User talk:Safwaf
October 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm LaffyTaffer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Darwin Del Fabro have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LaffyTaffer (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @LaffyTaffer hope you are doing good. I reverted the edits in accordance to Wikipedia's tone policy. As a new editor I do believe I might have made a mistake, however, as far as I know, there is no policy of Wikipedia that suggests that articles be written in the tone of the preferred pronoun of the person themselves. As far as I have read, the best that can be done, according to the policies is that we write the article in encyclopedic tone, and write a line that, "So and so prefer so and so pronouns" with reference.
- Maybe there is a policy about the use of gender pronouns, if so, kindly share such policy, so I could learn more. Thank you. Safwaf (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, you can read about it over at MOS:GENDERID. Hope that helps :) LaffyTaffer (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @LaffyTaffer it does. thanks Safwaf (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, you can read about it over at MOS:GENDERID. Hope that helps :) LaffyTaffer (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Look2cool per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Look2cool. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Spicy (talk) 09:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.