User talk:Scifireal

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Alan Au 07:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collective authorship and understanding

Collective authorship and understanding has been proposed for deletion. Please review WP:OR and WP:NEO for relevant concerns and improve the article if possible. NickelShoe 22:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Drobnick article

Suggest you beef up your Jim Drobnick article. Otherwise some of our more vigilant editors will tag it for deletion. Cheers - Williamborg (Bill) 05:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

I'm going to email this to you as well, but...

Your edits to create the article Thierry Delva took a large chunk of copyrighted text from DOCUMENTARY SCULPTURE], an essay by Steven Holmes. The author contacted Wikipedia complaining about the copyright violation, which I am in the process of rewriting to remove.

This sort of behavior is not acceptable for Wikipedia editors. Material has to be your original work or otherwise public domain or licensed under the GFDL. Just grabbing text off websites is an abuse of the authors' rights and of Wikipedia.

I would like to request that you come back to Wikipedia and help us by identifying any of the other articles you created which you also grabbed content off the web like that. Any assistance you can give as to where the sources were from, for any other copyright violation articles you may have created, will help us minimize the damage in this situation.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 22:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Rita McKeough

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rita McKeough, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rita McKeough is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rita McKeough, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Mark Dicey

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunderland06 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 2007 December 20

I got a copyright violation tag on material I contributed back in 2005. (My tag was placed by a malicious contributor who later turned out to be a rogue POV-pushing sockpuppet.) When I looked at the discussion fora for copyright violations it seemed to me at least half of the violations were either honest mistakes, or cases where the contributor was the original author of the material on the other site, and they just didn't know how to make clear that they were authorized to use that text.

I think this is the contribution that triggered the concern. If you are the original author of this image -- or you know the original author, and they will release it under a "free" liscense, then that image will comply with policy, and can be restored. Similarly, if you are the original author of the text from the paul kuhn gallery, you are free to reliscense its use here. If you can convince the original author to release it, it can be used here.

You can get help on how to do this.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tactical Art Coalition

A tag has been placed on Tactical Art Coalition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. freshacconcispeaktome 11:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EMMAX

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article EMMAX, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of EMMAX. B. Wolterding (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Crystal Mowry

A tag has been placed on Crystal Mowry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Canis Lupus 15:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thierry Delva

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thierry Delva, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sources found to support notability of the artist. Secondary sources only attest to the fact that he has participated in a group exhibition and a University symposium.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dick Averns

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dick Averns, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unclear notability, insufficient coverage in reliable sources and no sources cited in article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Snigbrook 00:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dick Averns

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dick Averns, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Averns. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. snigbrook (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Scifireal! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Norman White - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joanne Bristol - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Don Simmons (artist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Laura Vickerson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jennifer Fisher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joanne Bristol

The article Joanne Bristol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 02:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Horne

The article Stephen Horne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Googled Stephen Horne writer - this Stephen Horne is non notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mark^Dask 16:08, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Horne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Horne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Horne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benny Nemerofsky Ramsay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benny Nemerofsky Ramsay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Nemerofsky Ramsay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Don Kottmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Kottmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Kottmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]