User talk:Skgacharya

July 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not clear on what you asked. You added a heading "Objectivity and NPOV" which was a heading on the Help Desk archive I linked to, but that wasn't your question.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concept medical moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Concept medical, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cabayi (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Skgacharya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Parth Doshi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Parth Doshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.conceptmedicals.com/about-us/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 16:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sunil Acharya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sunil Acharya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://contentmarketinginstitute.com/2011/11/how-to-develop-a-wikipedia-page. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ravensfire (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concept Medical moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Concept Medical, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 16:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Skgacharya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Also, if you are being paid to edit any articles on Wikipedia, you must disclose that information. You can read what's needed on WP:PAID. Several of the articles you've contributed are pretty promotional in tone which is concerning. Ravensfire (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Page titles for persons do not have honorifics in them. Don't move Kiran C Patel back to Dr Kiran C Patel. Ravensfire (talk) 12:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nanolute Technology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nanolute Technology, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 12:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ravensfire, The page Nanolute Technology declined and moved to draft due to less content. I have improved the content and linked additional information. Kindly review it.

It's substantially unsourced and while reviewing the single linked source, I noticed that both images in the article are from there. Yet you uploaded them as "own work". So you either lied about it being own work and it's another copyright violation for you, or you are the author of the work (highly unlikely given your issues with English) and have an undeclared WP:COI around all of this. Regardless, the article is not close to ready for main space. Ravensfire (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nanolute Technology (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nanolute Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nanolute Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Skgacharya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Skgacharya. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Surat

Hello. Your recent edit to Surat appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arjayay, I have added Savji Dholakia he is a very famous and well-known person and the 2nd one is Manish Doshi is the Inventer of World's first sirolimus-coated balloon catheter and I'm creating a page for him. Skgacharya (talk) 13:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skgacharya - I didn't delete Savji Dholakia, because he already had an article, but deleted Manish Doshi, because, at the time, he did not.
However looking at Manish Doshi, which you have just moved from draft to article space, I suspect it will be deleted unless you can quickly add some reliable, independent, sources - Arjayay (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arjayay, what are the reliable, independent, sources? I'm new to Wikipedia I need some guide of experience wikipedian. I have added the Reference Links on the page. Skgacharya (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just reverted your edit on Savji Dholakia because you have copied info directly from Outlook article. Copying is copyright violation and is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia. Always write info in your own words and cite the reference. You can read about reliable sources at WP:RS. I will be happy to help if you have any query.-Nizil (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nizil, I have just linked his net worth as [er the new across the glow. If You don't believe then just google it you will get the same. Skgacharya (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manish Doshi taken to AFD, article is in horrible shape and this is REALLY starting to look like undeclared paid editing. Skgacharya, if you are being compensated to create all of these medical articles that you obviously don't know anything about yet can create amazing press release like articles, you need to read WP:PAID and you need to make the declarations. At a minimum, given your track record of poor quality articles, you should ONLY be creating draft articles and you should NEVER move them in the main article space. This may be something to raise at WP:COIN. Ravensfire (talk) 16:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manish Doshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manish Doshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Doshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ravensfire, I have moved the page to Draft: consider the article as a draft and don't delete from Wikipedia. I agree the content was copied from outlookbusiness.com but I'm not getting any paid for that. I have updated many pages since I'm in the medical field and noticed a new innovation so started to write about him. You can check my contribution if you don't belive and I really don't have any experience on wiki. My interest to become a Wikipedian by improving the content only. Let me know if you still have any issue.Skgacharya (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever you rewrite it, you can start by not copying from other people's work. Nearly all of what you added was directly lifted from articles, and some of them were press releases! Yourstory is a self-published website that shouldn't be reviewed at all as you cannot use it for anything on Wikipedia. You've got a long, long way to go on this article. Ravensfire (talk) 20:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Ravensfire, You make me understood that referencing an article is never mean to copy whole the content from the article. So you removed the extra content from the page. What about the "Template : Article for deletion/dated". Can you remove that or that will be there unless it's submitted or moved to the main article? I'll try myself to improve to write my own content. Many thanks for making me understood. Skgacharya (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And several other of your articles are lifted word for word from other peoples work. That's just lazy AND it's a copyright violation. You need to read the section below and the articles it links to CAREFULLY. You also need to read through reliable sources and identifying reliable sources as many of the sources you tried to use are junk. Hint - yourstory and anything that's a press release are bad sources. Since you are getting into medical claims, you also need to read WP:MEDRS. Stuff purely about the company generally doesn't need to meet that stricter standard, but if you mention anything about the benefits of a product, yes, MEDRS applies. A single favorable study does not meet MEDRS. Honestly, ALL of your articles need to be reviewed at this point for copyright violations. Ugh. Ravensfire (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Skgacharya, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Manish Doshi have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Surat into Surat district. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Manish Doshi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concept Medical (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Concept Medical and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Concept Medical, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Skgacharya! You created a thread called New Article Nenolute Technology at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your addition to Draft:Manish Doshi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This edit where you added a paragraph about his education was directly lifted from an external website. Again, that's copyright infringement. YOU CANNOT DO THAT HERE. You WILL end up blocked if you keep doing that. READ the links above that were given when this was spotted early. Seriously, don't do this again. Ravensfire (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Concept Medical has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Concept Medical. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concept Medical (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Concept Medical and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Concept Medical, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abluminus-DES

Hello, Skgacharya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abluminus-DES".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:South Gujarat Textile Traders Association

Hello, Skgacharya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South Gujarat Textile Traders Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fostta

Hello, Skgacharya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fostta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 06:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nanolute concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nanolute, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sameer Dani

Hello, Skgacharya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sameer Dani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nanolute

Hello, Skgacharya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nanolute".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Manish Doshi

Hello, Skgacharya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manish Doshi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Your edits really, really look highly promotional like you are being paid to make these edits or work for the company or Doshi. Your style is highly promotional and your sources are often primary or are press-releases. Deceptive editing like this is not helpful and will not will you any support. Just make the required declarations that WP:PAID and the Wikipedia Terms of Use (that your agree to with EVERY edit). You also need to stop ignoring the need for good sources and the WP:MOS. Ravensfire (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ravensfire, Everyone here is getting paid for there work or they are associated with them. We often work for free. There are many pages that I personally know and the owner and their company etc still, the pages and the articles are live on Wikipedia. Here my first interest to create articles from them to get knowledge about Wikipedia and to understand. Now I'll not ask you to restore the page or make them live but at list request you to remove all promotional pages and articles from Wiki. I haven't asked you to share personal details etc. You have removed everything from my contribution. Are you especially looking at my edits? Skgacharya (talk) 10:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:MagicTouch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:MagicTouch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 08:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

MER-C 17:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]