User talk:ST47/Archive6
This is an archive of discussions past. Please do not edit this page, and instead visit User talk:ST47 if you want to leave me a comment.
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47. |
 |
Contents
Here it is: ready for conoms.[edit]Just don't go ahead and add it until you're ready, and make sure the dates are accurate. Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/ST47_5#General_comments ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 19:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tony Blair signature.svg)[edit]
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC) AccReqBot stopped[edit]AccReqBot has stopped operating. Hopefully that doesn't come as a surprise to you! :) —Wknight94 (talk) 05:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Aztec On The River[edit]Hello again, The article about the Aztec theatre does not seem to be on line yet. Is that normal ? Thanks a lot Kind regards 71.42.159.19 00:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)charou
195.110.173.55[edit]So I respond to an editor and I'm accused of "attacking" them? You guys really are fascists, aren't you? THERE IS NO INHERENT TRUTH.
I don't see anything pejorative in calling a fascist a fascist. 00:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Aztec On The River[edit]Hello I've registered the page under the name Aztec on the River The official name is Aztec On The River with capital letters I cannot manage to edit the title of the page Would you be so kind to do so ? Thank you very much Kind regards 66.64.4.169 18:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)charou
Talk page tabs[edit]Thanks for your comments on the proposal. You said "If that isn't clear enough, change it, but leave a message is just taking up space." But there are several other proposals there that take up less space, like "New comment". You are opposed to all of those? — Omegatron 12:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]I couldn't figure it out. Sorry for the trouble! ZapBoy (contribs) (sign here) 13:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Your request was a little vague, but initial approvals are active, additional question has been added as well. See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/STBot 9. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 21:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Your bot[edit]Your bot seems to be running awfuly fast (>30edits/min) are your tasks so time sensistive this is required? — xaosflux Talk 21:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Broken talk pages[edit]Hi - About Wikipedia:Bot requests#Broken talk pages, I noticed STBot started fixing them, but then stopped (after two). Are you simply still testing it or did you get distracted by something or what? There's really no big hurry or anything - just curious. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 21:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this BRFA[edit]Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Android Mouse Bot req3. I don't mean to sound impatient, but it's noncontroversial and hasn't recieved a BAG response for about a week. Also goodluck on your RFA, looks like it will close successfully. --Android Mouse 13:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Ingria and ru-sib links[edit]Your bot did it again, for at least the sixth time: [1]. Please, please, please, do something to fix this bot of yours (and the others, i.e. the whole interwiki.py gang). This must be stopped. Please also see my recent posting to the Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard, which was the third posting of mine to a relevant board to which I have had no response at all from any of the bot owners. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, but...[edit]Hey ST47, thanks for approving SkyBot 1 for a trial run. However, it may be a little while before I actually get the time, what with my limited time here (schools back), to do the trial run. I hope this is ok. Also, being entirely honest, I'm still trying to make myself understand WP:AWB/CFD - I have followed the file path to Pugins, but I cannot find the Recategorise per CFD 'main menu item'. Thanks, -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello[edit]Congrats on becoming a sysop. I've sent you an e-mail. Sean William @ 18:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Request[edit]Please consider undoing your recent deletion of User talk:Cool Cat/Archive 2005/08 and User talk:Cool Cat/Archive 2005/09, because these pages are subject of ongoing controversy on WP:ANI (see relevant thread). Despite White Cat's claim, "speedy deletion" of these pages is a controversial issue, because the deletion break a lot of links from talk pages. Thank you for your time. >Radiant< 13:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikiconfusion[edit]Was I correct on tagging the articles created by User:Theladyboo? I am not certain and it seems both her and I are confused. -WarthogDemon 22:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Calendar & Clock[edit]Hello ST47 can you tell me plz how can i have a calendar and time clock as you have got on your user page?--Adeelbutt88 talk 17:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Code2000 talk page history[edit]When you undeleted Code2000 per DRV, did you check the talk page and its history? It seems curious that the only comments I see are ones made while the article was in deletion limbo. If there is no prior talk, no worries; but if there is a prior talk history, we should get that back as well. You can reply here if you wish. Thanks. --KSmrqT 04:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
DRV overturn[edit]I noticed you closed Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_18#Category:Films_by_shooting_location_.28closed.29 It was intended to overturn all the subcats that were deleted in the original debate. Do I have to do a separate DRV for that or are those being processed as a part of this? --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Tavares[edit]You incorrectly add pt:Tavares (Rio Grande do Sul) to the article on Tavares (band). This is an entirely different subject to Tavares (Rio Grande do Sul), which currently does not have an English article. I have again reverted your last change. Ghmyrtle 13:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I did make a mistake...[edit]But I'm a bit concerned that you immediately reverted and assumed I was abusing templates and wasn't a clerk as opposed to notifying me of the problem. I've put the case into the NC section. MSJapan 19:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Block[edit]Will you please provide the four diffs that you used to determine that I breached 3RR? BlueValour 21:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
You can close this BRFA: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/SkyBot_1. ~ Wikihermit 05:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Re:My blockedsoon template[edit]I made it yesterday or the day before and today I was thinking of changing it for the same reason. Thanks for telling me as I really wasn't sure about it. Angel Of Sadness T/C 15:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations, you are now a sysop[edit]Congratulations, your request for adminship was successful and you are now a sysop. You may wish to add yourself to Wikipedia:List of administrators. Once again, congratulations. --Deskana (talk) 12:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Congrats ST! :) Sebi [talk] 22:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Thank you, everyone! --ST47Talk·Desk 23:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! --ST47Talk·Desk 00:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Your reply[edit]
The problem is not a simple one and there is a lot i want to tell you, all i want is neutrality and not to be influenced by other administrators who back this guy. As I am sure by now you have been told. I am also on a public computer and different people edit, i was accused of some vandalism and it was not me, one of the reasons to find good administrator. The reason I am writing you is because you replied to my query, first.
List of UK locations[edit]Hi, I've now finished - I hope! - sub-dividing the pages listed at User:ST47/UKLC. Please will you re-run the query, so that I can see if I've missed anything? If you want to overwrite the last results with the new ones, that will be fine. Thank you. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 18:43, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Anonimu's talkpage[edit]Your decission to protect Anonimu's talkpage, combined with User:Sceptre removing userboxes from several users, including one admin, has lead to a controversial discussion. The discussion can be found here. This is what Sceptre said about your action: "No, ST47 protected it because Anonimu was disruptively removing comments because I'm a "blind supporter." He seems to suggest that he is a "blind supporter," but I guess that was an error from his part. I think he meant to imply that Anonimu removed his comments because he believed that Sceptre was a blind supporter, which would in turn constitute as a personal attack, and which made you protect the talkpage. I would like to know if that is how you reasoned when you protected the talkpage. --Thus Spake Anittas 23:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Your note re MI5[edit]Please stop posting information about other editors, regardless of whether you believe it to be true or not. If you persist, you will be blocked. Crum375 21:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Your note[edit]You are not appointed as a news provider of attempted outings of WP editors. Rest assured that we all have google and we all know how to use it. By your posting this information here, you are furthering the aims of the original harassers. Please stop, or you will be blocked. Crum375 22:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
DYK today[edit]You posted a dyktalk template on Talk:British Army - did you mean to put it on Talk:Johnny Ramensky, because I haven't been able to find a DYK factoid for the British Army, though you posted two user ones for Johnny Ramensky. Just noticed it on my watchlist. RHB - Talk 11:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
OsamaK’s bot[edit]Hey ST47! I just reverted several hundred bot edits on Wikimedia Commons when I saw, that OsamaK uses the bot here for the same purpose. Look at some examples:
This bot task is dangerous for our project. On Commons users explicitly have to express that their uploads are “own work”. We often have to delete files as copyvios transfered via CommonsHelper because we can’t find a source on en.wikipedia.org (again and again: actors, musicians, often uploaded by users with a few edits, no source, no permission). :-( --Polarlys 17:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Commons images on the main page[edit]Hello! When placing a Commons image on the main page, please remember to first upload it to the English Wikipedia and tag it with the {{c-uploaded}} template. Otherwise, it will not be protected (so a vandal can replace it at the Commons and change what appears on our main page). We just had Image:Hawaii turtle 2.JPG repeatedly replaced with an image of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and it could just as easily have been a Goatse image. Thanks! :-) —David Levy 07:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
OsamaKBOT[edit]No problem, as you see. I'll stop it--OsamaK 12:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Why were the audio samples removed? Wikipedia:Music samples states "There's no limit of how many samples you could use in one article" and other FA musician articles have more samples than this, eg. Kylie Minogue, Pink Floyd, AC/DC. There shouldn't be a set number of samples allowed; each sample must be judged for fair use seperately, eg. The Sensual World song was discussed in great detail in the article so its sample easily satisfied fair use. I may reverse your edit if I don't hear from you soon. Epbr123 13:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks + your sig[edit]I dunno if you noticed it or not, but your bot signed a recent comment to my talk page with a datestamp of "21:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)." If this is true, I demand you divulge to me the details of how you reconstructed the the flux capacitor. Now. (hehe, totally just kidding with you). :D Anyway, thought you might be interested in that bug. Have a good one, and cheers. :) --slakr 03:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
This image was tagged because it was orphaned fair use (CSD I5), not because it was missing a fair use rationale (CSD I6). In any case, the image was not orphaned, as it was reinstated immediately after it was tagged, and the editor who readded the image perhaps forgot to remove the tag on the image. Can you take another look at this, and perhaps restore it so a fair use rationale can be written? Thanks! —Kurykh 17:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
"Eureka" Beverly Barlowe image[edit]Why was this image removed? It had a correct URL and was there for quite some time... (Signed by User:GSK, just not logged in right now)
Image[edit]Why did you remove the image of the blue rahkshi? I'd like a good reason.Swirlex 19:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
That wasn't the answer to my question I'll put it in bold so you can see it if you didn't before Why did you remove the image of the blue rahkshi?heres that link you are desperate for.RahkshiSwirlex 01:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
And what about the other images of rahkshi.Swirlex 14:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The other images in the rahkshi Bio. Why are you not taking those away to.Swirlex 14:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Changes you made to Keane article[edit]I'm all for getting rid of stuff that shouldn't be in Wikipedia, but can you at least clean up the mess you make as you do it? You've left broken links, legacy text and template image tags in the Keane (band) article. -- Scjessey 12:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for Breaking Articles, You Great Administrator You[edit]You know, I am fed up with self-righteous administrators and brainless bots breaking perfectly good articles with perfectly good rationale for things like specific photo content. I am so upset you don't even understand. Most people who contribute to Wikipedia don't have the time to fight with this garbage and will just tell you to go to h$ll and not fix it! You are diminishing the quality of Wikipedia, and if that's your primary contribution, then you SUCK! It's too much work fighting the system when you're just trying to contribute a little bit of knowledge or add an openly-available media release picture, which of course, I can't properly put a license on because the correct options just aren't there anymore. Why is this? Administrative power trips, perhaps? So, thank you for pissing me off and making me hate the world again. And furthermore, do you actually read the photo descriptions or the rationales the people put on them? Or do you just systematically go around deleting things that look like they're unlicensed? Because I have news for you: photos I put up are always, always legitimately available freely. I just don't have the correct options available to me in order to tell YOU what that license actually is. What is the point of expecting proper licensing tags if you don't give general users the ability to tag them properly? I believe I have contributed to this community a LOT, yet I feel treated like crap and undermined at every turn. Self-righteous jerkwads love to exert their power over the puny Wiki-peasant masses and frustrate their best efforts at making good, not-broken articles. Thanks so much! You're a pal breaking my articles! What a nice guy! Yayyy! I'm so happy I have to re-upload an image at some point that I couldn't tag property given the options! Yayyy! I'm so happy you noticed! Yayyy I'm so glad you didn't check that it was actually legitimage! Yayyy, big brother, I'm so happy! You're great! Do you get points for every crappy edit you make that frustrates normal users? Does someone pat you on the back? Or is this the best way to troll Wikipedia-- with an official title? That way you can frustrate people legitimately and get a kick out of your power. Does it make you feel special inside? Do you rub shoulders with President George Bush, because you're acting like him-- a great leader and the greatest tyrant the world has ever known. Heil Bush! Heil Wikipedia! HEIL HEIL HEIL.
As long as I'm ranting about Wikipedia, how much time to you spend on this project? I'm sure a lot. Why do you think it helps anybody to blindly remove content without looking at what it is or where it actually came from? I put it right there! You could have read it for god sakes! If you want to improve your precious Wikipedia you care so much about, why not be more CAREFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ????—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.33.100.135 (talk • contribs)
So, even if it's a long-winded and a little underhanded of an apology, I honestly do feel bad for the personal stuff. Sorry.
Teenagent Image for If Looks Could Kill (film)[edit]can you tell me what happened to my teenagent image video cover screen shot, why it was deleted and why I was not informed on my profile talk page? Govvy 08:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Lions rugby logo[edit]I notice that you deleted Lions rugby logo 2007.png, most likely as a copyvio. I was asked by another admin to put a detailed fair use rationale on that page, which I did while the page was still active. AFAIK, the use of that image in Lions (Super rugby franchise) qualified under fair use. Should this page be restored, or not? — Dale Arnett 14:47, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleting images[edit]Please actually check if a rationale has been added before deletion, as in the case of Image:Tbmviolet.jpg. --Eyrian 16:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Main Page Report[edit]
19:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Miguel Alvarado.JPG[edit]I noticed it was removed from page. What was the reason. We want to make sure its done correctly. thanxs
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.[edit]Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Try to be a little less messy when you delete an image. Clarityfiend 01:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Your edits on OGG samples[edit]According to I6, you deleted the OGG samples on Keane due of not having a fair use rationale which actually had. Having been deleted about four times, I'll upload the samples once more and I'll just tell you, if you delete them again, I'll link them when they cannot be deleted as I did once. And it worked. Nāhuatlahtōlcopa cēntlamatilizāmoxtli īpan.--Fluence 03:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Bag Bot[edit]Hi there seems to be a bug in it see here, notice that it has the wrong time stamp on the sig. --Chris g 10:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
to trevianmotto@hotmail.com[edit]Reply to your email bounced. Message follows: On 8/4/07, Dan Collins wrote: > On 8/4/07, Achilles Sakai <trevianmotto@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > whyd u remove the logo from the new trier page > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Messenger Café — open for fun 24/7. Hot games, cool activities served daily. Visit now. > > http://cafemessenger.com?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_AugWLtagline > > Speedy deletion criterion I6, no fair use rationale, as I stated in my edit summary. > > -- > ST47 > Administrator, en.wikipedia > --ST47Talk·Desk 12:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
picture[edit]its poster !!, every movies in wikipedia have poster. whats wrong ? --Sport woman 16:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Image removal[edit]Make sure you remove the whole image tag; you've done this a couple times. Postdlf 16:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
About me[edit]You are annoying 19:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Pat MacDougall.jpg[edit] Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pat MacDougall.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ST47Talk·Desk 20:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC) So what if the picture is big? I just resize it when I use it, what's the problem?
Excuse Me[edit]Is it any surprise that you have become an administrator only to delete images and destroy other people's useful work? Especially when you yourself don't know how to post images. Idiot. Jade1984 08:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
From /Now[edit]user:STBotI is out of control :-p. See diff. ~ Wikihermit 03:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Bot very err.. Efficient[edit]Hi, Is it possible to ad a delay to your bot "STBotI", i uploaded an image, then forgot the tag, clicked immediately on edit to add the appropriate tag, and by the time it was done it had added a warning to my talk page and a deletion warning to the image page. I think if the bot was delayed by 5 to 10 minutes, then you might reduce the number of situations like mine, whilst still reminding people to tag their images. Thanks User A1 12:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Bogus "no rationale" tagging[edit]Regarding this edit, what more do you expect to see a rational state that isn't completely redundant to the non-free content tag already on the page? It might be the case that the tag on the page is inaccurate (I see the image isn't used yet, and it's an album cover not a DVD cover) but a user provided rationale isn't going to be any better. Please don't demand rationales except in cases where the validity of the fair use claim looks questionable. --Gmaxwell 13:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
socks[edit]Interesting to note that Jade1984 was a sock of User_talk:Victoria_Eleanor who pretended to be dead. I see the odds of this ending well drastically decreasing. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 14:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
AccReqBot Question[edit]Hey, there. I've been helping out a bit at WP:ACC and noticed that when I or someone else creates an account for another user, AccReqBot is the one who welcomes them with {{Welcome}}. Is it possible (and I'm in no way a coding expert) to have some sort of user list where it signs a certain users name, or some way to notify a user on a list to welcome the new contributor? This is in no way a major concern, but I think new users would benefit greatly by being welcomed by other users rather than a robot. Thanks and happy editing, Arky¡Hablar! 20:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Heli.fw-61.jpg[edit]I'm trying to get the image deleted off of the Wikimedia Commons as the Commons does not allow for "Fair Use" images. I would like to reupload the pic to Wikipedia with the following: Fair use for Image:Heli.fw-61.jpg[edit]Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:
Source: Focke-Wulf Fw 61 on All the World's Rotorcraft. Since you were the admin that deleted the image, I wanted to be sure that it would meet your requirements and/or your understanding of Wikipedia's fair use requirements before proceeding. The image is to be used in the infobox on Focke-Wulf Fw 61. It is also found on the web at various resolutions at many other sites (here, here, here, here, and here) and is one of the most popular images of this particular helicopter. --Born2flie 11:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Your bot[edit]The speed and fast-paced nature of your bot is being disruptive when it's completing it's tasks. I ask that it's edit rate is slowed. — Moe ε 12:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
and again...[edit]Serously, did you even bother to slow the rate like I asked you too? It just tagged another one of my images in under a minute of me uploading it. It doesn't matter how fast the task is performed by the bot, all that matters is that it's actually performed. Next time, I'm not going to bring this argument here anymore, if it happens again, I'll bring it to adminsitrator's noticeboard. — Moe ε 15:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, this is fucking ridiculous. Now I uploaded Image:Wings to Fly and a Place to Be.jpg and it tagged it for speedy deletion with the rationale: "Duplicate of deleted image File:Wingstoflyandaplacetobe.jpg [3] Since when are we not allowed to upload new images when the old one was deleted? — Moe ε 17:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC) Tagging of duplicate images[edit]Hi. Can you check out STBotI's tagging of duplicates? It tagged Image:Front page shiur time yomatzmaout.JPG for a speedy as a duplicate of itself, which is probably not what it should do. --B 05:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Image:[edit]Example. - Dudesleeper · Talk 18:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
No joke[edit]That was a serious request. Wikipedia needs a bot like the one I have in mind. Please approve it. P.S. You can control it. I'm basically a novice at BASIC.
StBotI[edit]Hi, your bot adds "Template:Di-no license" to commons images. That template does not appear to exist on commons. Same for the user talk page template. Please fix that, and the pages the bot edited. Thanks, Magnus Manske 20:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Got it![edit]Added new source code to AntiMalBot.
Gp75motorsports 21:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)gp75motorsportsGp75motorsports 21:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC) DRV cleanup[edit]I am not sure how to complete the overturn based on our prior discussion. Please see User_talk:Radiant!#Possible_Deletion_Review 11:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Image:Sitel logo.gif[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Image:Sitel logo.gif. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sigma 7 03:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Bot image messages[edit]ST47, what do you think (if this is even possible) of adding a minimum of three minutes between image upload and user talk page message for your bot? Sometimes getting the messages right on time can be quite annoying for established editors who add the proper tag in the very next diff.--Chaser - T 04:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Bot malfunction[edit]Your bot seems to have a problem with Unicode characters in image names, resulting in it creating pages like Image:Dennis&SanPedroDeSaño.jpg, or the now-deleted Image:Alizée.jpg. --Carnildo 06:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Undelete Image[edit]You had cleared out a few fair-use images I had up that had been tagged by a bot while I was away from the wiki for a while. They are Image:UsmLogo.gif and Image:UsmHuskies.gif. These images are University logos for use on their specific page. If you can undelete and tag a message on my page, I'll take care of fixing the rational for them. Thanks, Autocracy 10:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC) From /Now[edit]Hi, sorry to bother you, but I think User:STBotI may be malfunctioning. It is tagging for speedy deletion duplicates of images that were previously speedy deleted. However, a prior SD is not binding, and I have checked several that are inappropriate. In one, an album cover, the prior image was uploaded by a banned user, but that isn't relevant as long as the current user isn't banned. Another was deleted previously for lack of a fair use rationale, but there's one now. I don't think prior SD's should be flagged for SD. They have to be examined on their current merits. Thanks! -- But|seriously|folks 07:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Undelete request[edit]Hello. Could you undelete Image:Dolza from Robotech Macross.jpg so that I may add non-free fair use rationale and reinsert the image into the Dolza and Boddole Zer articles? I apologize for the inconveniance, however the image was tagged [5] for deletion while I was out on vacation [6]. Thank you for your time. --Kralizec! (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
"no FU in user space"[edit]Those images were not FU. ≈ Maurauth (Ravenor) 16:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure of the story with your bot, but it clearly needs a good deal of fine tuning. In addition to marking images as duplicates of themselves, it's doing things like marking images for deletion saying, "previously deleted elsewhere as orphaned", when the current one is not orphaned, or "previously deleted elsewhere as no license", when the current has a license. Just wanted to give you a heads up; as of yet, I have seen few to no postive contributions from the bot (though those may be deleted). The Evil Spartan 23:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
:Image:Swtpclgo.png[edit]You deleted :Image:Swtpclgo.png because it did not havea fair use rationale. This is true. The license was incorrect because the logo was not a registered trademark. Southwest Technical Products did not copyright their catalogs or brochures and they only used a trademark on a few software products. I will ask around and try to determine how to tag the image. Do you know? -- SWTPC6800 00:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Your bot[edit]Has problems. It linked to an image as Image:Image[7], and claimed it had no fair use rationale when in fact it did. Oh, and its Unicode support sucks. Image:Charles Münch.jpg -Nard 01:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC) Bot glitch[edit]Please ask your bot what this was all about. -- RHaworth 17:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
You have a problem[edit]You're way too much obsessed on the FU, and you act like a malfunctioning bot deleting images with a FUR applied as I proved on the cover for Hopes and Fears. I think it's obvious for any rational living being covers are the only image which could possibly illustrate an album; furthermore there is a special template for them, so if you're not lacking logic you won't delete that image when I upload it again, get it? If not, you may be a bot--Fluence 15:20 8 August 2007 (UTC-5) 2the Max[edit]Regarding the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2the Max as 'no consensus', please consider that this AfD was already coming from Deletion review, so arriving at a consensus would be desirable. Moreover, it seems to me that the first opinions have been based on a not sufficiently thorough evaluation of the sources. For these reasons relisting the discussion would in my opinion be the better option. --Tikiwont 20:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Bot not leaving correct warning messages[edit]I've blocked your bot. The warning message has an extra "image:" in th filelink making it look like it has already been deleted :-( Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
BAGBot[edit]I noticed BAGBot is signing as you - this is rather misleading. Could you possible change it to sign as itself? Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 03:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
User:ST47/IMG edit summaries[edit]Can STBotI leave a more descriptive and not-so-loud edit summary when editing User:ST47/IMG? The (WARNING! WIKI IS ABOUT TO EXPLODE!) thing makes it look like a vandal edit summary. Also, it may be better to just link to the images (possible copyvio and/or non-free) instead of inlining them. Resurgent insurgent 04:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Recent image removals[edit]I'm not sure if I should hope these edits were the result of a malfunctioning bot, or of a malfunctioning user. Either way, it's not something that should be happening. --Carnildo 05:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Not sure if this is the right place[edit]I left a note on your bots talk page here about a possible mishandling of special characters. --Pekaje 12:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Lou Harrison Photo Removal[edit]I have noticed that the image of the composer Lou Harrison has been deleted. Now that the composer is dead, how would it be possible to get a free image of him? Surely the image would be justified on the basis of fair use in this instance? --Godfinger 14:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you have deleted these images under CSD i6, but to my knowledge, they had not been tagged. Policy requires that i6 images can only be deleted "seven days after they are tagged". Please provide the log that these images were indeed tagged. — Edokter • Talk • 15:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/Image:Hellskitchenlogo.jpg Page history
* 21:10, August 1, 2007 . . Videmus Omnia (Talk | contribs | block) (146 bytes) (Image is missing fair use rationale and will be deleted in
seven days if it is not added.)
* 10:28, April 25, 2007 . . Cydebot (Talk | contribs | block) (98 bytes) (Robot - Renaming non-free template "tv-screenshot" per
Wikipedia:Non-free content/templates.)
* 17:10, July 25, 2006 . . 71.29.77.154 (Talk | block) (Summary)
* 22:19, June 26, 2006 . . Pacman5 (Talk | contribs | block) (official logo for hell's kitchen)
File history
* 22:19, June 26, 2006 . . Pacman5 (Talk | contribs | block) 360×288 (71,814 bytes) (official logo for hell's kitchen)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/Image:GordonRamsay.jpg Page history
* 21:24, August 1, 2007 . . Videmus Omnia (Talk | contribs | block) (109 bytes) (Image is missing fair use rationale and will be deleted in
seven days if it is not added.)
* 04:24, April 23, 2007 . . Cydebot (Talk | contribs | block) (61 bytes) (Robot - Renaming non-free template "Film-screenshot" per
Wikipedia:Non-free content/templates.)
* 15:26, November 14, 2006 . . Wiki alf (Talk | contribs | block) (Reverted edits by 194.70.181.1 (talk) to last version by Thunderbrand)
* 14:34, November 7, 2006 . . 194.70.181.1 (Talk | block)
* 13:36, September 17, 2005 . . Thunderbrand (Talk | contribs | block) ({{film-screenshot}})
* 19:36, July 7, 2005 . . Madchester (Talk | contribs | block) ({{screenshot}} from Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares)
File history
* 14:43, July 29, 2005 . . Dmn (Talk | contribs | block) 928×536 (187,470 bytes) (removed black border)
* 19:36, July 7, 2005 . . Madchester (Talk | contribs | block) 960×544 (47,210 bytes) ({{screenshot}} from Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares)
--ST47Talk·Desk 15:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Repopulation[edit]See new discussion location at Category talk:Films by shooting location. Continued help needed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Your bot[edit]Would you please kill your malfunctioning bot? It keeps tagging images that have a valid FU rationale as lacking it. [8] Óðinn 16:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me a moment...[edit]You're intentions expressed on my page are good, but I think I have the right to express my anger. Please leave me alone! --Defender 911 (Leave a message!) 20:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Bot edit[edit]Hi, Your bot recently re-added a flag icon to a place of birth in a bio article infobox, just after I had removed it.[9] Flag icons for place of birth and death are very strongly deprecated, per WP:FLAG: "Not for use in locations of birth and death." There are some very good reasons for that. You can read recent discussions about that particular use of flag icons here and here. Perhaps you could have a word with your bot. And thanks for your work in creating a bot to do the thankless, tedious mopping up on Wikipedia. If there isn't a Barnstar For Bots, there should be! ॐ Priyanath talk 03:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
2the Max - Please relist[edit]As I am not sure if you actually noticed in the middle of all the bot related messages my note [10] or if I expressed me clearly enough, would you please consider to relist Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2the Max for the reasons given previously? --Tikiwont 08:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}
![[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Wings_to_Fly_and_a_Place_to_Be.jpg&diff=149578601&oldid=149578584){kind=link}
![[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Image:Keiichi_Morisato_%28Oh_My_Goddess%21_Manga%29.png&action=history){kind=link}
![[8]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Rahpsody_of_Fire.png&action=history){kind=link}