User talk:Shapeyness

Archives: 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024

A barnstar for you!

		The Video Game Barnstar
		Thank you so much for your excellent edits to the Mouthwashing article! Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk \| contribs) 09:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hi.Thank you weighing in at FAc. I will fix the other remaining issues later,and I need to re-access again the Unravel of RE book to finish. I will admit that reception section is really hard to pull through sometimes. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 22:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no problem, hope they all make sense and seem reasonable, also no rush on making any of the changes

Shapeyness (talk) 13:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I already death with your concerns now. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 21:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

-- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gerda Arendt

Shapeyness (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of fictional countries set on Earth on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hi again. I would like to thank you for reviewing Claire Redfield's FAC before. I am wondering if you can also review her brother, Chris Redfield, and leave some comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Chris Redfield/archive1? Many thanks! 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 10:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boneless Pizza!, I read through the article but I don't have many comments so I didn't add to the peer review. One thing I noticed though was: Modeler Yosuke Yamagata said that they "made a new design that retained their signature color—green for Chris, blue for Jill—to carry over the same look from the past." The character's facial features are also mainly based on the visuals in the 2002 remake of Resident Evil, with various details added to arrive at a "realistic structure" Is this bit talking about the design for one of the games in particular? It should mention what design is being talked about if it is. Hopefully that is helpful, can discuss more at the talk page if you want! Shapeyness (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already dealth with it. Thank you! I am nominating it for fac this saturday. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 21:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Parkinson's disease on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Explanatory indispensability argument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Explanatory indispensability argument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Explanatory indispensability argument

The article Explanatory indispensability argument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Explanatory indispensability argument for comments about the article, and Talk:Explanatory indispensability argument/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]