User talk:SarajevMoska

November 2023

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Siege of Sur (2016) can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SarajevMoska (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So I get blocked for reverting back the vandalism and wrong informarion of other users on Wikipedia? Realy? Is that what this site has become to? There has been a user named Jalal1229 who kept vandalizing these articles yet he still didn't get blocked? Or what about the user named? TRAVERA1? He literally did the same thing? What sort of a two faced hypocrtites are running this site? Im not allowed to fix, remove wrong infornation even though I asked them to use the talk page first? And after all of this Wikipedia still asks for some donations from its users? Yeah, sure I will give some to a site that doesn't respect its edditors, blocks them for doing nothing wrong and has admins who dont act against obviuos vandalisers on this site. You know what, don't even unblock me at this point anymore. I'm done with this wikipedia thing. Perhaps get some proper admins first who protect the articles from vandalism rather than blocking the ones doing that job intead (!) SarajevMoska (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

OK. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SarajevMoska (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't expect a proper reply from any of these incompetent, useless admins anyway. Bye. SarajevMoska (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]