User talk:Shabeelko

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shabeehanswar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shabeehanswar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shabeelko (talk) 04:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shabeelko (talk) 05:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shabeelko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account. I believe there has been a misunderstanding, and I would like to provide some context regarding my account history. Single Account Usage: According to you my original account, User:Shabeehanswar, was blocked eight years ago. After serving the two-year block, I created a new account, User:Shabeelko. Since then, I have consistently used only this account for editing on Wikipedia. Multiple Accounts Policy: According to Wikipedia’s policy, multiple accounts are allowed as long as they serve legitimate purposes. My intention has always been to contribute positively to the community, and I have not violated any policies or engaged in disruptive behavior. Request for Clarification: I kindly request clarification on the specific reason for blocking my account. If there are any concerns related to my editing behavior, I am willing to address them constructively. Appeal for Unblocking: Considering the facts mentioned above, I respectfully request that my account be unblocked. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and contributing positively. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. If you require any additional information, please feel free to reach out to me. Sincerely, Shabee Ahmed

User:Shabeelko

Decline reason:

Self-admitted block evading accounts are not serving "legitimate purposes"; they are exactly the opposite. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shabeelko (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shabeelko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account, User:Shabeelko. :I understand that creating a new account after being blocked is a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies. However, I want to explain that at the time of my original block on User:Shabeehanswar, I was quite young and inexperienced with Wikipedia's rules and regulations. I was unaware of the multiple account policy and the appropriate channels for appealing a block. :Since then, I have matured and gained a better understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to contributing positively to the community and adhering to all policies. :I sincerely apologize for my past mistake and hope to be given another chance. I assure you that I will use this account responsibly and respectfully. :Thank you for your time and consideration. Shabeelko (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

According to multiple sources, this unblock request was generated by an AI. We have no interest in AI chatbots editing Wikipedia so will definitely leave this block in place. Yamla (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shabeelko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the block on my account. I understand that creating new account after being blocked is a violation of Wikipedia's policies.

Since then, I have matured and gained a better understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to contributing positively to commund a adhering to all policies.

I acknowledge that I used an AI tool initially to draft my appeal; but, final version you reviewed was written by me. I apologize for any confusion this might have caused.

I understand that my previous appeal might have raised concerns due to potential AI involvement. I want to assure you that the final appeal you're reviewing is entirely written by me. I checked the text using an AI detection tool (https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector) and the score was only 1-2% While I acknowledge using an AI tool initially to draft ideas, the final version you see is my own work. Shabeelko (talk) 11:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a nice start but doesn't demonstrate your understanding of relevant policies(you don't need to read every policy) nor does it say what edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shabeelko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am eager to contribute to Wikipedia, leveraging my experience and knowledge. I have been instrumental in the creation of several significant projects, including: :Lulu International Shopping Mall, Lucknow, Namo Bharat Rapid Rail, Google Vids, etc. :I intend to create a new page on Wikipedia to document these projects, citing reliable sources to ensure accuracy and verifiability. Additionally, I plan to contribute to the Google Vids page, as Google is set to launch this service later this year. :I am confident that I can be a valuable asset to the Wikipedia community. I appreciate your time and consideration of my appeal.

Decline reason:

According to the tool you previously provided, 49% of this unblock request was written by ChatGPT. As Yamla previously stated, we do not need AI to write the encyclopedia. Please use your own words to indicate that you know why you've been blocked and share what types of edits you would make to Wikipedia if you were unblocked. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shabeelko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my previous unblock request was found to contain content generated by AI tools. I apologize for this and would like to express my genuine commitment to contributing valuable content to Wikipedia community.

For drafting and grammar, I used AI assistance, but the words, ideas, and thoughts are mine. I want to contribute to the existing Google Vids page by providing up to date information about its upcoming launch. And also I want to enhance the pages I have previously created by adding new information.

As student of science, I am eager to update science pages according to recent research papers. Unfortunately, due to my block, I am no longer have access to the Wikipedia library, which I need for referencing and fact-checking. Before my block, I was reading many papers to update certain science pages, and now all of that work is pending. Shabeelko (talk) 09:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see Wikipedia:Large language models. In a nutshell: if you are unable to contribute here without the use of AI tools, then you are not competent to contribute here. You have been told at least three times on this page that unblock requests assisted by AI will not be accepted, but you have continued to submit AI-assisted requests and insist that you should be able to use AI-assisted translation to create content. Therefore you will not be unblocked.

If you submit another AI-assisted unblock request, your talk page access will be revoked. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, please place new posts at the bottom of the page. PhilKnight (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, Shabeelko! Can you explain why you wanted to use AI to help craft your unblock request? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For drafting and grammar, I used AI assistance. but the words, ideas, and thoughts are mine. My primary language is Hindi and I translate my writing into English using AI to ensure clarity and professionalism. I am committed to contributing meaningful content to Wikipedia. Shabeelko (talk) 12:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Given that your primary language is Hindi and you're using AI to help with your English, have you considered contributing to the Hindi Wikipedia? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am contributing to Hindi Wikipedia and also Urdu Wikipedia. I believe that contributing to English, Hindi, and Urdu Wikipedia is a great way to support knowledge sharing in multiple languages. Shabeelko (talk) 15:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]