User talk:Scarbrd2020

This is Scarbrd2020's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Gomel : Eyewitness (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Modussiccandi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add sources before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scarbrd2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Gomel : Eyewitness (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 01:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Gomel : Eyewitness

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scarbrd2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I was blocked. I am very new at this. I apologize if I am not doing this properly. I created a documentary. A friend suggested that I create a wikipedia article for it. The content is fact based, There is no promotion are sales pitch. I am the subject matter expert on the topic. Please let me know how best to create a wiki article for the documentary. I am not trying to do anything but make an informational article about the movie Bob Gomel : Eyewitness. Please advise. Thank you. 69.216.117.100 (talk) 02:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request was made by an IP address. If that was you, remember to log in before making other posts. You seem to misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia; it is not for merely providing information. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to state about (in this case) a film, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable film. Wikipedia is not interested in what people want to say about their own work; if you just want to tell the world about your work, you should use social media, your own website, or other alternative where that is permitted. Since you don't indicate what contributions that are unrelated to your conflict of interest you might make, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 02:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bob Gomel : Eyewitness, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Possibly (talk) 22:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scarbrd2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for trying to create a wiki article for a documentary I produced, Bob Gomel : Eyewitness. I was accused of trying to promote the film via wiki. I wasn't. I have other avenues online, web site, Facebook, etc for promoting. I understand now I need more outside credibility for the film to create a stand alone article. The subject of the film, Bob Gomel, has a wiki article about him. I would like to add the information about the documentary of which he is the subject to the wiki article about him. I am requesting to be unblocked so I can submit the information about the documentary about Mr. Gomel to the wiki page about Mr. Gomel. Thank you.

Decline reason:

If you agree to follow our best practices for editors with a conflict of interest, you'll probably be unblocked. Because you're only interested in writing about a topic with which you have a clear and obvious COI, we'd like to be sure that you understand our rules and won't spam our website. Writing about your own work is something that few people can do without any unconscious bias. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you read, and do you understand WP:COI? How, in your own words, would that policy apply to the edits you wish to make? SQL ^{Query me!} 00:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the COI article.

I understand the concerns enumerated in the article.

As for editing the Bob Gomel wiki page with the information about the documentary on Bob Gomel, Bob Gomel : Eyewitness, I am the subject matter expert on the film as I produced and directed it. A such, I am the most appropriate person to enter the facts in the section in Bob Gomel's wiki page about the documentary.

As per the policy, I will declare my involvement in the project.

However, as I understand the policy, I have no COI pertaining to the parent article about Bob Gomel. I understand how I would have a COI on an independent article about the film I made. (I did not fully understand that when I submitted the original article.)

My edit will be factual and not contain any effort to promote the film. I plan to include a list of the stories covered in the film with links to the appropriate wiki articles on the subjects covered, the platform(s) where it can be watched, award nominations and wins, and background on how the film was made.

I have journalistic experience and understand objectivity in writing these types of articles. I am versed in the AP Stylebook for media writing from my days freelancing with AP.

I will welcome scrutiny on my edits to ensure I meet all the requirements and do not run afoul of any rules, including CIO.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you for your time. Scarbrd2020 (talk) 22:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

__________________________________

2-6-2021 Looking for an update. Am i editing this incorrectly? Scarbrd2020 (talk) 22:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2-14-2021 - I have not received any update on this. Please advice if I am not doing this r=correctly. Thank you. Scarbrd2020 (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]