User talk:Solowalk

Welcome!

Hello, Solowalk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Alan Claude Ferguson, from its old location at User:Solowalk/sandbox/Alan Claude Ferguson. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope I am doing this correctly.I have a question on my page Alan Claude Ferguson. He was really know as Claude Ferguson .Most news articles and his Indiana University collection is under Claude. Most of his pages are located by tying in Claude Ferguson.

Any suggestion? Thank you!!

solowalkSolowalk (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC) — solowalk(Solowalk (talk) 18:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Solowalk, I have moved the article to Draft:Claude Ferguson as the common name. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Idea! Thank you solowalk(Solowalk (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claude Ferguson has been accepted

Claude Ferguson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Claude Ferguson

Thanks for creating Claude Ferguson.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The article needs more footnotes and some copyediting for tone and flow

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remarks about article

I'm glad to see that my Uncle Claude has an article concerning his contributions. I recently included a link on my father's to his article. If there is anything I can help with please let me know. Robertbruceferguson (talk) 22:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would be glad to help with page, having lived through all which this page reflects. Many of the anecdotes need sources and are attributed to A. Claude but were from other members of the family. Would you like me to get approval from someone whoever you are before I change? But, overall a good timeline. Yes, I have removed my name. Please, do not add back. ----Nowaytorunarailroad (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you had originally suggested the page be called A. Claude Ferguson. But, fraye, the sock puppet suggested you not. Yes, many newspapers and academic folks shortened his name due to space consideration, but he was always adamant about being called and cited as A. Claude. This is distressing and a harm to his legacy to have an inaccurate public page. His death certificate was also originally incorrect as just Claude Ferguson, and I went to extreme lengths to have it corrected to his birth certificate name. He was dedicated to genealogy, and history and his legacy. Please honor him with his correct name usage. Thank you. Nowaytorunarailroad (talk) 21:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC) Nowaytorunarailroad (talk)[reply]

June 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at WP:TH, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 00:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflcit of interest editing

Hello, Solowalk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Claude Ferguson, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your help. To comply with COI issues..how do I find someone to complete and clean up my mess?Solowalk (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Thanks for asking. I suggest placing {{help me}} on your talk page to ask for help. Masum Reza^📞 16:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solowalk. First of all, thanks for taking a look at the conflict-of-interest editing page I linked to above. The best thing to do in this case would be to follow WP:COIADVICE and WP:PSCOI#Steps for engagement (don't be confused by the link names, you'll find the information you'll need if you click on them). Basically, other than a minor change (like one listed in WP:MINOR), you should use the article talk page to make edit requests. There are other editors now working on trying to clean the article up and bring it more inline with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines; so, one of them is likely to see your request and respond. Just be a little patient and someone should get to your request as soon as they can. Try and understand though that bringing the article up to Wikipedia's standards might me actually removing unsourced or otherwise inappropriate content in some cases. If that happens it's because it's the best thing for the article and Wikipedia, not because it's an attempt to try and diminish anything your father accomplished. The ultimate goal is to make the article be a suitable for Wikipedia as possible, not Wikipedia as suitable as possible for the subject of the article. In the end, articles are written about subjects, not for subjects, in Wikipedia's voice and should only reflect content which can be verified through citations to reliable sources (preferably independent and secondary) written in a neutral tone.

Finally, I saw the post you left on Cullen328's user talk page where you referred to yourself as "Carla". You posted at the Teahouse that you were Ferguson's son. "Carla" is generally a female name (I apologize if it's not in this case), so I'm wondering if you might be Ferguson's daughter or another female relative instead of his son. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI, Marchjuly. I must have made another typo or forgot who I am.., I am his daughter...Carla... I was going to post the same to you as I did to Cullen..the two of you have been very understanding and helpful. I don't want to make anymore mistakes and I want to be compliant. I only want the truth out there...but I do have outside newspaper publications that state what I wrote. that is where I got alot on my info. I probably have 200 newspaper clippings. How do I get those to editors for their work on the site. Rosemary O'Learys book is probably the best source for his lawsuit, etc. The Ethics of dissent.

I am just fumbling through this. Thanks again!! Solowalk (talk) 22:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Solowalk: My bad for mistaking you as Ferguson's son. Not sure why I assumed you were male. My apologies for that. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, Carla said at the Teahouse that this person was her father. She did not say that she was his son. I do not have time right now to look at all of this in more detail. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:28, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for catching that Jim. I realized that myself after I made my post and was going to correct it when I got near a computer. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MarchjulyHey, Friends, I'm good with it all..thanks, CarlaSolowalk (talk) 01:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC) I would not have been surprised if I had said son.Solowalk (talk) 01:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}}Solowalk (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly Hi, Cite for lawsuit and off road vehicle articles are in publication and online at: Rosemary O’Leary Syracuse University

<ref>When a Career Public Servant Sues the Agency He Loves: Claude Ferguson, the Forest Service Oﬀ-Road Vehicles in the Hoosier National Forest<ref>. and the book, <ref>The Ethics of Dissent<ref>. In addition: DDT Aerial Spraying faulty original diagnosis, cortisone use and problems arising from it, DRs and hospital names are cite. in published 1977 newspaper article...<ref>"Ferguson still battling Bureaucracy but tired of waiting" by David Hulen IDS Staff Writer<ref> Indiana Daily Student, Bloomington, IN. This exists, I have the article. I need for someone to cite these for article since I cannot due to COI. Thanks much!Solowalk (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, if someone is willing to go to http://academic.udayton.edu/RichardGhere/POL%20318/O%27Leary_Rosemary.pdf the article I am trying to get cleaned up will be there I have a COI and cannot edit further. I appreciate any help and not judging me. Thank youSolowalk (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This request is a duplicate of the one at Talk:Claude Ferguson#Not neutral point of view. I have commented there; there's no need to ask for help with the same issue on two pages, and the article's talk page is the better venue to discuss the improvement of the article. Huon (talk) 23:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted is not lost

View history saves all edits (additions and subtractions), seen by clicking on prev for each edit. As suggested elsewhere, now that this article exists, changes you hope to see in the article are better suggested at the Talk page of the article. David notMD (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Solowalk! You created a thread called unable to make changes at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Solowalk! You created a thread called Need Editor Help : Claude Ferguson Article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff

Hi Solowalk. Since article talk pages are mainly for discussing ways to improve and article, I will respond to your last post at Talk:Claude Ferguson#O'Leary article in PAR here on your user talk page instead. A couple of things. First some general, and then some specific.

Nobody should judge you simply because you're a beginner. In fact, Wikipedia has a page titled Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers that is good guide as to how to the Wikipedia community wants its editors to deal with beginners. Wikipedia is a work in progress and mistakes are expected to be made, so don't worry about it when you do. Mistakes only become "problems" when they're repeated over and over again, particularly after the person making them has been advised not to do so. So, for the most part, you should really be judged only based upon whether your edits are in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If they are, then per WP:SILENCE nobody will undo them; if someone feels they aren't, then per WP:BRD they may get re-worked or undone completely. When the latter happens, it's nothing personal against either the person making the edit or the subject of the article. So, you don't need to keep requesting not to be judged every time you post something. Believe me, you will know for sure when you do something which is so wrong that you're being judge because others will clearly tell you so.
When people respond to something you post, they might simply get straight to the point without any beating around the bush. This doesn't mean they are being rude; it just means they are just try to keep things on point. It's perfectly OK to disagree with someone by citing relevant policies and guidelines, even in a strongly worded way; things only start to be come a problem when the focus shifts from commenting on content to commenting on other editors. There's are specific places for discussing editor behavior, but an article talk page is not really one of them.
All editors are WP:VOLUNTEERs which means they sometimes get WP:BUSY; even WP:ADMINISTATORS are volunteers. This means there's no 24/7 professional staff trying to keep things running smoothly. People from all over the world are editing for lots of different reasons; so, not everyone is going to be on the same schedule as you or have the same focus as you. The ultimate goal for an editor is to be WP:HERE and there are WP:NODEADLINES so to speak, which means that sometimes the responses you get may not be what you like or come as you like. So, you just need to be patient.
Article content is going to be determined by [[:WP:CON}}SENSUS based upon what's in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Sometimes, a consensus might turn out to be something different from what we may personally want, but that's how things work on a collaborative editing project like Wikipedia. If you want complete 100% control over content written about your dad, then perhaps things like Facebook, your own website, or even Wikia would be a better place for you to achieve that.
WP:PING notifications can be helpful, but they will only work when you add them to a post and then WP:SIGN the post. They won't work if you add them after the fact to something you've already posted and signed. In other words, once a post has been signed and "Publish changes" have been clicked, you can't go back and add a notification template to it. Actually, you can, but it won't work. Another thing about pinging, is that it's something you can easily overdo. Think of yourself standing at sign-in desk of a hotel. There's nobody there, so you tap the bell. After a minute or so there's still nobody there, so you tap the bell again. You wait some more, but still nobody has come; so, you start tapping the bell over and over and over again, until finally somebody appears. You might think nothing of it, but I'm pretty sure the hotel person is really ignored and most likely is not going to be in much of a mood to want to help you out. This is why many editors don't like to be pinged, and some have even turned off that feature so that they can't be pinged. Once again, all editors are volunteers which means they aren't required to respond whenever you ping them or even respond at all. Many editors watch certain pages and will see when they are edited or something new is posted; so, pinging might not be needed each and everytime. Sometimes, you just have to play it by feel.
All of the above also indirectly applies to edit requests. The harder a request is to figure out, the less likely you're going to be to get a quick response. Similarly, the more complicated and involved you make the request (like requesting a total re-write) of a large part of an article, the more time it's going to take for someone to respond. Simple is best when making an edit request, and you need to be patient when making them. Ideally, the best requests are ones that pretty much any editor without any specific knowledge of the subject matter, but with a good general knowledge of relevant Wikipedia policies should be able to answer. Anything more complicated or involved than that might be better off asked at a noticeboard like Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard or on the talk page of one of the WikiProjects which are often listed at the top of article talk pages. Those types of places are where you'll likely find editors with specific knowledge either about COI matters or particular subjects.

I will answer you question about the actual O'Leary source under your post about it on the article's talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]