User talk:Semper honestus

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Semper honestus! Thank you for your contributions. I am GizzyCatBella and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GizzyCatBella🍁 08:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks comrade. Do you too disdain fascism?Semper honestus (talk) 08:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s continue the conversation. So what about those finances? No? How are you doing anyway? - GizzyCatBella🍁 08:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs is a good finance system.Semper honestus (talk) 08:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good one! [1] So how you have been? Bored? -GizzyCatBella🍁 09:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do I know you? I do appreciate the use of your abilities to furnish cookies for the virtual satisfaction of my material needs.Semper honestus (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know, do you? - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Real talers have the same existence that the imagined gods have. Has a real taler any existence except in the imagination, if only in the general or rather common imagination of man? Bring paper money into a country where this use of paper is unknown, and everyone will laugh at your subjective imagination.Semper honestus (talk) 09:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Authentic talers have the same reality that the assumed spirits possess. Would a true taler have any life without the imagination, if only in the standard or somewhat normal vision of man? Bring paper currency into a country where this use of bills is unknown, and everyone will giggle at your fabrications. Top-notch! GizzyCatBella🍁 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, got to go, see you later somewhere - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just as Darwin discovered the law of development of organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of development of human history: the simple fact, hitherto concealed by an overgrowth of ideology, that mankind must first of all eat, drink, have shelter and clothing, before it can pursue politics, science, art, religion, etc.Semper honestus (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peoplekind Semper honestus --> [[2]] come on! Okay, see ya later, got to do now, really - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?. Shouldn't you be placing this warning on your own talk page? I am discussing the removal of this non-neutral label.Semper honestus (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you because you're acting very similar to a banned user, Icewhiz. And if you are Icewhiz.... I can't believe your ass. You're bitter and vengeful now, nothing like the Icewhiz I knew. Do yourself a favor and never edit wikipedia again. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 02:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]