User talk:Smith.edwin

Welcome

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Here You G Smith.edwin (talk) 23:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Italic text==Sockpuppetry case==

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Schuenemann.joshua for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Lhb1239 (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no I have been blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smith.edwin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I saw the compare logs for the sock. Puppetry case against me , and I saw no similarities between me and this User:Joshua Scheunemann. Can I get more information

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also my school ip needs to be unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Smith.edwin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

173.8.126.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: [[User:Scheunemann.joshua]]

Blocking administrator: MuZemike (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Absolutely not! You will just make more sockpuppets. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Smith.edwin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

but this is on the school network. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Nope, the IP block is working as intended -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smith.edwin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

but I swear it was another student at my school I got To DeLaSalle Hight School. And they must of been editing and vandalism on the Wikipedia . Therefore I want to be unblocked because I am not a sock puppet.

Decline reason:

You're really not fooling anyone - Talk page access of blatant sock revoked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are, by far, the worst impersonation of a college professor I have ever come across. As if it wasn't bloody obvious from this and this that you are the same person as Scheunemann.joshua, you then proceed to insert the same information he did to the Death of Caylee Anthony case as he did here (and not to mention edit-war to get it back in here, here, here, and here) and as User:Theantiadmin did here. There is also the egregious tagging of the article by him here; the same tagging you have done here and here, the same as Theantiadmin did here.

And no, we are not unblocking your school's IP; you have become responsible for blocking your entire school from editing Wikipedia, and we will not allow you to edit Wikipedia as long as you continue your deceit, rudeness, and disruption of articles. Besides, why would we unblock your school's IP when we all know you will just proceed to create another account, evade your block, and cause more disruption? –MuZemike 20:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]