User talk:Sethie

/Archive4 1/08- 11/08 Thanks for you response to my request for changing-title protocols, but I don't understand your point. I accepted editor Interstellarity's advice to use WP:RM#CM, which put my intent on the Situational analysis talk page. I don't expect any response, since the article has not been revised or generated any talk since it was first posted. Any reason I should do more?TBR-qed (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sethie: I used half of you suggestion for title-changing, but got the unwanted result of 2 titles for a single text: situational logic (desired) and situational analysis (to be eliminated). Can you sort out this mess? Thanks.TBR-qed (talk) 15:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sahaj Marg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samskaras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! fixed it! Sethie (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sethie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your nice wording[1]. I 'd like to let you know that I am not a native speaker of English, that Christian Persecution Complex is my first article in en.WP, therefore any help on the intro, would be appriciated! Τζερόνυμο (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Of all the years I've been doing this on Wikipedia, this the first time I actually receive such a positive message. Thank you for that, I really appreciate it.190.249.179.87 (talk) 01:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Regarding the Anna Faris edit; I thought it was fine to just mention the sequel's name and its release, as her character wasn't even mentioned when the first film is talked about in the article.

Warm greetings!

Fake info on E. O. Smith High School article

Hey, just wanted to let you know why I reverted your edit. The architecture info appears to be a high-quality bit of vandalism. The "Lorenzo von Matterhorn" individual named as architect is a pop culture reference (see The Playbook (How I Met Your Mother) and the Lorenzo von Matterhorn wiki used as a citation). PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Pena Edit

Hey there - I just wanted to point you to the talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Daniel_S._Pe%C3%B1a_Sr.#Rewrite_on_April_18,_2018) where I gave some info on why I'm skeptical about that Times of India article (in addition to what I noted, I can't find any information as to what the "IACMM" court *is*). In either case, I agree with you - if it's true, it should absolutely be there. Axcviii (talk) 02:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you're watching the page, but I just responded to the Talk discussion. What do you think should be done? It's a little tricky, and I want to be fair to both sides. Axcviii (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2018 (UTC-7)

Sharon Stone

Hey, Sethie, I first edited the Sharon Stone filmography article a year ago, excluding the awards from the tables, and putting more info in the lead, and some guy repeatedly reverted the edits, causing the page to be blocked. I recently did the changes again, to the same response from the same user. Can you check out the edits and give your honest opinion about the changes; I thinks its more reasonable this way as there is a whole article exclusively for awards and nominations, but the user's attitude is pretty ugly to deal with.

Thank you :) 190.249.179.87 (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sethie. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About this..... Keep in mind the sheer number of errors made by the people who "investigated me."

1)TantaYum was not a sockpupper. I never made a single edit with it. It was a typo for TantraYum. Verdict of the investigative committee: It was a sockpuppet that I had abused.

2)Devalover was LEGITIMATE sockpuppet. I used it soley for editing prostitution and sex worker related topics- which according to the sockpuppet guidelines, IS ALLOWED> Verdict of the investigative committee: It was a sockpuppet that I had abused.

3)TantraYum, minus ONE accidental comment on a talk page (meaning I posted as Sethie and then accidentally as TantraYum) engaged in NO sockpuppetry. The two accounts were not active on the same page at the same time or even within MONTHS of each other. Verdict of the investigative committee: It was a sockpuppet that I had abused.

4)I created TantraYum to protect my privacy, Sethie reveals my given name, I told this directly to the person running the investigation, he didn't believe me.

5) As TantraYum I did 97% RC patrol, aka patrolling for vandalism.

6) I was accused of being yet another sockpuppet by this committee. To their credit they at laest they admitted they were wrong about.

7) All I was interested in doing was protecting my privacy.

8) If anyone had ASKED, I would have told them all of this, instead, they started an adversarial investigation.

While I honor that they were trying to protect wikipedia... a beautiful need and wish, their strategy for doing so sucked and was erroneous on multiple levels (see above).

The facts speak for themselves.... as do the diminishing number of editors on wikipedia, ala instances like this. Sethie (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sethie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian Universalist Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divinization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Magic Carpet Ride (Steppenwolf song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not edit war on this article. Please do not use a sockpuppet to restore the unsourced material. Thank you. 173.209.178.244 (talk) 18:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

)

You removed material saying it was trivia. I disagreed, put it back in, and this is your response?

Good luck with things here on wikipedia.... Sethie (talk) 01:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed material that was unsourced per WP:V, and the above is your response? Good luck with following Wikipedia policies. 75.191.40.148 (talk) 01:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Imitation is the highest form of flattery... and you are twisting the facts.... goodbye. Sethie (talk) 01:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KÜHL (clothing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wasatch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

title-changing protocols

Thanks for you response to my question, but I don't understand your response. I accepted editor Interstellarity's suggested to post at WP:RM#CM, which put my intent on the Situational analysis talk page. I do not expect a response, since that article has not been revised or generated talk since it was first posted. Any reason for me to do more?TBR-qed (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Prince

Sorry, but I see nothing that seems reasonably sourced. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Wow- appreciate the courtesy of sharing why you reverted. There were a number of sources in there- if you feel they don't meet wp:rs or aren't being accurately cited, I won't argue.... I was just on Vandalism patrol. Thanks again for dropping by. Sethie (talk) 03:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ian.thomson (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sethie. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Johanna Warren, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Universal reconciliation into Draft:History of Christian Universalism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]