying to give some life.. yo useriously must be out of your mind... go right ahead and do as you wish.. I was jsut helping... and there is no more need of maintenance tags,.. all was ompleted according to me! --Sonisona 03:23, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mrs. Pakistan World, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 02:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey are you kidding me.... I was adding info to this site.. to make it much more reliable. You must be sick headed to think I am removing things. No body ever dared to care about this article... It was me, who are trying to give some life.. yo useriously must be out of your mind... go right ahead and do as you wish.. I was jsut helping... and there is no more need of maintenance tags,.. all was ompleted according to me! --Sonisona 03:23, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:08, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for personal attacks at Talk:Saman Hasnain. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 03:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Harry the Dog WOOF 01:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to edit war at Saman Hasnain after the expiration of your previous block. Likewise, your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saman Hasnain indicates that your nomination was disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 01:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This block is also for apparent sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry; it is obvious that User:PKKAMALIA is you. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United Nations Pageants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Nations Pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations Pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 12:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sehr Mahmood

The article Sehr Mahmood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: a non notable pagent winner from 2006; no RS can be found. The micro-stub article has not been improved since tagged "Notability" in 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saiyma Haroon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saiyma Haroon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiyma Haroon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tahmena Bokhari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tahmena Bokhari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahmena Bokhari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 11:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farah Mahmood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farah Mahmood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farah Mahmood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annie Rupani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Rupani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Rupani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zanib Naveed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zanib Naveed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanib Naveed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayesha Gilani Taylor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayesha Gilani Taylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Gilani Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 07:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shan Virk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shan Virk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shan Virk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Attia Bano Qamar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attia Bano Qamar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attia Bano Qamar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sohail Rashid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sohail Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohail Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gule Sheikh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gule Sheikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gule Sheikh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 04:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Reference details go here

[1]