User talk:Rustylad301
December 2024
[edit]
Hello, Rustylad301, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Bigboss19923 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- thanks your most welcome Belbury (talk). I'll do my best. Rustylad301 (talk) 12:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Do your best to do what? You should not use multiple accounts to evade a block. Belbury (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try my best to evade a block at all costs Rustylad301 (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are you the same person as Bigboss19923? Belbury (talk) 12:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try my best to evade a block at all costs Rustylad301 (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Do your best to do what? You should not use multiple accounts to evade a block. Belbury (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bigboss19923 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigboss19923. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 18:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.