User talk:Sebbers10

Suggestion

My suggestion would be that you refrain from commenting on Holy S's page further; see WP:GRAVEDANCING. 331dot (talk) 18:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thanks for letting me know. Sebbers1010292929 (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk page responses

Stop engaging with trolls and egging vandals on please.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, Have a nice day! Sebbers10 (talk) 20:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Turkey, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, its just that turkey reminds me of turkey.. mmm.. turkey murkey.... yum.. Sebbers10 (talk) 17:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

beep boop

im a robot Sebbers10 (talk) 16:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Welcome!

Hi Sebbers10! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Palestine/Israel conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to Palestine/Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to your being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i accidentally reverted someone elses instead of the sandals, sorry for the inconvenience. Sebbers10 (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it was an accident, im sure. Sebbers10 (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For putting out the fire on my user page, and getting the sandbox seized by the UN. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 14:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sebbers10/Vandalistan

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Sebbers10/Vandalistan, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Giraffer (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to put the humorous thing on it, i accept the deletion, and im sorry. Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 16:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now im a bit scared of my actions. Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 16:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it isnt intended for hoax or vandalism, it was simply a inspiration of hemlock martinis Kingdom of wikipedia. Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 16:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond ;-; Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 16:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of content unrelated to editing doesn't really belong on Wikipedia -- you can find some info on what should and shouldn't be in userpace here (particularly the bit on entertainment pages). On a related note, could I ask you to tag this page for deletion? It's disruptively long and doesn't seem to serve any purpose other than slowing down people's browsers. You can stick {{db-u1}} at the top to do so. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the edit is publishing hold on. Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 16:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you want it deleted, then do so, im sorry. Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 16:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

welcome (for real)

Hello, Sebbers10, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Below are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 04:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 04:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seems like you never got a proper, normal welcome here. i've placed one of my favorite welcome templates above. hope you enjoy your time here - there's plenty to do! :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 04:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am finally welcomed :D Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 14:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

..And im not welcome here anymore. Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 03:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebbers10

I would advise taking a wikibreak and then admitting mea culpa if you'd like to get unblocked. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 12:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with User:JayCubby. I appreciate your anti-vandalism edits and good faith, but making the kind of edits that User:Ingenuity has highlighted below is unacceptable here. I respect you as an editor, and I'd love to see you back at some point, so I definitely recommend you take up the standard offer. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour, to put it frankly, has been completely immature. This is not acceptable. This is unnecessary. This comment, this AfD, another comment, and User:Sebbers10/Vandalistan are all disruptive. This edit could be considered harassment. And these are all from the past few days alone. I'm sorry, but I do not think you have the maturity to be editing Wikipedia. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=So what ill do is just stop editing wikipedia for a long time, i am sorry for what i've done. Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 18:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sebbers10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the harrasment thing was by another user, I regret making the humiliation badge , I am very sorry, That was a joke, The AFD was an april fools joke, A joke, and something i sincerely regret, Im sorry for ruining the community and hope i can come back, See ya! Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 03:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't tell us what edits you will make instead, or why we should trust that your prior actions will not repeat. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2024

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Zinnober9 (talk) 14:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to be unblocked

@Sebbers10: I have read through a few unblock requests across my time on Wikipedia, and I have noticed which ones tend to be accepted. To make a successful unblock request, you need to explain what you did wrong, promise to not do it again, and explain what kind of productive edits you will make instead. By the way, editing other people's user pages is typically not allowed unless you have permission or are reverting vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and might I add you have a shot at getting unblocked provided you follow quicole's instructions. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 18:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think its over for me anyway, I dont even know what to do anymore. Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 15:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebbers10: You could try editing the Simple English Wikipedia for a while. Good editing there usually helps with getting unblocked. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm intrigued that no one has brought up the most important factor for successful unblock requests: time. The Standard offer puts a 6-month threshold of waiting or editing another wiki without disruption before any unblock can considered plausible. In my opinion, the threshold in this case is longer than 6 months unless you can prove that you will not repeat behavior that resulted in your block ("persistent disruptive and immature editing", including editor interaction that "could be considered harassment"). You can prove this constructively by editing the Simple Wikipedia and by showing no signs of immaturity in discussions or editor interactions over there. ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 10:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC); edited 10:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sebbers10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have now understood what i´ve done wrong, I have made disruptive edits toward the wikipedia community, made unreasonable pages, an attack, editing userpages. i promise that i will never do these things again. I would spend my time fixing typos from now and then, Im sorry for what i have done, and i promise that this would not happen again, hopefully we can come with a solution. Yours truly, seb. Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 15:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The benefit from fixing trivial typos is significantly outweighed by the harm you demonstrated previously. Best you remain blocked. If you want to be unblocked, I suggest editing another wiki somewhere. Build up a set of non-trivial edits with no problems and we'll be happy to reconsider this block on this wiki. Yamla (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well.

sorry for everything, Sebbers10 I talk to cute people :3 20:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to appeal your block

I successfully got my own indef lifted, as well as a global lock. You've made edits to simplewiki, which is a good indicator, as well as it having been several months. Jay Cubby 02:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]