User talk:SallySharpeIrvin

Welcome!

Hello, SallySharpeIrvin!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is SallySharpeIrvin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

June 2021

Your edit to Robert Ritchie (Australian politician) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. EN-Jungwon 01:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Speare’s Brickworks

Hello, SallySharpeIrvin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Speare’s Brickworks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving things about

You need more understanding of what goes where first. I have resolved the interesting state you left things in. Please ask for help, perhaps at WP:TEAHOUSE until you are sure about what to do. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taubman's (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Draft:Taubmans Paints. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The target is the more complete draft. Please merge anything useful there and then blank this version to signify that it may be deleted

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taubman's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SallySharpeIrvin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taubmans Paints (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE. The references are insufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taubmans Paints and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speare’s Brickworks (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE. The references are insufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speare’s Brickworks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speare’s Brickworks (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

Poorly formatted, and would take a long time to correct.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speare’s Brickworks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taubman's (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Ok, you prefer not to be guided to the alternate version. That's fine, but please only work on one, not both.

Please read and apply WP:REFB and WP:CITE, which is, broadly, the comment I left at Draft:Taubmans Paints, and make sure your references are of the high quality required to verify that Taubman's passes WP:NCORP.

I've only reviewed this a second time because you chose to work here instead of there, and I felt you were owed the more formal review. I almost never review a draft more than once

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taubman's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 04:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not work on two parallel identical drafts

It wastes your time and it wastes our time. Please abandon one of them. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 04:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to decide which draft you want to continue working on, Draft:Taubmans Paints or Draft:Taubman's. Let us know, and we will turn the other into a redirect to the one you're keeping. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Taubmans Paints has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Taubmans Paints. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taubmans Paints (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taubmans Paints and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of bold in articles

Hi, I noticed that you tend to overuse bold in articles. In short: use bold in the lead sentence for the article name, and for any name/term that is a redirect to the article. Please don't use bold on names/terms that are not redirects. You can learn more at MOS:BOLD. Hope that helps! Schazjmd (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstood my message. Some aspects of the article will display in bold intentionally, such as headings. My message was about adding bold to the prose sections. Schazjmd (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel Taubman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathaniel Taubman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Speare moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Peter Speare. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Your sources are poor. dead links in a brand new article are inexcusable. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not working the way you want, I think

Please, for the present, use the process of WP:AFC and create drafts which you submit for review, and use those reviews to improve the drafts.

Please study HELP:YFA in detail and WP:REFB after that. Yes, you are allowed not to use AFC, but look at the results you are getting. Even Mozart had to learn the easy stuff first. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Taubman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nathaniel Taubman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and page needs to be formatted correctly and layout also needs fixing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]