User talk:Scalapaedia

Welcome!

Hi Scalapaedia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I've been working on an article and would like to have it scrutinized for validity and potential COI, considering my experience with the subject's parent company. Should I jst post something in the Teahouse with a link, or would the right experts find it based on this message? It's at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scalapaedia/subpage

Scalapaedia (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Publication through wp:AfC is the best option for new users and users who feel they may have COI. Just put {{subst:submit}} at the top to submit it for review. Happy editing! Happy Squirrel (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the quality of the sources could be better. For example, The DSSV damper design has also been popular and successful among teams competing in international-level endurance races - that statement cites three sources, but all three are Multimatic press releases. While it's unsurprising that they say their own product is "popular and successful", such a claim would need independent verification. A good place to ask for more specific help, beyond submitting it for a review as Happy Squirrel suggests, would be the talk page of a relevant WikiProject, say WT:WikiProject Automobiles or WT:WikiProject Motorsport. Huon (talk) 18:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Standardized heading capitalizations

As you can see from Wikipedia:Writing better articles capitalising each word in a heading is the opposite of the standardised wikipedia practice. Please discontinue such edits. --Falcadore (talk) 09:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multimatic DSSV (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Multimatic. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Multimatic DSSV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Scalapaedia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Multimatic DSSV concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Multimatic DSSV, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Multimatic DSSV

Hello, Scalapaedia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Multimatic DSSV".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]