User talk:Sara M. Davin

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Nova Science Publishers. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Vrac (talk) 20:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vrac, I hope I am posting in the right area. You do not want me to post on your Talk Page. But it says that "you must notify them on their user talk page" when you start a dispute. So that is what I am doing. Look forward to hearing from you.

PS. Dear Vrac, I would argue that your edits are actually disruptive.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 20:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI editors have an obvious extra burden: to produce non-neutral edits. You were asked repeatedly to explain your edits and have refused to do so, which is why you are now blocked as a disruptive edit/edit warrior. When this block is over, you may discuss the matter on the talk page, to which Vrac has invited you. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]