User talk:Salad Days

Any sections of this talk page older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Salad Days/Archive by Werdnabot.


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #149

Re:Dead end pages: clearing redlinks

I will take it on my user page. (Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talk) 21:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outstanding! Thank you! Salad Days 21:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Your swift response to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Something strange for you to consider is required, with an explanation of what is going on. Daniel 11:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I created that account and had it blocked to create mischief. Salad Days 14:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked indefinitely. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 14:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Salad Days, you're such a good contributor! I wish you hadn't done that. Hopefully you will appeal in order to lighten your block. The Evil Spartan 14:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that does seem a little severe. Salad Days 14:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should have thought about the consequences before you did this. Sean William 14:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The consequences apparently have no sliding scale? It's either "you're blocked," or you're not? Salad Days 14:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Stupid thing to do? Yes. Indef block? No. Too far. We don't indef block valuable regulars who lose their cool once. We don't even indefblock regular vandals who do that. This is hardly a preventative block. This user probably could have become an admin if he/she had wished. The Evil Spartan 14:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with The Evil Spartan that an indef block for a first offense is a bit unfair. Jayden54 17:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. Good luck! Salad Days 19:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The block isn't punishment, it's to protect the project. This wasn't a silly prank or a 3RR, it was a premeditated disruption of high order. He registered a username and committed deliberate vandalism with it to get it blocked. This user will probably not become an admin, not with this misstep in judgment as an indicator. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not the first time, either... [1]. Endorse indef block. Daniel 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:Bulwer'sPheasant.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Bulwer'sPheasant.jpg, by Strangerer (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Bulwer'sPheasant.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Bulwer'sPheasant.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planning another dead-end page update?

It's been a while since the last one - "my" T section is just about empty. But more editors seem to have become active on the other pages after the N-way split, so I understand it if you want to wait a while still... --Alvestrand 08:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Beef

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Cool Beef, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.129.222.212 12:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Katbite

An article that you have been involved in editing, Katbite, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katbite. Thank you. Optigan13 07:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Battling green eye shades

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Battling green eye shades, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Battling green eye shades is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Battling green eye shades, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Icehelmet.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Icehelmet.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AnrLogo.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:AnrLogo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ata island.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ata island.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maggots (Corpse Bride)

I have nominated Maggots (Corpse Bride), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggots (Corpse Bride). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Scapler (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Wolfe+585, Senior

Talk:Wolfe+585, Senior, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Wolfe+585, Senior and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Wolfe+585, Senior during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 12:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Religions.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Religions.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 19:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hardboiledeggz

The article Hardboiledeggz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BAND. Award won is not a major music award, no other assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. January (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Religions.png

Thank you for uploading File:Religions.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Green Corps

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Green Corps, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of postal codes in Barbados for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of postal codes in Barbados is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postal codes in Barbados until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 15:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of postal codes in Croatia

The article List of postal codes in Croatia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY: consensus to delete "just a list of postal codes" articles demonstrated in previous AfDs ([2], [3]).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]