Jump to content

User talk:Silverfish2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Silverfish2024! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 20:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Silverfish2024! Your additions to Historical reliability of the Gospels have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for graciously explaining why you removed my post! As a new editor I admit I am not as familiar with Wikipedia and its procedures as I should be. I am confused as to why my edit violated copyright rules, as the exact same passage I entered in this page has been present for a substantial amount of time in the page Oral gospel traditions - Wikipedia. Also as far as I understand, many parts of Wikipedia are sourced by books not available for public viewing without purchase, so I do not see what the problem is here. Silverfish2024 (talk) 01:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will look into this in the morning. — Diannaa (talk) 02:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The online source where I found the content is dated January 2019, but it's been in Oral gospel traditions since December 2013. So we had it first. What you need to do when copying from one article to another is to mention in your edit summary where you got the prose from. In fact such attribution is required under the terms of our license. Please see WP:copying within Wikipedia for more information on this topic. Sorry for the mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! I will try my best to acknowledge whenever I copy from one Wikipedia article to another. Silverfish2024 (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Joshua Jonathan. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gospel seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input on this matter. The historicity of the Gospels is indeed of immense weight to many people religious or not worldwide, and it is difficult for many to set aside prior commitments. However, my recent edit, specifically Evans' quote, which has been present in other pages on Wikipedia for a significant amount of time, does not seem to me problematic. Sanders and Borg are mainstream scholars associated with renowned universities, and Evans' work has also received praise from both Evangelical and mainline scholars such as Charlesworth and Theissen. I also referred to more skeptical scholars as well. I understand your concerns and am grateful for your transparency, but I do not believe this removal was justifiable. Silverfish2024 (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have also noticed that you reverted my edit regarding Charles Gieschen's reception of Bart Ehrman's How Jesus Became God. I cannot imagine how this edit could be considered undue or fringe in any way, especially considering that Ehrman himself found it fitting to use Gieschen's work. Gieschen's view is undoubtedly worth noting. Silverfish2024 (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding Gospel, citing Craig, a conservative scholar, from a publication from 1993 stating "are now viewed as useful" is misleading, to say the least; that'so in the body of the article, and even more so in the lead.
Regarding Gieschen, Ehrman refers to his work three times; it is undue to mention Gieschen's response in a section on the overall reception of the book. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you dispute Evans's description of the state of the field? He does not cite overly conservative scholars there. I am not the first to either have a high appraisal of Evans or to cite him on this wiki.
As for Gieschen, I think Ehrman says he received his view of Christ as an angel from Gieschen and later Susan Garrett. He even blogged about it. I do not think it is prudent to downplay his work or opinions. Silverfish2024 (talk) 18:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1993 is not "now." Have you edited before using another account? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 19:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is my only account. I have only started editing Wikipedia this week. Are you saying I Silverfish2024 (talk) 19:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
was the one who cited Evans in note 2 of Historical Reliability of the Gospels? Silverfish2024 (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen Wikipedia use many sources older than 1993, and I don't think the Biblical studies field has changed enough, even with the developments you and I mentioned, that Evans' claim is now outdated, as far as I know. Silverfish2024 (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gospel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Evans. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Historical reliability of the Gospels, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 22:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old Testament messianic prophecies quoted in the New Testament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Hays.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Civility Barnstar
Thanks for helping with the Gnosticism page with keeping it neutral and keeping my source. =) Shane O'Sullivan the 1 (talk) 19:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Testament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oral gospel traditions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Silverfish2024&oldid=1259798569"