User talk:Scottgwikip

{{hangon}} I see multiple references written by people who are directly related to the organization they are writing about. Our references on either our company page or the comparison of network monitoring systems page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_network_monitoring_systems. The comparison offers no explicit means of validation that is different from what we have posted. Our company page offers 3rd party references to the basic information we have posted - and offers no neutrality difference that that of other company listings. Rather than simple tag and remove - why not offer suggestions on where changes should or must be made with a reference to other relevant site as an example. While I have read (and understand) the conflicts of interest) - I still do not see where our entries differ from others in terms of verifiable content.

I am all for direct questioning of integrity - It appears that the effort to suppress commercial content is unjust - as AccelOps content should be treated no differently than the companies above. Where is the "higher authority" Scottgwikip (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of SDCA91902 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Conflict of Interest - AccelOps

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

{{hangon}} I see no difference in the content supplied by AccelOps as the source and that of all the other vendors on this page. This removal is discriminating new vendors from being added to this reference list. In addition, our wikipage listing was also market for deletion - even with 3rd party references clearly listed. If there is evidence to the contrary, please provide. Else, our listing on this comparison chart (and our AccelOps page) should remain in tact and those opposing should be flagged. Scottgwikip (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AccelOps

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on AccelOps, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of AccelOps and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lahnfeear (talk) 20:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AccelOps, Inc.

http://.accelops.net

Accounts

Scottgwikip (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
SDCA91902 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
24.6.85.178 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 05:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of AccelOps

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is AccelOps. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccelOps. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]