User talk:Serban.tanasa

Welcome

Hello Serban.tanasa and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self-expression Values

Thanks for the message. Not sure whether you saw my comments at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/Archive22#Self Expression Values. It's basically a question of tone - the article reads like a university term paper, rather than an article you would find in an encyclopedia. For example, the opening sentence: Scholars have argued that self-expression values are part of a core value dimension in the modernization process is what you would find in an essay. An encyclopedia article would begin: Self-expression values are.... Also, it's not clear whether the article contains your own conclusions based on the sources you have cited -- if it does, it is original reasearch or a synthesis of published material that advances your own conclusions, both of which are inappropriate for Wikipedia. If you would like further comments, please post a message at Requests for Editor Assistance. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]