July 2013 =

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bokator. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Please take the time to understand what Wikipedia is and how it works before continuing. This is not a forum for advertising schools, it's an encyclopedic article. All info needs to be sourced to a reliable published source. Your additions are not encyclopedic, bad English, and, most importantly, are not backed up by published reliable sources. You can't just add what you "think is true" or add random names of schools. I encourage you to learn Wikipedia policies before continuing. You might also benefit from reading Bold, Revert, Discuss, Edit Warring and Three Revert Rule. Once you introduce a change to a page, and it is reverted, it is customary to open discussion on the article's talk page and cite sources and reach consensus with other editors. Don't keep trying to re-insert the contested content. That's not the way things are done and could lead to your account being blocked from editing. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 05:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am very surprise by your message reading actually a lot of nonsense and wrong information in the Bokator section without any references. In what i am doing advertising when at the end i inform about the school of Yutakhun Khom. I am certainly more inform by my research about any of you "articles" about khmer sport and martial art dear gentleman. If you still keeping wrong information, create by a marketing specialist wich is the "gold Krama" i will also Thereat you about Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is a place where we can contribute, it is not a newspaper and partisan. Let the place to specialist and let the truth coming. Best regards

I can barely comprehend what your are trying to say, but my only response is that you need to learn what wikipedia is before taking on such matters. Yes it is a place where people can contribute. But you can not just write whatever you want or whatever you think is true. This is an encyclopedia, academic in nature, and all information you wish to add must be from a published reliable source, not just out of your head. I have supplied you with starting places to learn more. I strongly suggest you read the links I included above and after you understand how things work here, we can have a discussion about the article.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 06:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thx William, but the article is already full of non refere allegation, and it will be long but I can give all details about non truth and non references elements in this article. I wish it is not the first who right who have the truth because this is dramatic. We are working actually with UNESCO about it so it will be clear. I gonna read again more about Wiki policy and will bring more details in the wiki way. Kind Regards