User talk:ShawnSim

Welcome!

Hello, ShawnSim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Antoine Bonaventure, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of one week, for repeatedly creating hoax articles and articles about non-notable persons, after warnings and explanation, and adding false results to articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have not understood some important things about Wikipedia:

It is a serious collaborative effort to build an encyclopedia. "Anyone can edit" does not mean "anyone can put in whatever they like". Wikipedia only wants contributions which can be verified from reliable sources, and article subjects need to be notable. It is not a place for fantasies, or for things you would like to be true, or for social-network-site type articles about yourself and your friends.
Contributions are likely to be checked. If you claim that someone is a billionnaire, with a link to the Forbes list, that list will be looked at to see if his name is really on it. If you insert someone's name as a medal winner at the 2006 Asian games, when there is no source to support it and he was 9 years old at the time, it will be reverted.
All of your contributions are permanently recorded. You are allowed to blank warnings from your talk page, which is taken to mean that you have read them, but they are still visible in the talk page history. Once it is found that you are making false entries, all your contributions will be checked. So you are really wasting your time, as well as ours.

If you want to continue contributing after your block, read the WP:Introduction, the WP:Five Pillars, and the guide to writing WP:Your first article. Constructive contributions will be welcome, but if you carry on as you have been doing, you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. JohnCD (talk) 11:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Spartan Team

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as The Spartan Team, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

ShawnSim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

118.100.42.121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "FernJoe". The reason given for FernJoe's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Favonian (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are no longer just auto-blocked, but blocked in your own right. Please see explanation below. — Favonian (talk) 12:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on your block

It looks like you and FernJoe have something in common. Care to explain? Favonian (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Hell I will explain! Now listen up, CLOSELY, these are my apartment neighbours, all in the same area, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. GOT IT? You are falsely accusing me as a Sock Puppet, when this is my only Wikipedia account. How is this fair? Now do YOU care to explain?

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShawnSim for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Favonian (talk) 11:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS A PROXY SERVER! CAN'T YOU ALL STOP BLAMING ME FOR ONCE????

September 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for sock puppetry or meat puppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShawnSim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

they are framing me! please help!

Decline reason:

You are not addressing the reason for your block. If you believe you are being "framed", please provide evidence: who are "they", and what diffs can you provide to support your position? -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.