User talk:Shirudo
Regarding your logic.... I will expect you to delete ALL notable examples listed in the "cronyism" page as those examples should also only appear on the individuals pages, that is if we are going to be fair and logical. Until I see that happen, I will continue to reinstate my original edits. I will consider moderating my tone...maybe.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uknowispeaksense (talk • contribs) 05:39, 17 February 2014
- After the above comment Uknowispeaksense then put this on their userpage.(!) - 220 of Borg 08:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Defries or DeFries
[edit]Hi, I wanted to give you a heads-up that I moved the page from Tony DeFries back to Tony Defries. My rationale is as follows. There seems to be some confusion over whether or not to capitalize the F in "defries." The BBC does. The book you mentioned does. The New York Times does currently. However, back in 1986, they didn't. [1] And there are other newspapers which don't. The closest thing I can find to an official website is this LinkedIn profile [2]. Based on that, it seems like he prefers it uncapitalized. So, I moved the article to "Tony Defries." If there is a more definitive source for the spelling—liner notes, legal documents, company website, etc.—I will gladly defer to that. Thanks, GentlemanGhost (converse) 22:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome. It's just my best guess, but hopefully an educated one. It's part-amusing, part-frustrating that even the New York Times hasn't been consistent of the years. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 01:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Shirudo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shirudo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shirudo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)