User talk:Safi Bhatti

Hi, i'm Safi Bhatti. Today, I Show you This one.

I got this for myself Beeshoney

Welcome to the talk page

Archives


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #179

Welcome to Wikipedia. Today, I Show you this in This Progarm, You have to Stay Home. As of Make Pages, we Help to do that. Now, we go to the votes and banstars. Thanks. Safi Bhatti (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Play on

Help on and join this Safi Bhatti (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC) We are Joining This[reply]

Make

Vote this Page and Making Pages. Next time I Show you this one.

Events

Making Edits | May 20, 2020 / Blocking Pages | May 21, 2020 / Unblock | Augest 19, 2020

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for significant competency issues that make editing constructively extremely unlikely. This includes edits by this account and their logged-out edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 04:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Users

Ponyo & Beeshoney

Makers

Welocme to the Maps of the rest Google & Lenovo PC.

UTRS 30665

UTRS #30665 was submitted on 2020-05-21 04:58:46. This review is now closed. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS #30833

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30833 is now closed. Response carried over:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that either the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks for more information.

--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 04:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

lockin

before, due to badlist — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:4400:1520:FA3F:51FF:FE87:AFAE (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Safi Bhatti. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safi Bhatti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can be unblocked Safi Bhatti (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 45948

UTRS appeal #45948 has been closed.01:49, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Safi_Bhatti/Archive#10 July 2021 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]